Stewie Griffin wrote: » I agree with Sammy. I don't know why teachers insist on getting into discussions with random strangers on the Internet, which basically amount to apologising for their very existence. The nuances of these discussions rarely stray beyond "Yeah but June, July and August!" over and over again. Why bother arguing with people who have no intention of being convinced and are mostly here to sling mud? I do my job to the best of my ability. My students and their parents recognise and appreciate this. I don't feel the need to justify myself to boardsies. My advice is simple: let the Internet abuse flow past you and enjoy your job as best you can. I love teaching. It doesn't do anyone any good to spend your spare time explaining yourself. Not trying to sound preachy, and apologies if I come across that way.
celt262 wrote: » If they do decide to vaccinate teachers i hope that they exclusively use the Astrazeneca which should have them fully vaccinated a few weeks before they return to school for the new school year. That will keep them happy and the rest of us can hopefully get the J&J, Pfizer etc.
Sammy2012 wrote: » Can you explain your thoughts behind this?
lulublue22 wrote: » Your right tbf - I think I’m having one of those weeks - lockdown blues have hit hard. I need to disengage.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » You looking to knock off a few of us wasters with blood clots?
celt262 wrote: » It will p*ss them off as over half the summer will be gone by the time they are full Vaccinated, while anyone who gets a Pfizer/J&J etc will be good to go in a lot quicker time scale.
TheValeyard wrote: » Congratulations. You win silly post of the day and it's not even noon.
Galwayhurl wrote: » I don't get this. Have they voted to go on strike in September if they don't receive the vaccine by the end of THIS school year? Even though they will have received the vaccine by September no matter what order they are administered?
is_that_so wrote: » Roll on next Monday - the beginning of the rest of our lives!
lulublue22 wrote: » Back on site since Feb - has kept me sane to be honest - love the banter and craic of working with kids. Though I’d be lying if I didn’t say love the Summer hols too
cheezums wrote: » if teachers think they are more at risk they should provide scientific evidence.
lulublue22 wrote: » Teachers, SNAs in several special schools receive jab HSE sanctioned in the Dublin / Wicklow area - does the right hand know what the left hand is doing ? Interested in all those posters who are lambasting school staff for wanting to be vacc think of this.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » Post that again. I don’t understand what you’re trying to say.
lulublue22 wrote: » Can’t post link - it’s on the RTE news app. Special schools in the Dublin/ Wicklow area were called by the HSE for vacc.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » They were contacted to provide a list the day after the rollout order was changed. Was this by post? Was the letter written and posted before the new rollout broke? I have absolutely no issue with special schools moving into the HCW sector due to the nature of the duties they carry out. I think you’d be hard pressed to find members of the public that wouldn’t support those workers being ahead of the age groups. But the union hasn’t used common sense and demanded a change to the roll out just for them. They think the lives of ALL teachers are worth more than the lives of ALL 60 year olds who are not one of them. It’s maddening, it really is.
lulublue22 wrote: » Phone calls apparently - I just find it interesting - HSE in that area contacted special school staff re vacc post vacc list change , also interesting that it was only 1 HSE area that did so. Unions represent their members - special ed does not have a separate union. Rightly or wrongly I can’t see any union prioritising one group of members over another.