nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

hatrickpatrick

The news has been full of stories about AstraZeneca having slashed their initial vaccine deliveries to the EU by 60% and the knock on fallout from that. But what’s either being buried in all the reporting, or simply hasn’t been reported at all, is what exactly happened? What’s the reason for the delay? Technical, logistical, commercial, etc?

I assumed it was similar to what was happening with Pfizer, which is essentially an issue of manufacturing capacity being reduced by an upgrade to their production facility. But what seems odd about the AstraZeneca situation is the anger directed towards them from officials and leaders, plus public statements that “They must honour their delivery commitments”, indicating that this isn’t an act-of-God type mishap in manufacturing, but an act of incompetence and/or willful reneging on the agreement - perhaps their capacity has remained the same but they’ve “bumped” the EU’s order in priority because others are paying more, or something along these lines?

Does anyone know what exactly the situation is? I can’t seem to find anything beyond extremely vague statements at the moment.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

GPoint

AstraZeneca vaccine production unscathed after fire breaks out at Serum Institute of India complex

https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/astrazeneca-vaccine-production-unscathed-after-fire-breaks-out-at-serum-institute

This was few days ago, however their announcements about delays came out around the same time.

Donald Trump

I got the impression that the EU signed up which would have allowed the company to proceed with pushing through development and testing and building up capacity as they already had a buyer guaranteed. EU might even have put a chunk of money down as prepayment to allow them to speed it up.

It seems now that there is an implication that they are deciding that now they have the final product in the bag and ready to go that they might be tempted to supply others before fulfilling their contractual obligations.

hatrickpatrick

Donald Trump wrote: »

I got the impression that the EU signed up which would have allowed the company to proceed with pushing through development and testing and building up capacity as they already had a buyer guaranteed. EU might even have put a chunk of money down as prepayment to allow them to speed it up.

It seems now that there is an implication that they are deciding that now they have the final product in the bag and ready to go that they might be tempted to supply others before fulfilling their contractual obligations.

This would make more sense than a genuine production capacity issue, certainly. Surely the consequence of doing this would be profound in terms of international contractual law not to mention EU licensing etc? Or is it a case of that being enough of a gamble to take given the potential money to be made in other markets?

NeuralNetwork

The European Commission is concerned about where its money went basically.

AstraZeneca were paid €336 million as a downpayment to assist with the R&D and production expansion effort and there's a commitment to order €750m worth of product from them. That isn't small change.

Stella Kyriakides, European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety's statement:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLIs2tZ7Cp4

As to what's happening. The answer is we don't know, but by the looks of it we'll be finding out shortly. She seems to be absolutely furious and I don't think they would kick off that level of undiplomatic language without there being more to this than a little misunderstanding.

Hopefully that's all it is though, but we'll see. There's a meeting tonight.

[Deleted User]

I'm kind of wondering if AZ had done some of the at risk manufacturing, but were peeved by the EMA's comments over Christmas that better data was needed, so they decided EMA approval was going to take longer than they had originally anticipated and shipped what they had made elsewhere where approval was closer or granted. Thinking they could catch up by the time EMA approval came through.

el Fenomeno

For her to come out and specifically mention concerns that they've sold/delivered then elsewhere is pretty sensational. Usually these accusations are hinted at or suggested, but to outright say it - yikes.

froog

the level of anger would seem to point to the EU knowing AZ is thinking about or has already supplied other customers, cutting into the EU agreement. rather than simple supply calculation/capacity f#ckups.

NeuralNetwork

Yeah it would seem quite unlikely she'd come out that strong on the topic if it were something small.

froog

on the radio now - AZ are playing hardball. talk of the UK not having any supply problems.

this won't end well.

Hurrache

Don't think it's them playing hardball, they've been caught in a lie of their own making by initially claiming the issue was supply problems, yet these supply problems aren't having an affect on any other customer.

Cerveza

China has some involvement too.

...Ghost...

My initial thoughts when I heard about the shortage was that AZ were supplying the UK with the batches destined for the EU.

edited to add: https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-astrazeneca-to-cut-covid-19-vaccine-delivery-to-eu-by-60-reports-12195923

Fr_Dougal

NeuralNetwork wrote: »

The European Commission is concerned about where its money went basically.

AstraZeneca were paid €336 million as a downpayment to assist with the R&D and production expansion effort and there's a commitment to order €750m worth of product from them. That isn't small change.

Stella Kyriakides, European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety's statement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLIs2tZ7Cp4

As to what's happening. The answer is we don't know, but by the looks of it we'll be finding out shortly. She seems to be absolutely furious and I don't think they would kick off that level of undiplomatic language without there being more to this than a little misunderstanding.

