Dravokivich wrote: It's just a website, why do you need an app to function as a html wrapper, when you can just use a web browser?
bobbyss wrote: » Html wrapper? What in the name of God is that?
bobbyss wrote: » So on a mobile for a few weeks there's no history available. No app available to check your history. Why in rhe name of God don't they have one? Seems ludicrous.
bk wrote: » HTML is the main language that websites are written in. HTML Wrappers are poor apps, which take the website and wrap it as an app, but really they are still just the website and offer nothing more then what the website offers. Such apps are pointless, it is easier to just go to leap.ie, then install an app like this. Native apps are only worth it if they can offer some extra functionality over what the website can offer. The Leap topup app is an example of this, as it does something (topup your card) that the website can't do. There are actually a number of Third Party Leap "HTML wrapper" apps available for iPhones if you want. But note, that means giving your username and password to a third party and giving them access to your travel data. I don't think there are any on Android.
bk wrote: » Yes, they are currently developing a new app for iPhone to enable topup's from iPhone. Perhaps they could add this functionality to this app then. However keep in mind, that the data on the website doesn't accurately represent the state and balance currently on the card. It can take up to 48 hours for transactions to appear on the website, so it can be somewhat misleading. The Topup App showing you your cards balance and 5 last transactions is actually far more accurate then the site as it shows the true current state of the card. So the data on the website is really of very little benefit to most people and probably not worth making a lot of effort integrating it into the app. Having said that, I do think it is a pity that you can't export the data as a spreadsheet or do other graphs and statistics to show your monthly/yearly spend, etc. Could be helpful to see if worth getting taxsaver cards, etc. With the project to move to next generation account based ticketing, I do expect they will put a lot more effort into the mobile apps. In the meantime, an iPhone topup app is the most useful app they can create IMO.
Dravokivich wrote: » Account based is a long way off. And its unclear if you think that means web account. Account based means a relationship to an account in the leap back end for the NFC device in use, be it a bank card / phone/ watch or whatever gets implemented as the authenticator. It has nothing to do with the website or a payment method for the leap card.
Stephen Strange wrote: » The website should become more up to date with the introduction of the iPhone app though, shouldn't it? I was under the impression that the iPhone app was to coincide with moving the transactions to account based rather than on the card if that makes sense, I'm not explaining it well.
bk wrote: » 2) Commuter Ticket App Last year, the NTA contracted with Cubic Systems to develop an app to allow people to buy tickets on their phone and then show them as QR codes on the phone to the driver/ticket checker. This is aimed at long distance services like Irish Rail and BE. I think this app is already developed and it is currently in beta testing.
bk wrote: » 1) iPhone Leap "Topup" App The NTA seem to have already issued or about to issue a contract to a company called Vix Technologies for the development of this app. This is basically a copy of the existing Android "Topup" App, but for iPhone. You can hold your existing Leap card to your iPhone and the app allows you to check the balance on the card, view the last 5 transactions, add cash and tickets to the card. Just like the Android app that has been there for the past 4 years. This isn't part of the next generation ticketing account.
bk wrote: » 3) Next Generation Account Based Ticket This is a much bigger overall project then the above two, a complete revamping of the whole ticketing system. Moving to account based ticketing, Apple/Google Pay, contactless cards, etc. Suppose to take the next 7 years or so.
markpb wrote: Why is the OP getting such abuse? The vast majority of apps do nothing that a decent website couldn’t and yet apps are popular with users. For a lot of people, using your phone means using apps.
Peregrine wrote: » It's a big project, of course, but I think most of the benefits to passengers will be very front-loaded. Contract yet to be awarded but I'd expect contactless, G Pay/Apple Pay and 90 min fare by 2022. They said it'll start in 2021 but the tender was supposed to go out in early 2020 and that only happened two weeks ago.
bobbyss wrote: » What's interesting and disappointing is the first poster who replied, a moderator I believe, either didn't read or ignored the first five words of my post.
Dravokivich wrote: I didn't ignore any of your post. What was your problem with my response?
bobbyss wrote: » What's with all this defensive language: 'What was your problem... .? ' Just read the first post and then read your post.
devnull wrote: Secondly if you have a problem with a post or think it breaks the rules, you should report it to us and we will take a look and whether action needs taking.
legend99 wrote: » I always thought a major aim of a Smart Card for transport was to help speed up the loading of passengers. I find it incredible that Leap has actually slowed it down. You still have to tell the driver your destination so he knows what fare to charge. She/He then, it appears to me, has to set the machine to charge that much, and the card takes upwards of 5-8 seconds to give it the okay? Is there a lookup back to the actual database or how can it take so long for the card to report its balance? And why do we not just have a system where you deduct your fare while waiting, like for Luas, and then just walk straight onto the bus. The monetary cost of buses wasting so much time loading must be enormous??
AndrewJRenko wrote: » You need to tag on AND tag off on the Luas.