Atlantic Dawn wrote: » If the vaccine has to be taken every year it's going to be a complete pain in the hole.
Wolf359f wrote: » Like the flu Vaccine? How is that a pain in the hole? I know it takes 10 mins out of your year to get. I'm sure being ventilated is quicker. And yes you maybe young etc... but you wont always be.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » 4.5 million people every year needing to be booked in, we can't even handle a fraction of that getting the flu vaccine.
Wolf359f wrote: » A fraction..... we're looking at about 2.1 mil flu vaccine doses being dispensed in the next month or so. That's nearly half the population vaccinated in a few months. There's no proof Covid is seasonal, so instead of a tight few months, we have 12, it's easily enough to have all vaccinated. Think of how many blood tests the doctors surgery and hospitals do each day (excluding the lab work behind that) We can easily roll it out on a large scale, the issue is the supply.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Are you sure the figures are that high, I couldn't even name 5 people I know would have it each year.
Hmmzis wrote: » For me it's even more basic than that. Being able to actually plan something for the future. Being able to hug my grandparents and parents would be a great thing. Having kids be be kids again. Having some stability in the economy would be nice as well. If any of the vaccines or treatments can get this thing down to HKU-1 or OC43 levels, it would be a resounding victory in my book.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » I thought the flu vaccine depends on the particular flu strain that is going around? It gives immunity to the particular flu strain, but if it's a different flu strain that goes around, that's where the vaccine doesn't work?
Gael23 wrote: » The shortage of flu vaccines makes me trust the HSE to make a mess of the Covid 19 vaccine
stephenjmcd wrote: » Nope doesn't given immunity, just reduces the chances of getting a bad dose. Effectiveness varies year to year
Gael23 wrote: » So the vaccine will stop severe illness which is all good but we will still have people in our communities carrying a highly contagious virus. How can you qbandon social distancing if that’s the case. Also some positive news in a vaccine although focused in the U.K. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-more-than-one-vaccine-will-be-available-early-in-2021-sage-scientist-says-12107285
irishgeo wrote: » Let's hope we continue our handwashing and people going to work sick. Employers need to step up to the plate and allow parents to work from home if the kids are off sick from school and not forcing sick employees into work.
Sir Jeremy Farrar, who sits on the SAGE committee, said: "I think in the first quarter of next year we will have vaccines - will have more than one vaccine."
Sir Jeremy was also optimistic about better treatments being ready before a vaccine, saying: "I do believe that monoclonal antibodies to treat patients and save lives will be available in the coming months."
Gael23 wrote: » Legislation is needed here. There is no obligation on employers t9 pay you when your off sick, many do but they don’t have to.
hmmm wrote: » Interesting quote in an article from the UK Times: "An MP who attended another briefing with Van-Tam said he was “very bullish about the third stage AstraZeneca results, which he expects between the end of this month and the end of next”. The MP said: “Van-Tam expects it to protect the elderly and vulnerable. He gave us to understand that it stopped the virus ‘shedding’ in the young. He said he would expect vaccination to start in January.”
Hmmzis wrote: » Whoa!!! The only way one can make such a claim is by having had a peek behind the blinders. If that is indeed the case and not just someone spouting random opinions, then it's good news. The question here is, if that's for the 1 or 2 dose regimens. If it's the one dose, then basically all other candidates are way overkill, if the two dose then all others (except Innovio maybe) should be grand as well. In any case, Novavax would be in the 'nuke it, nuke it from orbit' category.