RoryMac wrote: » The issue with other hospitals not getting their vaccinations rests with the HSE but I don't see why the Coombe should be behind any other hospital, they have emergency facilities and can't worry about testing for Covid when an ambulance turns up at the door so they are quite high risk
gmisk wrote: » Because of how some people might perceive it I would guess. Look at the reaction of some people on here?
polesheep wrote: » I am neither perpetually annoyed nor a curtain twitcher. It didn't take long for FF to be back in power before the nepotism and cronyism came to the fore again.
polesheep wrote: » I am neither perpetually annoyed nor, a curtain twitcher. It didn't take long for FF to be back in power before the nepotism and cronyism came to the fore again, I've been waiting years to say that and that I Told you so! (despite that the master of the coombe has nothing to do with FF! I've never let logic and reason get in the way before and I'm not about to now!)
Melanchthon wrote: » For those complaining about the Nurse from Tip being used in the interviews, it's not about her magically being teleported to Dublin, it's about tying two stores together. As the Coombe gets a considerable amount vaccinated despite having a low risk patient base, Nenagh didn't get vaccinated despite having Covid patients.
gmisk wrote: » So you are arguing over two of the 120 spare vaccines? One works in a medical practice the other works in the hospital. "Two of the recipients are understood to be Dr O’Connell’s children, one of whom is college-going age, and is a paid part-time worker in his private medical practice. The other works intermittently in the hospital as an unpaid worker." So 120 vaccines spare, they found 104 people at short notice. 16 had to be found at ever shorter notice and of the other 16 - 9 were over 70... Would people rather they were just dumped? Honestly mountain out of a molehill imo.
Sleety_Rain wrote: » The way people have reacted to this is shocking. Seems people prefer the vaccine to be in the bin. Faux rage from lots of bored and angry people. I say fair play for being innovative and getting the vaccine into arms on a Saturday evening, after working expertly to extract more doses from the vials than expected.
Harry Palmr wrote: » Couldn't they have given the 16 to any admin who need to be onsite. How hard would that have been?
jill_valentine wrote: » I think it's rather telling that neither your originally quoted version of her story nor this summation of it mention that, once again, she's in Tipperary, a place quite famous for its distance from subject at hand.
titan18 wrote: » I disagree, we've a finite supply and they should be going to the hospitals dealing with covid in their first before hospitals that won't have covid cases in there. Sure, there's a chance the Coombe will get one, but that's the exact same as any hospital and it's not like the Mater Private (which has an A&E) has gotten their vaccines yet.
jill_valentine wrote: » That's a fair question - but not the question which was being asked by SteddyEddy, who specifically brought her up to challenge the assertion effort was made to contact surrounding hospital staff, and quite pointedly neglected to mention she was on the other end of the landmass.https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=115959709&postcount=285
Miike wrote: » If this is all so above board why would the Master of the Coombe publicly state he "deeply regrets" the decisions made?
steddyeddy wrote: » To you Gmisk, not the frontline workers who are complaining that they didn't get theirs.
gmisk wrote: » The frontline workers in the Coombe that were available for it.....got it.... The fact the Coombe is getting it before other hospitals is a totally different question imo.
[Deleted User] wrote: » We have the worst rollout of the vaccine in the developed world and plenty to be angry about. This seems like a case of not wanting to waste the vaccine, again, down to our abysmal rollout out rather than "it's not what you know, it's who you know..." (which we'll no need see plenty of in the coming months).
steddyeddy wrote: » There are many questions about this. My main question is why was there no back up list (even in paper form) of people who could get it in the case of leftovers?
ec18 wrote: » Sorry I fixed what you meant to say
Christy42 wrote: » Presumably they had some form of list if they got 104 people in quickly.
steddyeddy wrote: » It's unheard of in any vaccination program not to have a list.
silver2020 wrote: » Something like this happened in America and the doctors were congratulated. Here the are ostracised by the "affected" fucwits / covid police.
seamus wrote: » The maternity hospitals have all had Covid-positive cases in them, and unlike other hospitals they don't have the luxury of being able to bounce patients to a covid ward in another location. They just have to isolate and do their best. If a woman in labour is positive, the staff who are currently available have to deal with it. They don't have specific covid-ward staff to deal with it. Arguably this put maternity staff higher up the chain than regular frontline staff since they are at risk of being in contact with a case at any time.
is_that_so wrote: » There are a few layers to this story -the hospital being in line for vaccinations -the number of extra shots and how they filled those slots -the 16 and how they filled those slots
runawaybishop wrote: » The HSE would be responsible for that no? They contacted the HSE, as per the article.
gmisk wrote: » -the hospital being in line for vaccinations(I have no idea how that is decided, do you?)