DavidX90 wrote: » 100% agree. I won't be stopping until there is an acknowledgment and an apology from the LSI, and a written pledge that this will never happen again.
maggie95 wrote: » Have just submitted a complaint to the Ombudsman myself. Included a plethora of emails that I sent in to the Law Society over the last number of months, which of course received no response, and emails to my TD about the situation. Also included their posts here to show their method of "communication". I'm fed up of the same nonsense happening year in year out, this year especially was truly outstanding in terms of inefficiency and incompetency. Every time we complain, start a petition, or garner any kind of debate/support outside of Boards, the Law Society attempt to appease us by releasing statements or tweeting about results dates. We then tend to forget it happened because of that appeasement (naturally) and the exact same thing happens for the next candidates. This shouldn't be the case, I am committed to seeing this through now. It really will be about the amount of noise we can make, so if you feel the same way about the Law Society as I do, then please email your TD, submit a complaint to the Ombudsman, ring Joe Duffy, do whatever so we don't have to deal with this bulls*t again.
ALK2! wrote: » For anyone interested- I submitted a complaint to the ombudsman re: the Law Societies actions since September 2020 to date through the Ombudsman (.ie) website. Any unanswered emails/ complaints to LS can be used as evidence. It's probably unlikely they will or can do anything to resolve our issues but if enough people submit a complaint about the same thing, it may bring attention to the incompetence and inefficiencies displayed by the Law Society year on year. In the complaint I mentioned- 1. LS confirming date of November exams only weeks before we were due to sit them, 2. logged out of two exams on multiple occasions, provided no extra time for the second exam and no response to emails regarding the difficulty for over 6 weeks, 2. unanswered queries through call and email, 3. delayed exam results leaving limited time to study for March, 4. misleading information concerning result dates, 5. continued avoidance of students who have paid for their service on the day they had outlined results would be released.
Fe7 wrote: » We might have the time and dates but this doesn't relieve the other issues we face time and time again. How many unanswered emails? How many marked exams with no coherent marking system? The upcoming march exams with no time to prepare for any failed prior exams? And my fave - trying to save face on social media before sending any correspondence to the actual individuals it affects.Make sure to sign (http://chng.it/r5CbZFdzgx) if you haven't and keep making yourselves heard to the media. We have traction now finally among us all. The solicitors before us pushed to ban the 3-exam pass rule which we can be thankful for. For ourselves and future candidates we deserve respect, communication, and change.complaints@lsra.ie - send any complaints and evidence to legal services regulatory authorityJoe@rte.ie - Joe Duffy Ombudsman (.ie) website
lawDani wrote: » https://www.change.org/p/the-law-society-of-ireland-holding-the-law-society-accountable-regarding-fe1-candidates?utm_content=cl_sharecopy_26799380_en-GB%3A4&recruiter=1173639316&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition
Fe7 wrote: » The link doesn't seem to work for me!
lawDani wrote: » http://chng.it/h84yPTvBD
LawLearnin wrote: » They've just posted a tweet about the results: "Results from the November 2020 FE-1 sitting will be released at 11.00am on Thursday 14 January. Candidates will receive an email today with details about how to log on. Further updates will also be published to lawsociety . ie / fe1exam Thanks to students for their patience."
Fe7 wrote: » ****
Mc96 wrote: » 11 am Thursday 14th January - update on the website