graememk wrote: » The current versions of V2G all the hardware for taking DC from the batteries (inverter etc etc) is fixed in the house, so it can just act like a standard grid tied storage inverter and can monitor house usage and balance as necessary Besides, you dont want to be carrying all that extra weight in the car!
Water John wrote: » Just shooting the breeze on it but say one had a 73kwh and charged it full with PV solar by day, would it cope easily with running a house in the evening?
pdpmur wrote: » ... but potentially very useful for vehicle-to-house - so during hours of peak rate electricity costs the battery could supply the house, and then re-charge from the grid during off-peak hours. The car battery doubles-up as temporary "fixed" battery storage for the house at no extra cost.
ELM327 wrote: » I think this is as useful as V2G tech (ie not at all)
innrain wrote: » https://www.electrive.com/2020/12/02/hyundai-presents-e-gmp-electric-car-platform/ Beside the marketing drama something else caught my eye Vehicle-to-vehicle charging that sounds desirable. Interesting enough is a 800V platform
Black_Knight wrote: » With that font, I'll never be able to take Phil's posts seriously from now on.
graememk wrote: » If you take out the ones at lifford, one near omagh (mellon country inn) and the one just outside enniskillen a big hole appears... (As they are chademo only (and 22kw ac) )
ELM327 wrote: » Not great but hardly brutal!
Black_Knight wrote: » Is that shareable on drive? Be a nice one for the new chargers sticky thread.
innrain wrote: » Very nice way of ranking. Question about the 0.25 on the standards. How you come up with it? Is it any algorithm behind it? Also in my thinking the multi-charger sites should have a higher weighting constant. I will think of it more but my half baked idea is that if you have 1/3 chance to find the charger occupied and add another charger overnight the probability does not halves to 1/6 but drops as 1/3 x 1/3 = 1/9. So n chargers would have 1/(3^n).
ELM327 wrote: » That specific moneygall location is supply limited to about 40kW peak across the charger. EG if AC and DC are in use both get about 20.
Kramer wrote: » This. Take the M7 towards Limerick, south of Portlaoise. Two chargers, Roscrea & Nenagh, are several kilometres off the motorway. Detouring to Roscrea would take close to 10 minutes & if it was ICE'd, or in use, you'd waste both time & range driving to it. The exact same in Nenagh. So if the only service area charger (Moneygall) was occupied, you'd be off driving around like a fool.A hub, even two units, at the Moneygall location would be better than the three on that stretch now, as they are all single units, single point of failure.
innrain wrote: » Also in my thinking the multi-charger sites should have a higher weighting constant.
Cyrus wrote: » just as an FYI when went parknasilla in the summer i was able to use a granny charger whenever i wanted, there were outdoor plugs at the woodland villas.
((Rapids * 1.0) + (22kW * 0.25) / Distance) * 100
slave1 wrote: » Ah, NorthWest is brutal
MJohnston wrote: » Here's my very rough summary of the charging capabilities of the major intercity routes on the island of Ireland: I'm including any non-Tesla charger that's online on the main route, or about 1 or 2km offline. Tried not to include any that are in train stations or wherever there wouldn't be easy access. Also only including one set of chargers per direction where there's an Applegreen or Ionity set on each side of a motorway. Also not including what's available in the cities themselves. Score is: ((Rapids * 1.0) + (22kW * 0.25) / Distance) * 100
ELM327 wrote: » The coverage of the island is now pretty universal. The only issue is still SPOF. (1 charger per site).