hello2020 wrote: » i m a new to this and want to start with couple of grands buying Crypto. which platform should i use to start with? which currency to pick for this small amount? is Coinbase or Uphold good places to start with?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Can I clarify this; does converting from BTC to ETH count as a taxable event?
cravings wrote: » Converting it to anything else counts as a disposal and is taxable.
Lex Luthor wrote: » this post never ageshttps://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=114404926&postcount=4365
Donegal1234 wrote: » Just checked on CoinGecko up over 18,000% since this time last year. Nice gains for anybody who bought cheap.
Irish_rat wrote: » What correction? Theta in the top 10
EagererBeaver wrote: » Are you going to announce it every week?
bfa1509 wrote: » What's causing this correction?
BrandonBay86 wrote: » Another 500,000 Satoshis thrown into cold storage for a few years.
Bob24 wrote: » J Powell actually join the BTC/gold debate today :-) Talking about Bitcoin he just said “It is essentially a substitute for gold rather than the dollar”.https://www.marketwatch.com/story/feds-powell-says-bitcoin-is-more-of-a-substitute-for-gold-than-the-dollar-11616424786
Room1o1 wrote: » Looks like I was thinking about it the wrong way. Bitcoin is comparable to gold �� but honestly your making my point better than me just I was giving gold too much credit just as some are giving bitcoin to much too
Mellor wrote: » Deflated Gold chart. Last 250 years. No exactly stable. Non linear y-axis too, so it's worse than it looks. Some body using Gold to store their wealth in 1980, lost almost 90% or it's real world value by 2000. They've managed to claw it back to 66% though. Woo-hoo.
Room1o1 wrote: » No mistake here thank you. Gold is created by supernovas not one but many. Takes its form due to the electron configuration. If copied your creating gold not a copy. It's rare, it's stable, its conductive and expensive for these reasons
djan wrote: I'd like to add that the value of gold is only so because people believe in it.
Room1o1 wrote: » Yeah no guarantee in life expext death and taxes. 6000 years is a good tract record though
Room1o1 wrote: » So you agree its not comparable to gold, at least not right now?
Room1o1 wrote: » I can agree with this. Not at you but some think I'm saying to abandon bitcoin I'm saying to be weary of its description as the new gold
makeorbrake wrote: » The bet on its further progression in the role is assymetric. For that reason, I believe its irresponsible for anyone not to have 1-2% exposure to bitcoin.
Mellor wrote: » It's ok. You don't need to reply. The fact you can't back up what you said, or provide examples is proving the case for those of us pointing out your mistakes.
makeorbrake wrote: » It's still formative in that role - but that is also why there is greater upside potential right now. In the future - once mature - I expect bitcoin to be a really boring asset (but one in which people can park up their wealth without having it eroded via inflation or confiscated by banks, governments, etc.). So you agree it's not comparable to gold. At least not right now I hold gold as well as bitcoin - so I wouldn't complain. That said, no more than bitcoin, gold should be continually assessed as we go forward. Past performance may provide some guidance re. future performance but it's not a guarantee. I never said don't buy bitcoin only gold. By point from the start is wondering why people compare it to gold. Is it wishful thinking or trying to convince others. As I said it has potential but potential is just that I'm not so sure - gold will probably be a good store of value then but there's no guarantee per se.