L1011 wrote: » The last alcohol excise increase was 2013; the "old reliables" just became the "old reliable" of tobacco in recent years. I think that excise increase was actually just returning it to an older level as it had actually been cut to try help the sector in the crash; but I might be imagining that!
noby wrote: » What's also coming soon is a ban on price based promotions, and quantity discounts. What that means is, if you offer, say 24 cans of 500ml for €24, then if you also sell single cans of the same product they cannot be sold for more than €1. But if you sell, say slabs of 470ml cans, but don't offer the same product in lesser quantities, then quantity discount doesn't come into play. Or, you know, maybe they're just out of widgets, as the rep said...
Cocoon wrote: » Nothing more satisfying than a nicely poured pint, this can't be achieved with a smaller can. Makes no sense.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » There is only 1 solution to this. Book a return flight to Australia, quarantine for 2 weeks in a hotel at your own expense, then head into the city and buy yourself a scooner glass and then fly home. Then you can pour the Guinness and it will be a full glass.
Effects wrote: » The trick is to add water to the glass first, then pour the Guinness, and it'll reach the correct level.
begbysback wrote: » If you can’t put the price up, then put the quantity down.
Open the Pubs wrote: » Isn't there minimum pricing coming soon too? Although from what I gather this will affect the Tesco cider and Dutch Gold drinkers rather than Guinness?
Open the Pubs wrote: » Why must we be such a nanny state and try to ban everything,
tobsey wrote: » You lose just over a can in the 24. I'm surprised it took them this long to do it. The widget meant the guinness cans were always bigger. Now I guess they are standard 500ml cans but the widget takes up some space.
the beer revolu wrote: » 500ml good 568ml good
rubadub wrote: » Just wondering if the 470ml can is the same height as regular 500ml cans of non-widget beers. Might be handier for can stacking, printing, shrinkwrapping etc. guy saying/wondering similar here