whatawaster wrote: » I am proof that weight loss is all about diet and not exercise. Barely moved this week (my knee has been at me) but staying pretty disciplined with my calories.
Hodors Appletart wrote: » ........... I've cut out drinking Sun-Thurs, ................... so how does the following look Breakfast - 3 egg omlette with ham and 3 cherry tomatoes (about 60g of ham which is from a joint I'd bake on a sunday, which is also for my son's lunches) Lunch - brocolli (stems and florets), a carrot ribbonned, a third of a pepper, a few mushrooms, kale or other leafy green, some garlic, chili flakes, soy sauce, fish sauce, lime juice and vinegar and a chicken breast trimmed of fat (or turkey steak) all stir fried (no oil) Dinner - whatever is on - pasta bolognese, meat & 2 veg etc "normal dinner" various Americano coffees through the day (never milky coffee) and about 2 litres of water.
TheFactMan wrote: » Track what your eating, figure out how many calories that is and - 200 off it till u start losing weight at a reasonable amount, Get a Gym routine going and stick with it, Be patient it ll work over time, adjust your diet as needs to continue the weight loss, Dont go OCD with the tracking or any of that roughly will do you and just enjoy the journey it ll take you a while b you ll be improving a little bit every day.
Augeo wrote: » Diet looks grand, likely a decent calorie deficit. Do you plan on drinking Fri and Sat?
Hodors Appletart wrote: » ............ how do I work out the calories?...........
Hodors Appletart wrote: » I've started a "food diary" so I'm tracking it. how do I work out the calories? I'll deffo stick with the gym, I'd rather 3 days than 2 so I want to ask about that. I'll probably have 3-4 cans of beer on each of those nights.
Hodors Appletart wrote: » ok thanks, that's helpful what you've listed out there is approx 1800-1850kcal I think.
TheFactMan wrote: » ......... alot of this info is well over the top and not really needed. Too much information can be worse than none at times!
Augeo wrote: » If you are referring to calories anyone trying to lose weight should have an appreciation of what they are eating in calories IMO. Bit of a stretch to go from calorie counting to this spiel "so knowing the micro difference of an avocado vs an apple at a molecular level and how insulin absorption is affected when doing handstands isnt going to do you any good!"
TheFactMan wrote: » Read my post before getting offended. The point i was making is blatantly clear.
TheFactMan wrote: » Try not to get too bogged down with all the sciencey side of things, you arent trying to be an Olympic athlete so knowing the micro difference of an avocado vs an apple at a molecular level and how insulin absorption is affected when doing handstands isnt going to do you any good! try keep things as simple and as easy to follow as possible. I know some users mean well but alot of this info is well over the top and not really needed. Too much information can be worse than none at times!
Augeo wrote: » I'm not offended at all........ You replied to / quoted this ......... with this...............
TheFactMan wrote: » Keep it in context there was other posts aswell, I was replying to the person rather the post , it was more a follow on from my original post. But what's your point exactly ?
Augeo wrote: » This was my point........
TheFactMan wrote: » Oh ok you misunderstood what I was saying.
TheFactMan wrote: » ................... I was replying to the person rather the post , it was more a follow on from my original post. .............
Augeo wrote: » No, more like you quoted the wrong post
TheFactMan wrote: » Well you some how got calories out of the bit you qouted which is impressive in it's self considering it's fairly obvious what I was getting at..............
TheFactMan wrote: » You realize that wasn't the only post made right ? The tread does go back beyond that post? .......
Augeo wrote: » It's 89 pages, folk generally don't quote posts when they are replying to the person rather the post FYI. If you quote a post the consensus will be you are referring to the content of it Simple really.
TheFactMan wrote: » It's litterally the page before it, you actually replied yourself on it , you're just trying to misunderstand it to have a go I can see what you are at.
Augeo wrote: » Not at all, it seems you quoted a post in error, that's fine I'm not at anything.
Hodors Appletart wrote: » hi guys I'm a heavy guy, not sure what weight exactly but I put on more in lockdown. I'm 178cm/5'10 and wear a 44inch waist jeans. i'm 40. I'm not active. I get no enjoyment from and cannot motivate myself to "go for a walk" - firstly it hurts my lower back, and secondly I get bored. I recently started a "fat dads" gym class, twice a week. I've cut out drinking Sun-Thurs, and I'd be eating peanuts or crisps every night, which is also gone. I've also had a look at my other meals. I thought I was great eating fruit and yoghurt for breakfast, turns out I'm not so how does the following look Breakfast - 3 egg omlette with ham and 3 cherry tomatoes (about 60g of ham which is from a joint I'd bake on a sunday, which is also for my son's lunches) Lunch - brocolli (stems and florets), a carrot ribbonned, a third of a pepper, a few mushrooms, kale or other leafy green, some garlic, chili flakes, soy sauce, fish sauce, lime juice and vinegar and a chicken breast trimmed of fat (or turkey steak) all stir fried (no oil) Dinner - whatever is on - pasta bolognese, meat & 2 veg etc "normal dinner" various Americano coffees through the day (never milky coffee) and about 2 litres of water.
Hodors Appletart wrote: » hey I was looking at your progress chart there, if I can get to somewhere like that I'll be happy. Very happy I had myself pegged at about 140kg alright, which is in around what you are suggesting. I absolutely know snacking was my downfall, full packets of sharing crisps, peanuts and jellies. I also know I was very carb heavy previously. Thanks for your post, it's encouraging to see someone similar to myself actually making their goals. I hope I'm back here in 35 weeks with the same success story