zell12 wrote: » More anti-parking wands installed along golf course wall. What is going on?
buzz11 wrote: » Heard today that Seamount (off Threadneedle rd) is introducing clamping to deter prom visitors from parking there, I'm not surprised, Threadneedle rd is a real bottleneck at the moment
zell12 wrote: » Is it not a public road? Therefore, they can't do that
cfeeneyinterior wrote: » It's an estate so they would be. Dun na carraige been doing it for years. They need to put in double yellow along the main road down to the roundabout, really tight with cars on both sides.
?Cee?view wrote: » Not necessarily. Most older estates wouldn't have private roads. Dun na Carraige is a much newer estate. I am sure the clampers would be aware
I am sure the clampers would be aware
Deleted User wrote: » Unfortunately it seems to be necessary, people driving to Salthill and leaving their cars on nearby roads. They should open up the main prom car park for badge holders only while parking is restricted.
what_traffic wrote: » Ya 100% agree, need more innovation from the Council. It would be a good facility to have in place post pandemic regardless
Seamount is a private estate and the road has not been taken in charge by the Council. The residents have clubbed together and hired a clamping company, which will erect signs in the coming days and begin clamping illegally parked cars from next week.
Deleted User wrote: » Isn't that what buzz11 said? I wonder if this will cause a wave of private estates introducng clamping as inconsiderate parkers get pushed from residential streets.
zell12 wrote: » Seamount is a pretty old estate, how is not taken into charge yet? Plenty of estates already have clamping or even cctv, but it is obvious there are management companies therein, in Seamount not obvious.
buzz11 wrote: » Seamount was built in '80's before the rules over private/public/taking in charge were fully clear & established like nowadays so I'm sure its something the council are searching through their files to find out! I really think the Seamount residents reaction is a bit of "dog in the manger", surely its not a big deal to facilitate parking during this pandemic? (except of course stupid parking blocking entrances & corners etc which should not be tolerated)
buzz11 wrote: » I really think the Seamount residents reaction is a bit of "dog in the manger", surely its not a big deal to facilitate parking during this pandemic? (except of course stupid parking blocking entrances & corners etc which should not be tolerated) Isn't it better to share the prom and sea views than bunkering down in whos entitled to what and so on.... the pandemic will be gone at some point and they can get their quiet estate back then, unlike other parts of town like near the uni & hospital
Mrs OBumble wrote: » The cyclist lobby groups want to remove parking permanently from the prom, to facilitate bicycle lanes.
zell12 wrote: » I disagree, it's a huge area for people to play around in on the sea front, rather then facilitating the storage of personal private property.
Deleted User wrote: » Which groups? I thought the proposal was for cycling lanes to go on the coastal side, using some of the road-side footpath, with most car parking moved across the road? (some loss from junctions) What is the current state trialing?
Ludikrus wrote: » Dog fouling has been a big problem in Seamount with the influx of cars parking there. Some residents opposed to clamping changed their minds because of the dog sh1t. The place was destroyed.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » Did they not supply Bio poop bags for the dog walkers?
Mrs OBumble wrote: » Why the he'll should they have to! If you want to take Poopy for a walk, take your own shít containers
Worn Out wrote: » It's amazing that there is still free parking on the prom. Travel most places in Europe and you would expect to pay a charge to park so close to the sea front. A charge would also make driver's think twice about their chosen means of transport and potentially reduce traffic in the area. Of course this would push traffic out in the estates but simply extend the pay parking zones. Residents would get passes. It's surprising that the council haven't introduced this yet as a strong source of revenue. Would you mind paying a couple of € to park on the prom? If I was in Spain, France, Italy etc I wouldn't expect free parking. Of course this is Galway, where illegal parking is rampant and where traffic cones are required to stop people parking on double yellow lines.
what_traffic wrote: » Good post - I am curious about this as Galway City Council do make a lot of money from Car parking in the City Centre. Could it be related to litigation? If Galway City Council were charging - would there would be an onus of care on them for the facilities that they charge to provide? So when the car parks and the prom floods - as they do regularly now - would they be liable?