MayoAreMagic wrote: » I disagree. It sounds like you are trying to convince yourself here. The split is a very real possibility. It was mooted by the gaa already, we both know this. Your mantra of 'it will never happen' sounds more like a guy with his fingers in his ears and eyes closed, chanting over and over again, to hide from reality. The odds of it coming to pass are actually quite high
EICVD wrote: » How in gods name is it a national issue? The government should be getting involved if that’s the case, far more important things to worry about than one county being successful
Garzorico wrote: » I think the poster meant it is a national issue for the GAA.
TheDalioLama wrote: » ExactlyIt's a national issue in terms of the GAA is what was said. Two posters mentioned it as a National Issue. One of the posters I believe meant it in the above context. Other I suspect was just being a tad hyperbolic
TheDalioLama wrote: » Exactly It's a national issue in terms of the GAA is what was said. Nobodies comparing it to Covid & Homelesness. The disprortionate funding argument is an open and shut case at this point. The Leinster chairman is on record acknowledging it's impact on the competition. I don't know what the solution is, but something radical will need to be done outside of the what is being proposed, or Gaelic football will end up being a cautionary tale for other sporting bodies.
ShyMets wrote: » Enquiring. I'll ask one final time. You've stated that this is a national issue. I asked twice what you were personally doing to effect change beyond posting on Boards. I await your response. Or perhaps I shouldn't hold my breath
ArielAtom wrote: » Connellan was schooled, went in ill prepared and was shown up, hence his reticence to bring his motion to congress this year, despite all his guff on Twitter.
ShyMets wrote: » In my opinion it's not a national issue. Covid, homeless, drug addiction are national issues. This is a GAA issue. Enquiring seems very passionate about the issue. I asked what else they were doing because solely posting on Boards won't make a blind bit of difference to future changes in the GAA. I've been doing nothing forward my views because I don't feel that strongly about it
rebel girl 15 wrote: » I don't think you'll get an answer to this. At least other people who hold a similar opinion are actually doing something about it, besides posting on a discussion forum, though judging by below, not well! When was this? The last thing you want to do when you are trying to get an issue off the ground is to go in ill prepared. You need to know the rulebook and the issue inside out, or you will be shown up. Having been in provincial council meetings and Central Council, if you aren't 100% prepared, you will be found out, unforgivingly. Same when writing appeals, you have to drill into the nitty gritty or they will be chucked out - I'm on 100% success rate so far for that reason.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » It is a national issue because it is going to affect the sport across the entire country. Covid, homelessness etc are more serious issues, but nobody said they werent. The reality is this will affect the game across the entire country, hence it is a national issue. Enquiring is entitled to make his points, the same as you are. This auld spiel of 'well what have you done about it' is a load of disingenuous bs, and generally, the guy making that point is struggling in the argument. That is the reality here, people dont have an answer for him so they go off with petty stuff like that. If the split hinged on this debate, dublin would be split long ago.
Enquiring wrote: » This was when the Leinster council chairman admitted to the financial disparity and agreed that it has decimated the championship.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » I will save you the hassle. He wasnt unprepared. He noted that some of the stats being put to him were not released prior to the debate and stated he therefore couldnt really make arguments against them. Quite an honest approach to be fair. He subsequently found that a lot of them werent actually accurate at all. Now an objective and reasonable person would very quickly wonder, regardless of your views on this topic, why the gaa would go and do that, and what that says about their honesty on the topic, and by extension, in general.
Enquiring wrote: » You're better off ignoring the deflection. You're right in saying something radical needs to be done and I think appetite for it is growing. Many are still unaware of just how much funding was pumped into Dublin, the huge effect it had across the board in terms of standards and then the resulting increase in income off the field. The more this can be publicised, the more the movement for change will gather pace.
dobman88 wrote: » The same time poor John got schooled. His first reply to Pat Teahans very first statement. "John Connellan: Well that’s the first I have heard of those figures" Poor John was so far out of his depth, he could have found Fungie.
JeffKenna wrote: » I heard him on the GAA hour this week saying that. It seems a bit underhanded to present previously unpublished information in a situation like that, especially if that information wasn't accurate.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » That is because they werent released before that. They werent accurate either...
Enquiring wrote: » If the Leinster council chairman had to admit to the effect the funding has had, someone who goes out of his way to defend it, you'd have to take his word for it?
ShyMets wrote: » Its not a national issue. Its an issue for the GAA to resolve. The Government will not be intervening as they have far more pressing matters at hand. When someone states this is a national issue then its a perfectly legitimate question to ask what are they doing to bring about change besides posting on Boards. It's also perfectly legitimate for the individual not to answer. But by not answering that leads to certain assumptions
tritium wrote: » Based on this thread I really doubt you’re going to get people on the streets for this pet project. You’re numbers have repeatedly been shown to be at best a loose interpretation of the facts, omitting or exaggerating key numbers such as number of coaches or gd spend to drive your argument. The vast level of income available to other counties has been highlighted. The vast additional (non county) spend by the GAA that you omitted has been highlighted. The expansion of the dublin project to rest of Leinster and redistribution of funding across many other counties has been highlighted. The huge numbers and huge increase in numbers of gd resources across rest of Leinster has been highlighted. The contribution of the dublin clubs, which effectively halved the cost of the GAA involvement has been highlighted, as have the unique issues that dublins face. The timings that could not be attributed to the funding have been highlighted as have the inconvenient lack of success in some key areas that don’t tally with the argument.
dobman88 wrote: » Of course. He's the one person who would know. I'd take his word over what you're saying here every day of the week.
dobman88 wrote: » John should have requested the figures if he was really investigating the issue. The fact that Teahan agreed to hand them over to him for a proper look shows he would have been successful in requesting them. Very poor by John tbf.
Enquiring wrote: » So you agree that the championship has been decimated due to the over funding of Dublin?
Tombo2001 wrote: » Chatting to my son about it the other day, we had a great idea. A condition is put in that where the Dubs win the regular all Ireland, they then - to reflect the inherent advantage of size - have to play a super all-ireland final where they play an all-star team made of the best players of all the other counties. If they beat that team then there truly can be no argument. And if they lose, then the winner is marked as AllStars rather than any one county. It would be some craic. And it would give an opportunity to the likes of an Eamonn O'Hara or Matty Forde to win an all ireland that might normally have no chance.