Hopefully that's all it is though, but we'll see. There's a meeting tonight.

Blatantly obvious, non-EU countries have paid above the odds for supply, and AZ have supplied them instead of fulfilling their EU orders.

NIMAN

Probably right.

At the end of the day, most things like this boil down to money.

L1011

They gave the UK stock that was being held for other countries on the assumption that it would be replaced before it was approved in those other countries. This was mentioned at the time they did it.

That is now catching up with them.

[Deleted User]

Does this undersupply fall somewhere in the Brexit context....

Seriously bad grace by the sounds of it.

Sweet.Science

What option does the EU have here ? Other than accepting they have been shafted and wait for the supplies to come ?

bennyl10

Sweet.Science wrote: »

What option does the EU have here ? Other than accepting they have been shafted and wait for the supplies to come ?

could easily sue if the conntract is broken

CIARAN_BOYLE

Sweet.Science wrote: »

What option does the EU have here ? Other than accepting they have been shafted and wait for the supplies to come ?

Depends on the contract.

They may be able to demand financial damages or leave Astra Zenaca the choice of paying damages or importing to the eu from other countries.

Sweet.Science

bennyl10 wrote: »

could easily sue if the conntract is broken

Doesn't really help on the supply though . May affect future supply if they did sue

Russman

Sweet.Science wrote: »

What option does the EU have here ? Other than accepting they have been shafted and wait for the supplies to come ?

True enough, but good luck to AZ getting any other future product onto shelves in the EU. It’s a big market to p1ss off at the expense of one the size of the UK. Europeans have long memories.

Donald Trump

Sweet.Science wrote: »

Doesn't really help on the supply though . May affect future supply if they did sue

They would still be liable to fulfill existing contracts.

If they did indeed pull a fast one then they shouldn't be let away with it.

Sounds a bit like a dodgy builder tactic where he gets paid up-front for an extension and then picks up other jobs in the meantime as he can because he knows the person who paid up front just has to sit and wait.

HalfAndHalf

Grabs popcorn, sits back to watch the thread turn into a ‘those bloody Brits it’s all a Brexit stitch up forgetting the company is half owned by a Swedish company’!!

Sweet.Science

Donald Trump wrote: »

They would still be liable to fulfill existing contracts.

If they did indeed pull a fast one then they shouldn't be let away with it.

Sounds a bit like a dodgy builder tactic where he gets paid up-front for an extension and then picks up other jobs in the meantime as he can because he knows the person who paid up front just has to sit and wait.

Yeah I agree they have opened themselves up for a massive lawsuit

Money in 5 yrs time is pointless now though

drunkmonkey

Fr_Dougal wrote: »

Blatantly obvious, non-EU countries have paid above the odds for supply, and AZ have supplied them instead of fulfilling their EU orders.

They might have paid over the odds but it's still cheaper than what Pfizer & Co were offering them, I was listening to one of the girls on the team making it, think she was Irish a few weeks ago, the intention was to get it to the poorer counties first as the others were too expensive.

HalfAndHalf

Sweet.Science wrote: »

Yeah I agree they have opened themselves up for a massive lawsuit

Money in 5 yrs time is pointless now though

How so? There are precisely zero facts as yet and just because there’s been some very unstatesmanlike rants coming out of Brussels it’s not what you think, it’s what you can prove.

All anyone has been told as yet is that there’s been a fire in an Indian plant and production issues at a Belgian plant, the latter being the cause of the Pfizer and BioNtech delays.

MrMusician18

Sweet.Science wrote: »

What option does the EU have here ? Other than accepting they have been shafted and wait for the supplies to come ?

Export ban would probably be the most serious consequence.

emo72

They sold to the Brits, and their delivery van had broke down. I'm not forgetting about you guvnor, I'll give you a call next week, gotta fly mate, me missus is on the other line.

Danzy

Sweet.Science wrote: »

What option does the EU have here ? Other than accepting they have been shafted and wait for the supplies to come ?

They could pull the finger out and get it approved.

The response has been pretty limp wristed for the last few months.

An Ri rua

HalfAndHalf wrote: »

How so? There are precisely zero facts as yet and just because there’s been some very unstatesmanlike rants coming out of Brussels it’s not what you think, it’s what you can prove.

All anyone has been told as yet is that there’s been a fire in an Indian plant and Belgian plant, the latter being the cause of the Pfizer and BioNtech delays.

2 fires? One fire is unfortunate...