HotDudeLife wrote: » I don't even know where to begin, i am assuming troll because i never encounter such delusional brain washed feminine men IRL.
HotDudeLife wrote: » #BrazzersLifesMatter
HotDudeLife wrote: » Posters like Tax would want you to believe gender is a social construct, these people are dangerous to humanity.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Lot of literal **** around if sites like these are doing good business. Lonely men sitting at home playing with themselves. The internet was a terrible invention in many ways.
paw patrol wrote: » I admire your shamelessness in getting your emmetspice account to continually like your posts even after you have been rumbled (think it was omackeral deserves the hat tip) another post by flash, another anti-male slant..you need to get a new hobby
paw patrol wrote: » although we are on the same side of the argument on this thread , i don't agree that an adult child's choice are a reflection of your parenting. You can't be accountable for another's choices even if they are your child - once they become an adult.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Citations needed. Perhaps what is "weird" is assuming that they see their work any different to anyone else? Most of us seem to want to continue to do the work that we do during the pandemic. I do not see a sex worker wanting to keep working as being any more or less weird than a masseuse doing so - or a hair dresser - or a bar man - or anyone else.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » I can’t help who likes my posts. What part of what I said is wrong? What is the target market for porn? It’s lonely and sad young men who masturbate to it. Many of them have to watch increasingly graphic porn to get their kicks, and develop extremely nasty views on women as a result. I’m not anti-male at all. I’m a fine example of one myself. All I’m saying is there’s nothing sexually liberating or liberal in general about trying to pull the flute off yourself to porn. It’s lonely, grotty; and sad. It’s the cynical exploitation of the performer and the viewer.
Pigsaw wrote: » I also have a very poor opinion of the porn industry but you are very naive to think it's only men using porn.
IAMAMORON wrote: » Some women do look at it, but it is not all that common. Women, in general, have a different scope when it comes to sexual arousal and what turns them on. It is far more common for women to enjoy a romantic or erotic novel and find that titillating. They tend to not dig hardcore pornography.
Mister Vain wrote: » It's easy to say that but what percentage of porn watchers are actually like that though? Would you say they're a majority or a minority? My guess would be the latter.
Pigsaw wrote: » My issue with Tax is his complete indifference to his daughter's future.
Pigsaw wrote: » He has no problem with her ending up in a brothel. Insane.
Pigsaw wrote: » Stupid comparison, beyond stupid. Why would a woman have sex with multiple sex every day in a pandemic? She's almost guaranteed to get infected.
Pigsaw wrote: » What, you think young women are getting their kicks from romance novels? What decade are you posting from? The 1950s?
Pigsaw wrote: » Some articles I've seen say women are more likely to search for the extreme stuff on Pornhub.
[Deleted User] wrote: » So are people who work in nursing homes it seems. Yet they went to work anyway. So shouting "stupid" at something does not magically make it stupid. In fact I think shouting "stupid" at things just means you have nothing to actually say. But stupid or not - that does not change the answer. Many people want to work. They want to continue to work even during a pandemic. Whatever their work may be. You might think it "stupid" - but whether it is or not - it still is what it is.
IAMAMORON wrote: » Pretty much. Most women i know find pornography revolting. They prefer moaning about unrequited crushes or the fact that they can't get the spends together for a pair of shoes they fancy. Women tend to not stay awake at night surfing the web looking for mickey. It is different for women who want sex, in fact a lot different.
IAMAMORON wrote: » Elaborate on extreme stuff please?
Pigsaw wrote: » Use your imagination.
Pigsaw wrote: » Now you're comparing nursing home staff with prostitutes?
Pigsaw wrote: » You can't see how having sex with multiple strangers everyday during a pandemic would be a bad idea?
Pigsaw wrote: » In fact it would be so monumentally stupid that you would only do it if you were forced to do it or had a drug habit to pay for?
Potential-Monke wrote: » I was going to do a detailed response, but I'm not going to feed the obvious trolls. Sad people with sad and ancient views...
IAMAMORON wrote: » Some women do look at it, but it is not all that common. Women, in general, have a different scope when it comes to sexual arousal and what turns them on. It is far more common for women to enjoy a romantic or erotic novel and find that titillating. They tend to not dig hardcore pornography. I have never met many women all that into pornography, even homosexual women. Whereas men of all persuasions are invariably goggle eyed over it. I am not saying they don't appreciate it, or even use pornography. But many women that I have know are not into it at all. Nothing to the same prolificacy as your average male.
TheDenialTwist wrote: » "far more common (for women) to enjoy a romantic or erotic novel". Really? What era are you living in? Or more importantly what era are these females you speak of living in? I presume the post is a joke? Or you've been misinformed by these women perhaps. As a female, with an extremely healthy sex drive. If I'm single or my partner has gone away or my rabbit has run out of batteries, what is a girl to do? Well according to your post... I guess I'll just order a romantic novel tonight and wait a week for it to arrive and delay gratification until then? As opposed to just putting on some porn. Great logic there. Makes absolute sense I don't know what kind of females you're interacting with, at home "fingering" the pages of their romantic novels eagerly anticipating when the climax to the story will "come". Maybe page 69 :pac: I certainly won't be ordering an "erotic novel" ever