AndrewJRenko wrote: » Just to be clear, the junction was blocked for five minutes by the two drivers driving on the wrong side of the road.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Life really is too short for that ****e. 5 minutes having back and forth when all he had to do was make his point and report them. What happens then is the junction is blocked for those legally using it for a full 5 minutes. He's no intention of preceding through that junction himself he was heading back to his bush, so why throw himself into the middle of the road when he can just as easily film every one of them from the footpath and report them and avoid any confrontation? Wouldn't do the clicks on youtube is why.
Seve OB wrote: » nothing about keyboard warriors or your guess about 1% of Mikeys viewers driving his stomping ground?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » 1) Most cyclists ARE motorists.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » 1) Surehttps://www.theguardian.com/environm...ng-boom-survey
Duckjob wrote: » I can just imagine trying to progress an assault charge with the gardai in that situation. It would be that scene in Goodfellas....
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Surehttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/aug/10/cycling-boom-survey
CramCycle wrote: » "Have you not seen the viral videos" LOL, no, its a few thousand views in a city of millions a good chunk of those views are probably from Ireland at the minute. This said, it is funny how many of them persist in engaging with him, they are morons. You see the smart ones immediately pull back in, but the ones who persist, you have to wonder the mentality. They would have been through the junction. I still say if his only interest was safety though he would simply sit there and film and report. That said, luckily for him he isn't in Ireland or he would have to go to court each time of the gardai even bothered and a judge or garda would blame him for some of the incidents.
No, no, you insulted him a little bit, you got a little bit out of order yourself...
Seve OB wrote: » have you got evidential stats to back up your assumptions there?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » 1) Most cyclists ARE motorists. 2) Most keyboard warriors ARE motorists. You're right to say that most of them probably don't drive in that location, but do you think it is reasonable to say that maybe 1% of viewers drive in that location occasionally?
[Deleted User] wrote: » I doubt many of 20k are motorists who drive that place. I bet most are cyclists and or keyboard heros
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Yes, it absolutely is conjecture - a fairly reasonable conjecture. Are you actually suggesting that, with a wide audience like 20k views, there isn't one viewer in there who is going to decide, on their next spin through Gandalf corner - "hang on - maybe yer man is behind the bushes again - I'll wait in the queue".
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Maybe it's just me, but I'd have thought that, if you're driving an automatic car, you should have some idea of what happens when you lift your foot off the brake, and be capable of planning accordingly, like putting the car into neutral or reverse before lifting your foot? Honestly, if you're not capable of managing the vehicle in such circumstances, you shouldn't be behind the wheel. It's not really a great excuse for driving 2 or 3 tonnes of metal at a person, a human, someone's father, someone's brother. But it is interesting to note the rush to excuse violence towards Mikey even in advance of it actually happening. Again, the YouTube hits are very likely to have a significant deterrent effect. It would never be possible to measure or prove this, but if 20k people see this video, there's a good chance that a few of them will decide not to drive on the wrong side of the road at this or any junction.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Maybe it's just me, but I'd have thought that, if you're driving an automatic car, you should have some idea of what happens when you lift your foot off the brake, and be capable of planning accordingly, like putting the car into neutral or reverse before lifting your foot? Honestly, if you're not capable of managing the vehicle in such circumstances, you shouldn't be behind the wheel. It's not really a great excuse for driving 2 or 3 tonnes of metal at a person, a human, someone's father, someone's brother.
Weepsie wrote: » You need to stop making these assumptions. You've already been warned. Ordinarily I wouldn't care, but you are repeatedly asking for proof from other posters and relying on nothing more than conjecture yourself. There are millions upon millions of videos of bad and illegal behaviour, yet we still have it. You're at the "if it saves one life, please think of the children" end of the wedge now.
km991148 wrote: » here's today's recommendation.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qklan0aVvEI fear for the guy at this stage - its only a matter of time before someone does him serious damage. (I don't want to get into the tugging the forelock nonsense again, I am just leaving it there as a statement)
Seve OB wrote: » He is so full of sh1t. You could hear him already riled up as he ran out. He goes on about the guy being so aggressive which I didn’t see at all. Mikey was the only aggressive person in this clip. Guy hit the brakes, then reversed and got back into his lane and showed absolutely no signs of aggression. I don’t think he drove into mikey, to me it looks like he just lifted off the brake and the car moved forward which is what happens with automatic cars and if you are thick enough to remain standing in front of one then an accident can and will happen someday.
CramCycle wrote: » He certainly wasn't aggressive, a bad driver in that he panicked and lifted the foot off the brake, but not aggressive. He lifts his hand, reverses, doesn't open his mouth in anger. The driver was 100% in the wrong but Mickey is going to be accused by some of looking for a claim which is what I would have thought if someone done that to me. Like I said before, if he sat the camera there and just recorded them, most of them would be off the road by the end of the week as undoubtedly most of them would have been repeat offenders. What does he want, bad drivers off the road or youtube hits, he could have both is he stopped running out in front of people.
km991148 wrote: » if he is not careful his family will see more grief.
MojoMaker wrote: » Nowt wrong with that. It's a junction well known for folks trying it on. Cock in the Freelander was quick enough to get back in lane as he knew he was being a cock. Also plenty of traffic coming up from the right of the picture that you couldn't possibly see when shaving that right turn, not just bikes.
km991148 wrote: » here's today's recommendation.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qklan0aVvE I fear for the guy at this stage - its only a matter of time before someone does him serious damage. (I don't want to get into the tugging the forelock nonsense again, I am just leaving it there as a statement)
MojoMaker wrote: » Nowt wrong with that. It's a junction well known for folks trying it on. Cock in the Range Rover was quick enough to get back in lane as he knew he was being a cock. Also plenty of traffic coming up from the right of the picture that you couldn't possibly see when shaving that right turn, not just bikes.