mik_da_man wrote: » 30 atm in O'Brienshttps://www.obrienswine.ie/products/powers-3-swallow-release-70c
FileNotFound wrote: » Might have to have a look there so. Thanks
cadaliac wrote: » Just picked up a bottle for €30.
cullenswood wrote: » Would that be the best value bottle, discount wise, in that O'Brien's sale?
Knightofcydonia wrote: Came home from work to a nice surprise, the wife picked me up a bottle of Bushmills 16. I'm a whiskey novice but I've tried some fine whiskeys so far such as Redbreast 12 & 21, Blue spot and the single pot still sample pack from Irish Distiller's.... I think the Bushmills is my favourite so far, I'm tempted to pour a second!
Black Sheep wrote: My order arrived from Dick Macks. Six samples.
Cazale wrote: » What you get?
murphyebass wrote: » Batch 1 on left vs batch 2 on the right.
killbillvol2 wrote: » Opened the Redbreast 10 last night. Ticks all the Redbreast boxes. If you like Lustau (I do) you'll love it.
murphyebass wrote: » Puca (from the blackwater distillery) second batch is now in Aldi. For €25 it’s a steal. I’m assuming they had an oversupply of bottles from the first batch as it says “batch 1” on the bottles I bought.
Padraig Mor wrote: » Unfortunately I don't have it any more, but I could have sworn my first release bottle (ok... bottles!) had the cork on the right of your pic.
Mellor wrote: » Good stuff. I essentially justified the purchase by telling myself if was the CS big brother of the Lustau.Somebody here may give you a better answer. But I imagine batch # is related to the distillation and distillery operations. And as no really bearing on Aldi's logistics and promotions department.
murphyebass wrote: » It should say batch 2. Not batch 1.
Mellor wrote: » Well, you really aren't in a position to know that. Might be the case. Might not. (I don't know either)
murphyebass wrote: » Well considering blackwater distillery confirmed it was the 2nd batch to a mate of mine through Twitter I’d say I am in a position to know that.
pleasant Co. wrote: » Twitter is handy because you can link to the tweet and share that confirmation with us all.
murphyebass wrote: » Not sure why you’d have reason to believe I’m lying. What would I have to gain from doing so? Anyway, I’ve attached the evidence you obviously do sorely need. Hope that gives you the relief you desire.
NIMAN wrote: » I was having a little drop at home the other night and got to thinking about what actually makes a nice whiskey? I would often see super expensive whiskey for sale and wonder what it tastes like, as I'd never be buying it. Then I got to thinking "surely price doesn't mean you'll necessarily like it". So perhaps I could blind taste an everyday, run of the mill €30 whiskey, and like it. Then blind taste a bottle of €1k whiskey and think its not as nice. I would guess people might look at it technically, and argue about complex tastes, production, aging etc, but I guess it all comes down to personal taste.
pleasant Co. wrote: » You weren't being accused of lying, however, you are no more than some random person on the internet saying something. You said "It should say batch 2. Not batch 1", but you also have the tweet to back it up, insert the confirming tweet at this point and we can all see it's blackwater distillery saying so and not the random internet person.
odyssey06 wrote: » Beyond a certain point taste preference is going to come into it. But along the continuum of the style of the whiskey, the more expensive whiskey should have more depth, complexity, layers, length than than cheaper one. If the expensive whiskey isn't in a style you like (too peated, too sherried or whatever) then you would prefer a €30 bottle of the style you do like. But if it's a rough young blend even in the style you do like, then an expensive bottle of the style you don't like would still have some qualities you might pick up on in terms of length, smoothness etc that you can appreciate I think same would apply with wine.