tommytimber wrote: » Would people think this is safe for company or should I add more? - Reforms - SLP - Corporate Authority - Shares and Share Transfer - Shareholder Protection - Director's Duties - Restriction & Disqualification - Corporate Borrowing
Iso_123 wrote: » Is anyone else feeling completely burnt out? I am incredibly tired but whenever I'm not studying I get study guilt I'm lucky that i had loads of time off work to study so I'm mostly just on revision now for the last while and finished covering new topics(except for constitutional which is never ending...) but I feel like I've been studying since the womb at this stage
Fe1new4 wrote: » For professional negl in tort, anyone covering solicitors negligence or just focusing on medical?
jus_me wrote: » I’ve covered solicitors it’s short
Reya10 wrote: » COMPANY Could anyone help me understand priority of debts in liquidation I've confused myself no end. So section 617(2) says that costs and expenses incurred in winding up including liquidators costs are to be paid in priority to all other claims, however in my manual and in a sample answer the priorities are listed as follows: • Retention of title contracts • Property held on trust returned • Property subject to equities • Third party insurance • Set off mutual debts between creditor and company • Costs of creditors proceedings • Secured creditors (fixed charge holders) • Judgment creditors • Liquidators costs • Preferential creditors: Revenue Commissioners get 1 years assessed tax, Company employees are paid and Rating authority is paid • Floating charge holders are paid • Unsecured creditors are paid, if the assets are insufficient they are paid pari passu • Members and contributories are paid So why are liquidators costs way down this list if section 617 says they should be paid first? Any insight appreciated, finding company law such a struggle
Fe123 wrote: » Is there any chapter in constitutional law which deals with restricting a persons rights in times of emergency? Just thinking covid wise it could be topical. Thanks
HU123 wrote: » I would also add professional negligence and affirmative duties if you have time. There's been some recent SC cases in those areas and neither came up in the August papers.
HU123 wrote: » No problem, for omissions there is the UCC v ESB case which you can also use for liability of public authorities.
StabiloLaw wrote: » Anyone have any thoughts about leaving out Crystallisation in Corporate Borrowing since it was just up?
nicolesd wrote: » are people leaving out product liability and nervous shock or including them? or would it be best covering product liability and leaving out occupiers liabilty since ocupier liabilty was up in august online?
ihatethesea wrote: » I'm the same, exhausted! I'm really struggling with Tort! I haven't had much time off so i'm only half way through revising my notes. I'm a good crammer but I feel like im drowning in this one! Tryna stay positive
nicolesd wrote: » also i feel very dumb asking this but to establish a duty of care do you have to use glencar test and go through each element of the test like proximity,forseebility fair just and reasonable and give examples of cases which show these and then establish if one is owed or how would ye approach it?
maewest19 wrote: » Bit of a weird question, but do you think we will be allowed talk to ourselves in the exam? I feel like if i'm not allowed to jot down an essay outline, I will need to talk myself through it! Sort of it plan it out loud, if that makes sense. I really don't find the sticky note feature helpful.
nicolesd wrote: » do we just say out loud to the camera if we need to use the bathroom or do we have to get permision first does anyone know? also do we have to bring the laptop in first to prove theres no cheating or whatever in there does anyone know?
WesternC123 wrote: » the link for the tort exam is up on better examinations but says we only have 3 hours to complete the exam??
nicolesd wrote: » can anyone confirm was occupiers lib up in august online paper?
