Deleted User wrote: » You're missing the point. IF you believed the price was right, and assuming no fundamental change, then it makes sense to buy on the Dip. With that said, it falls down because nobody can fully know the share even with significant research. And it's a generalisation for sure, but there's a logic to it. Enjoy your cycle.
The Phantom Jipper wrote: » Does anyone have any site or source that they've found to be reasonably reliable for suggesting target prices?
[Deleted User] wrote: » It's the reverse of the buy decision? Why did you buy it at that price. If it goes beyond what you think is fair value then sell. Some stocks will remain relatively stable and people stay with them for Dividend purposes. The only "rule" I remember someone saying years ago was to sell at 40% gains regardless. But, that was just a personal choice of theirs.
The Phantom Jipper wrote: » One of the things I struggle with is coming up with an exit point for the stocks I'm in. Does anyone have any site or source that they've found to be reasonably reliable for suggesting target prices?
RIGOLO wrote: » You have NO IDEA who is on the opposite side of any trade. Irrespective of whether you belive in the fundamentals of a company or not, if the market makers have decided they want to bring it down, they will and they can and they can keep it down for a very very long time, longer than you can stay solvent.
Jim2007 wrote: » It should not matter who is on the other side of the deal. And if it does, then you are playing with penny stock and you should not even be there.
The Phantom Jipper wrote: » Aye I'd have a rough idea where I'd see it going when I buy after doing my due diligence but it's nice to have a shortcut to check in from time to time to see if my exit price is still realistic or underamibitious. Yahoo and CNN do aggregations of analysts price targets but I find them to be a bit all over the shop.
RIGOLO wrote: » Tough day on the market . .dow,nasdaq,s&p all red Among many other things market has jitters over the stimulus bill not getting signed. but when your portfolio is still green when the broader market is red then you know all those penny stocks (:rolleyes:) and dips (;)) you didnt buy are working out just the way you planned...thank you LAKE, NCYT, NIO If variety is the spice of life, diversity is the essence of a portfolio. have a great powerhour everyone.
Shedite27 wrote: » Yeah having a great run for myself too, +15% in October and we're only halfway through. I underperformed in August when big tech had its massive run (Tesla, Apple), so nice to be getting the bounce.
[Deleted User] wrote: » IF you can buy in AHs it might be worth buying EDSA. Insiders released SEC records of buying significant Share Options at Market value just before close. I see huge growth for this company, wouldn't rule out a company buy out.
Shedite27 wrote: » No movement in Trade Desk yet but suspect that will take a hit tomorrow too
Jim2007 wrote: » Yea, you will eventually learn just how wrong you are.... but the problem is it will take you about thirty years.
Hedge fund short sellers target pandemic winners. Shares linked to home computing and gym equipment, grocery retail and healthcare soared when the pandemic forced countries into lockdown earlier this year. Many were lifted by hopes that changing behaviour and shopping patterns as a result of Covid-19 would feed through into stronger, long-term earnings growth, even though some companies have until recently been unprofitable. But some hedge fund managers are now betting against those stocks, in the belief that the boost to company earnings will fade away faster than many investors anticipate.
Mickiemcfist wrote: » Holy hell thats had a rough ride over the last few years
Kickstart1.3 wrote: » Good time to Buy Peloton so
RIGOLO wrote: » I will pass on PELOTON I am already heavily invested in bicycle stock, 11 at the last count, not including the kids. Yesterdays FT article certainly made me sit up and rethink. The FT is always prescient on what way the wind will blow down the road. It made me rethink the whole cloud market, will these unprofitable companies eventually be exposed like the Emperors new clothes. The 5G and IOT 'boom' we are promised, will it materialise or is it all locked in a 'proof of concept' cycle (TheReg wrote on this) but still 5G&IOT are far off from penetrating society. For now balance sheets dont matter to Wall St., maybe one day soon they will. But isnt that the game , there are no rules only profit.
Shedite27 wrote: » I hate the word "cloud". Every synopsis of a company you read now has "cloud based" in the first 10 words. It's a bit like saying "uses technology" at this stage. Every modern company has moved to cloud now. In the end it boils down to what the company does. Remove the words "cloud-based solution" and see if the company still makes sense. With regards to 5G, I agree we're miles off getting benefit from 5G. Does it really matter that I can watch cat videos without buffering in Dublin? Coz that's all 5G is gonna do in 2020/21. The real benefit of 5G hasn't even been developed yet. - allowing cars to talk to car companies in real time to aid driverless cars. - ensure constant speed to allow a surgeon in Europe perform an operation via robots on a patient in America. - allow police cameras to be consistently monitored in real time to prevent crimes before they happen. - traffic lights that can be adjusted remotely to allow for traffic flow. All these are done to some extent at the moment but 5G will give us the consistency for these to be commonplace and reliable. I'm sure Elon Musk and Silicon Valley have ideas that we can't even fathom right now. 5G will be the infrastructure that allows their ideas come to fruition.
RIGOLO wrote: » I concur. To some degree its become a meaningless term at this point. They covered your exact point on CNBC SquakBox this AM, they got to the point where they were discussing if they themselves the 'physical presenters' were in the cloud. I love when they just riff stream of conciousness on whats happening in the market and go off on tangents. Looks like the market are following our lead, who knew Boards was so trendsetting . FSLY is taking a big hit as are many tech and 'fluffy things in the sky' companies. 5G wil have benefits but the jurys out on when, its like many silicon valley creations .. Its a great solution looking for a problem! GLTA .. pay heed , the hedge funds and shorts are coming for your lunch money and there are no teachers around . afternoon cycle time.. portfolio is green so far lets see how much we lose on this spin when the US opens
Shedite27 wrote: » Been a good one to buy the dips. Since July it's gone $78 - $102 - $78 - $116 - $78 - $95 - $78 - $95. You can see where it's got very solid support, will break out north eventually (probably once the moving averages catch up)
Shedite27 wrote: » I hate the word "cloud". Every synopsis of a company you read now has "cloud based" in the first 10 words. It's a bit like saying "uses technology" at this stage. Every modern company has moved to cloud now. In the end it boils down to what the company does. Remove the words "cloud-based solution" and see if the company still makes sense.
Shedite27 wrote: » Updating my Fastly tracker, YTD is now...$78 - $102 - $78 - $116 - $78 - $95 - $78 - $128 - $86 (currently, might even bounce to $78 again today?)
DutchYurt wrote: » What's your thoughts, will it go lower or bounce back? I'm tempted to go in but think there might be some pain tomorrow
Nemeses2050 wrote: » In the same boat was hoping it would touch 78-79 levels, would just hold jumping today though. with Red everywhere, what are folks looking at? I'm down 5% this week
Kilboor wrote: » I'm still green on this red day, thank God for GameStop and Providence. Only thing I want to buy more of is UpWork as I've said before. Haven't had the time to research as much as I would have liked in recent weeks