IgoPAP wrote: » Am I broken or does the mortgage chapter not make sense to anybody else? All I can understand are the rights of mortgagers/mortgagees.
shaunadennyham wrote: » It came up in the physical sitting in august so yea could prob leave it out
StabiloLaw wrote: » I've covered all of the above except Receivership and Corporate Authority- does anyone know if these are essentials or would I be typically ok to leave these out?
Spreece wrote: » Why leave it out? It’s tiny and would be such a handy part of a question.
legallyginger wrote: » Sorry if this sounds really stupid but seen somebody earlier mention Candidate Id Number...where do we get this?
Iso_123 wrote: » Does anyone know for this sitting can we tab legislation? I know we were allowed in march but I was convinced that it said that we were allowed on the permitted legislation PDF from the LS website for march and I don't see anything about it on the PDF now?
ihatethesea wrote: » Does any kind soul have even pictures of the August 2020 Tort paper? I would be so grateful!
Spreece wrote: » Receivership is handy enough and has about a 1 in 3 hit rate. So you should cover it. It’s always examined the very same way so easy to prepare for.
nmurphy1441 wrote: » How did all the people that say property in March find the new examiner with regards to marking?
moeby wrote: » Does anyone have upcoming exams on the BetterExaminations website? I still have nothing there. I am sure its fine but just want to double check. Thanks
LS3 wrote: » Can someone help me out and tell me what topics they are studying for constitutional. Im currently looking down the barrel of trying to learn 30 chapters
Shonagoring123 wrote: » sorry I’m advance if this is easily answered but does anyone know who is doing company law if the whole risk score is taking into consideration our legislation? You may form a whole answer on it and Especially for DD you’ll be using it so much you’ll constantly have your head in it?