Samsonsmasher wrote: » Masks don't work Social distancing does not work Lockdowns don't work For the sake of a virus with a 0.03% death rate.
quokula wrote: » I believe travel is a wildly overstated issue as numbers of travellers are tiny and it is pretty insignificant compared to community transition. But if we leave that argument aside for a minute and just look at how it's been handled. If you look around the world, with the exception of some isolated countries in the Pacific and some totalitarian regimes, there really are very few examples of countries who's governments have done any better than ours. It's easy to criticise in hindsight, and to underestimate the challenge in doing something like this while many EU citizens live or work or come from different sides of the border and while trade and vital supplies still need to flow back and forth to keep society functioning. Could they have done better? Sure. But again, these are entirely unprecedented circumstances and nobody knew how it was going to pan out early in the pandemic, or when variants might emerge, and there really aren't very many governments in the world who've done any better than Ireland on this.
cuculainn wrote: » Have to take you up on this. majority of positive cases last summer were from a spanish variant that arrived, i'm guessing through travel, in June. today 80+% of all cases are from the UK variant that again i am guessing arrived here through travel. If you look to Denmark with population of 5 million they have had just over half the number of deaths Norway has had about 700 deaths with population of 5 million, finland again similar with deaths in hundreds interestingly they all have borders/linked to sweden who have had about 12,00 deaths and didnt really impose as strict restrictions. So to say we did similar to most of the rest of the countries in the world is not true, we just need to stop measuring ourselves against the worst countries.
Samsonsmasher wrote: » Masks don't work Social distancing does not work Lockdowns don't work We have destroyed the economy plunged ourselves in tens of billions of debt and created a social disaster for years to come. For the sake of a virus with a 0.03% death rate. The vaccine is now available for the very sick and very old who should be cocooning Only a handful of victims of working age died from this virus. Locking hundreds of thousands out of work - work which in many cases will not be there when restrictions are lifted - will plunge these people into poverty and homelessness. This was evident at the very start of this when everyone said lockdowns were a medecine worse than the disease. This entire fiasco hws been the greatest overreaction and own goal since the world went to war in 1914.
Cameron326 wrote: » What a load of tosh. I'll just bother with your first point: studies have shown that masks bring the rate of infection down by up to 5%.
PintOfView wrote: » Just as a matter of interest, how do you calculate 0.03% death rate? With 4,000 people dead from covid that means that 13 million of us already had the virus!! You need to redo your calculations!!! As regards masks and lockdowns not working, how do you figure that? Are you saying that the numbers of people infected with covid would have come down regardless?
Cameron326 wrote: » I'll just bother with your first point: studies have shown that masks bring the rate of infection down by up to 5%.
titan18 wrote: » Whether anyone is for or against the restrictions, I think everyone is in agreement with how badly this government is communicating and getting people on board with them.
HansKroenke wrote: » 2.8m of the population are under the age of 45. The death rate based on recorded cases is three times lower than the suicide rate in this age category. Over reaction to covid is a massive understatement.
bucketybuck wrote: » Cite? I have asked many times for numbers on mask efficacy and never received them, I'd be interested in reading your source on this?
paw patrol wrote: » I have read one study on them a Uk one. which said that if used correctly they offered some protection but if used incorrectly even once that protection dropped to zero. this was in households where somebody had an infection and only household member there. masks may work in a lab or a study. the only studies thrown at me on boards as a counter related to surgical masks in theatre which isn't the same environment as your local supermarket. in real life when they are cloth rags that are worn incorrectly and reused without cleaning - as is what is happening. they offer nothing. not to mention the whole freedom issue that many of boards seem happy to throw away in the hope of some made up protection from the worst killer virus ever .
cuculainn wrote: » Can you expand on these three points please as i am always hearing this and i genuinely dont know what to believe, as far as i can see, social distancing and masks do work as do lockdowns, otherwise there wouldnt be a reduction in case numbers when they occur. I do agree that they are not the long term solution the death rate, taken at face value in Ireland is about 2%
Samsonsmasher wrote: » The UK are the equivalent of the gold winning athlete who lapped you twice already while Ireland are the equivalent of the mad priest who runs onto the track with a kilt. Sure the UK have made mistakes at every turn but the fact is they are going to be out of lockdown and back to normal way before us and we will be languishing in lockdown while they will be enjoying pints in the pubs and cocktails on tropical beaches.
PintOfView wrote: » See following for one example ...https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118
Only one observational study has directly analyzed the impact of mask use in the community on COVID-19 transmission. The study looked at the reduction of secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Beijing households by face mask use (10).
Overall, evidence from RCTs and observational studies is informative, but not compelling on its own
Overall, direct evidence of the efficacy of mask use is supportive, but inconclusive. Since there are no RCTs, only one observational trial, and unclear evidence from other respiratory illnesses, we will need to look at a wider body of evidence.
First Up wrote: » I'd rate the government's performance higher than that of the people whose behaviour is still spreading the virus.
quokula wrote: » I believe travel is a wildly overstated issue as numbers of travellers are tiny and it is pretty insignificant compared to community transition. But if we leave that argument aside for a minute and just look at how it's been handled. ...
robbiezero wrote: » Who are they and how many cases per day are they causing?
beauf wrote: » Would you like a list of pps numbers?