Danzy wrote: » African Americans die less per 100k arrests than Whites.
victims were majority white (52%) but disproportionately black (32%) with a fatality rate 2.8 times higher among blacks than whites. Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims.
When he was asked this week why Black people are “still dying at the hands of law enforcement” in the U.S., President Donald Trump responded by focusing on white people who had been killed by police. “So are white people. So are white people. What a terrible question to ask. So are white people,” Trump told CBS News in an interview on Tuesday. “More white people, by the way. More white people.”Northeastern professor Matt Miller says that Trump’s response was a “grotesque” misdirection that fails to account for the fact that Black people are killed by police at a higher rate than white people.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » At least as a republican Trump has not entered america in another war
ExMachina1000 wrote: » The old economy and employment rate weren't too bad either.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » True. But that is gone now.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » You are wrong. But I will leave it there. Plus we are in a pandemic i will leave you to work it out how other cases in other countries affect us.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Incorrect.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080222/ There are obv more white people arrested. But Black people have a fatality rate of 2.8 times higher. Yes there are other issues in the black community that also feed this issue. Or affect them in an entirely separate way.https://news.northeastern.edu/2020/07/16/the-research-is-clear-white-people-are-not-more-likely-than-black-people-to-be-killed-by-police/
Hande hoche! wrote: » One of the Watergate journalists expressed similar sentiment. It's a reasonable point.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » I heard Jordan Peterson say it also,
Limpy wrote: » If your black women but one parent was White, or if you were born to that women and had a White dad the mother and child are still considered black (African American). Why? They also identify that way for the majority. If a native American is the women is she native American or black AA. If an Asian is the women what is she, Asian or black AA? When white kids are born in America they don't call them Europeans for what the majority are.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » Also the police in the US shoot more white people than black people, but that is usually covered up as it does not suit the agenda .
Brussels Sprout wrote: » This old chestnut. Yes, in absolute numbers more white people then black people are killed by police in America. However, there are many times more white people than black people in America. When you look at the rates instead black people are killed in disproportionate numbers. Last year you were 3.6 times more likely to be shot to death by the police if you were black than if you were white.police shootings dataUS census data for race
The president’s desire to disentangle the country from costly overseas conflicts must be encouraged. Mr. Finer is an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Malley is the president and C.E.O. of the International Crisis Group. They served in the Obama administration. There is no shortage of policies and decisions made by President Trump worth criticizing, but since the earliest days of his presidential campaign, he has expressed at least one belief that deserves to be encouraged, not denigrated: the desire to disentangle the United States from costly overseas conflicts. Mr. Trump’s noninterventionist impulse has always fit uncomfortably with the team he assembled, particularly the latest, more hawkish iteration in his ever-shifting foreign policy cast. For a time, the President grudgingly deferred, allowing conflicts to escalate in virtually every theater he inherited.source
ExMachina1000 wrote: » There are many times less black people in America yet they commit a disproportionate amount of crimes. This leads to a disproportionate amount of interactions with the police. The stats show are there
ExMachina1000 wrote: » There are many times less black people in America yet they commit a disproportionate amount of crimes.
Brussels Sprout wrote: » And why is that?
ExMachina1000 wrote: » No idea. Why do you think it is? Getting back to my post. Do you agree with my statement?
Brussels Sprout wrote: » Nice deflection from an uncomfortable topic. Why should I give my opinion if you are unwilling to give yours? It's easy to attack posts. As for your statement which was "Blacks commit more crimes". I would counter that with the view that we you can't actually tell that to be the case. They certainly get charged with a lot more crimes and get heavier sentences. If cops need to fill their quotas for the month it's not the white neighbourhoods that they go to to start randomly searching teens for drugs possession or pulling over drivers for petty excuses. Nobody at the major banks went to jail for the criminally, negligent practices that caused the 2008 financial crash but Eric Garner was choked to death by the police while being arrested for selling loose cigarettes and George Floyd was choked to death while being arrested for trying to pass off a fake $20 bill. Kyle Rittenhouse shot two people dead and walked toward the police in surrender, with his rifle still in his hands, while people shouted follwed behind and shouted to the police telling him what he had just done. They ignored him entirely and he wasn't arrested until the next day in a different state. In contrast, Philando Castile was pulled over in his car while driving with his family and immediately informed the office that he had a gun in the car. They killed him anyway. If you're white in America it's a hell of a lot easier to commit a crime and not suffer the consequences then if you are black.
Danzy wrote: » Lots of reasons but it is largely a culture and values problem.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Why do they do this? I don't know I don't live in America.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » He has not succeeded yet in being able to disentangle the Americans from any of the wars they have gotten involved with and some of that has been bad hires such as John Bolton and James Mattis which have not helped either.Trump Is Right to Seek an End to America’s Wars By Jon Finer and Robert Malley There is one (and others) view within the US military that they are over extended, their equipment and men are being worn down in asymmetric warfare conflicts that they are not equipped to deal with and can't win and they can no longer fight a conventional war or sustain one. Hardy a surprise that tactics have changed going head to head on a conventional battlefield with the US army would mean certain defeat. Their motives though are not necessarily peace. The US military industrial complex is not one monolith, there is lots of politics and inter-service rivalry and fiefdoms built that are no longer fit for purpose but have budgets attached. The US military industrial complex is a beast that resists being reformed. There was a massive public relations campaign in the media to goad the public into supporting war using emotional propaganda to force the Americans to commit large forces to Syria using Samantha Powers responsibility to protect (R2P) doctrine, the weak minds of the Irish media - latest example Joyce Fegan are too gullible to realise that and continue to repeat that propaganda. US president Trump resisted the media pressure and I have no doubt Western media was acting on behalf of foreign intelligence services like the British and Saudis, he allowed a few token strikes at an air force base but did not go further, and has called for the withdrawal of US troops from Syria yet encountered resistance from domestic politicians and mainstream media. Trump is aware that his base has no interest in foreign military adventures and were he to do that he would definitely lose re-election, but so far he has been a failure in not ending any of the wars and permitting the stalemate to continue. Unfortunately its easy to start wars, it's not politicly easy to end them it takes lots of manoeuvring behind the scenes.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » It's not an uncomfortable topic to me at all. Blacks commit more crimes as per the stats. Why do they do this? I don't know I don't live in America. Talking about black crime and then going off about financial crises and bankers is nonsensical Do you live in America?
Brussels Sprout wrote: » That's convenient. Placing all the blame on the individual rather than the systemNothing to do with the chronic lack of investment in schools and healthcare Nothing to do with the red-lining of "nice" areas keeping the blacks out Nothing to do with disproportionate sentencing for traditionally black crimes vs whites ones (Crack cocaine vs powder cocaine sentencing for example) Nothing to do with gerrymandered electoral districts Nothing to do with locking people out of the GI Bill which was one of the greatest elevators of social status for white people in post-war America Nothing to do with food deserts in inner city areas I could go on but frankly it's depressing especially since there's no point in arguing with people who are willfully ignorant.
Brussels Sprout wrote: » I'm done