Dub81 wrote: » It's like talking to a brick wall trying to reason with those on here who are clearly anti pub, numerous times ive asked for evidence to show that pubs are the cause of outbreaks to be produced and of course they cant because none exists,it's all opinions and what ifs, sorry lads that doesnt cut it.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » I definitely got her name wrong! Jess something I think? The one who organized the event in the pub in Dublin
Dub81 wrote: » It's like talking to a brick wall trying to reason with those on here who are clearly anti pub, numerous times ive asked for evidence to show that pubs are the cause of outbreaks to be produced and of course they cant because none exists,it's all opinions and what ifs, sorry lads that doesnt cut it. But you can all sleep well tonight knowing that these dangerous covid hotspots that are pubs are to close again and more people will be out of work yet again. Good afternoon :eek:
hynesie08 wrote: » Do you know the difference between outbreaks and cases? Also considering there are over 200 cases related to the afters of a funeral, that article is outdated. And calling out twitter links but using the sun as your source?? Cmon man.....
giveitholly wrote: » Oh yeah remember that during the summer wasn't it in the Berlin bar I think
Bass Reeves wrote: » D2 Berlin pub
Bass Reeves wrote: » We exited lockdown less than 20 days ago. Two biggest changes were pub and restaurant reopening and retail reopening. Numbers have climbed expodentially since at a much higher rate than ever before. This time we cannot say testing and tracing is having an effect. Pubs are much more likely to be the cause rather than any other source. Evidence is clear that gastro pubs that opened acted more like pubs than as pub restaurants. There is glaring evidence that many served drink without food.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Was the situation with Jess Brennan not an example and evidence of what can/did happen?
weldoninhio wrote: » How do you know they aren't related to the actual funeral?? Does the holy spirit protect you in church?? No, couldn't be that, has to be the afters.
weldoninhio wrote: » The event with 30/40 people at it that was hugely blown out of proportion??
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Realistically, what do you think is most likely?
Shanotheslayer wrote: » That's not what was asked though? It wasn't asked how many people etc, it was to show evidence. That is evidence of a pub not following the procedures.
bladespin wrote: » That's very circumstantial tbh, we can assume such but there's no evidence to prove it, you'd hope that there's be some seriously heavyweight evdience behind shutting a business down, a little more than that anyway.
weldoninhio wrote: » Berlin Bar isn't a pub. It has a theater license.
weldoninhio wrote: » There's a lot of hugs and hands shook at a funeral.
6 wrote: » I know some. Plenty were at it. It's always a few that **** it up for the rest.
Bass Reeves wrote: » Social distancing is church is observed at all church services. Numbers are limited to either 25 or 50 in an area that can often seat 300+. Empty seats between rows and groups seated separately. Nothing to do with divine protection. Pubs have shown a scant regard for the rules just haul it in as fast as possible. As well looking at countries that have left pubs and restaurants open all struggled to control the virus. The UK and NI are great examples
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Pedantic.
weldoninhio wrote: » Have you seen the likes of Penneys etc?? People all over each other. I haven't seen people that close in a gastropub without being warned/asked to leave.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Absolutely, entirely possible. But again you didn't answer my question. What do you think is realistically more likely?
bladespin wrote: » Not a bit, they've shown a disregard for their licence, many publicans would be much more careful, it's a huge difference IMO.
weldoninhio wrote: » We are talking about a specific funeral that apparently had 2/300+ people at it
weldoninhio wrote: » A virus doesn't care about likely. If Person A shakes hands with Person B (bereaved), and spreads the virus, then Person B shakes 100, 200 other peoples hands it'll spread like wildfire in an allegedly packed church.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » I'm aware. So no need to waste your time explaining it. The fact you are choosing not to answer it would indicate to me that most likely you think it's actually the pub were it probably transmitted because, lets be honest, it sort of makes sense given alcohol being involved and the higher likelihood of interaction. It will be impossible to ever know, but educated guesses are the best anybody can do in those situations. I'm sure the pub has CCTV? So I'm sure if they were all following procedure the pub will just release the CCTV and there will be no issues?