Henryq. wrote: » Usual car crash Doctors nurses and pharmacists are going to be trained to administer the virus lolhttps://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/1215/1184439-covid19-vaccination-plan/
Peregrinus wrote: » The training to administer the vaccine has little to do with the actual administration of the injection. Doctors, nurses and pharmacists already have that skill. It'll be more to do with handling and preparation of the vaccine - few of them will have experience of how to deal with a drug that is stored at -70, or that needs to be diluted with normal saline before administration, like the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine
olestoepoke wrote: » Universities have had hand sanitiser stations for years before covid. Why is it OTT? They should stay in high traffic areas.
Henryq. wrote: » Looks like we're slow playing the vaccine rollout They're talking early summer before everyone is vaccinated
CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » I dont think anyone expects it to be sooner than that. It all depends on how many vaccines candidates get through the trials. I think it's very likely to say that Pfizer and Moderna will. I'm not sure about AstraZeneca as there was a tiny amount of people doing the trial of the better dosage regimen. They may need to redo trials which could take a long time to get enough results. As to the others we are still waiting for results. If it's just Pfizer and Moderna it will take the full year to get through the population.
is_that_so wrote: » Johnson and Johnson may report Phase 3 trial data in January and if it's good would move to get approval. If the Oxford anomalies can be resolved that will ready too. There's also CureVac in Phase 3 in Germany, plus a Novavax Phase 3 trial expected to start this month in the US.
iamwhoiam wrote: » Nurses and pharmacists have been diluting IM and IV medications with saline for years .
iamwhoiam wrote: » I think airports and rail stations etc should have hand sanitizers as a norm .
is_that_so wrote: » It's doubtful we'll get that far by April, by June or July absolutely, but along with some level of restrictions. That said, they need a far more sophisticated level of communication than one that sounds like vaccines are not the end of this. That's not the way to encourage people to sign up for it.
leahyl wrote: » Like, I’m curious, was this always the way it was going to be, that we will still need restrictions even after most people are vaccinated because if so, what is the point of the vaccine??! This is what I just don’t understand! It’s like some medical professionals want it to keep going; depressing stuff
is_that_so wrote: » I think we were always going to see them for some of 2021, until we see cases fall off completely and most people vaccinated. It's hard to say when exactly that will be but personally hoping it will be from March/April onwards. I think the message on vaccines at present is understandable, a poor one IMO, but ultimately counterproductive as it will make people ask why bother with them.
leahyl wrote: » I honestly think they are just being cautious so that when most people are vaccinated by late April they can say “we are ahead of schedule”! Hopefully...! :-P
Gael23 wrote: » If people see that restrictions remain after they get the vaccine they just wont bother with it
Micky 32 wrote: » MM seems to be a bit more optimistic than Tony’s best buddies : But we have a plan in place now. We have a plan to roll out and it will be a collective national effort as a very significant additional tool to deal with Covid-19 and getting people's lives back to normal again," Mr Martin added.
CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » No date in that quote. He could mean christmas 2021 there for all you know.
Goldengirl wrote: » You do realise it's not their fault ( if any exists) that the vaccine is not approved yet ?