schmittel wrote: » Eh? Why are my posts in bad faith?
schmittel wrote: » Are you saying you think the emails have been fabricated?
Eric Cartman wrote: » If don. Jr was selling access to his dad to fund his drug habbit even a tweet from a new account saying that would be enough for most of the people here saying the emails and pictures of hunter smoking crack are fake. Joe biden allowing his son to sell access is a serious issue.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » At the moment all evidence points to them being fake, this could be cleared up in a matter of minutes if they sent the originals emails to people who have asked for them so they can examine the data and confirm their legitimacy.
Deleted User wrote: » You don't find it a little odd that Giuliani won't provide the likes of USA Today with copies of the emails so they can verify them? If they can verify them, that's better for Trump.... On top of that the specific meeting didn't happen according to Biden. So we currently just have some screenshots of the most shocking content.
schmittel wrote: » Has anybody seen a Biden denial that the emails are true? i.e formal statement from Hunter Biden unequivocally saying - this is not my laptop, these are not my emails, they have been faked, I never sent or received any of those emails published in the New York Post. I have googled it, but got lost in a sea of Russian disinformation claims.
Faugheen wrote: » You opened with ‘I think Trump is a moron, as is Guiliani...’ And you have proceeded to do nothing but attack Biden and accuse him of corruption because of a private company’s decision to hire his son, all while the current a White contains pretty much the entire Trump family, who have access to confidential files and national security details. You haven’t a word to say about that, Just that the current situation with Biden stinks and you keep peddling the nonsense anytime someone argues with you. Then you, who had called Trump a moron, describe them as ‘Trump haters’. It is the very definition of bad faith. You are fooling nobody here.
Deleted User wrote: » Biden has specifically denied via his attorney that one of the bombastic meetings didn't occur.
schmittel wrote: » Have you got a link to that?
MadYaker wrote: » You realise that nobody has actually seen these emails? All anyone has seen is screenshots.
Gruffalux wrote: » I'd say Rupert Murdochs legal people have seen the emails. And the meta data. And the photos. And the videos.
schmittel wrote: » Sitting President employs his family? He gives them a leg up by giving them a cushy jobs in the White House. Not a good look, but presumably not illegal. Sitting Vice President with responsibilities for US policy on Ukraine gives his son a leg up by schmoozing Ukrainian businessman. Not a good look, and presumably illegal. Yes I think (if true) Biden's actions are worse than Trumps and happy to state so clearly. Nothing bad faith about that.
Deleted User wrote: » Here you go, it's pretty clearly implied that they're nonsense in general too. All Giuliani has to do is provide other news outlets with the emails to verify them. It would be a huge win for him and damage Biden's credibility. It's pretty telling when he won't.https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/feds-examining-if-alleged-hunter-biden-emails-are-linked-foreign-n1243620 "George Mesires, attorney for Hunter Biden, said in a statement, “We have no idea where this came from, and certainly cannot credit anything that Rudy Giuliani provided to the New York Post, but what I do know for certain is that this purported meeting never happened.”"
Gruffalux wrote: » A lot more than dodgy emails. 1000s of extreme photos and video footage and all verified to be from Hunter's laptop, and to be of Hunter, by Hunter's lawyer.
schmittel wrote: » Sorry I thought you meant a specific denial from Joe Biden's attorney - i.e somebody talking on Joe Biden's behalf - that this meeting never took place. That's what I am surprised about.
MadYaker wrote: » That’s a nice opinion. Why do you believe they actually exist, since we haven’t seen any proof?
osarusan wrote: » I haven't seen anything to that effect yet myself. Could you post up a link?
Gruffalux wrote: » Sky News Australia interviewed Steve Bannon a few hours ago. As I said I am not a fan of narcissist Bannon , quite the opposite, he sees himself as some kind of dharmic warrior acting out a vital role to rebalance the forces of good and evil in the world. I really find him unlikable and even dangerous. But I think he has the goods in this case. Hunter seems to be a squalid character. Anyways time will tell the truth. I could be wrong. But we shall see.
Phoebas wrote: » What? This is your response to a request for evidence of your claim that "A lot more than dodgy emails. 1000s of extreme photos and video footage and all verified to be from Hunter's laptop, and to be of Hunter, by Hunter's lawyer." You're giving us Steve Bannon in place or Hunter Biden's lawyer!! Are you not embarrassed with yourself?
Gruffalux wrote: » No.
Deleted User wrote: » Also in relation to the rest of your post, all Giuliani has to do is allow the emails to be verified by other news outlets. The NYP have shown no indications that they've even done some basic verification.
Gruffalux wrote: » Eventually the emails and all the rest will be verified. Or not. Buckle up, protonmike. We are on a weird ride.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » But why wait? Millions of Americans have already voted and continue to vote, why not get the evidence out there now to get as many Biden supporters to switch to your side. Instead when asked for the evidence we get nothing but very fake looking screenshot of alleged messages/emails.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
