nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Beasty

No spitting, biting, gouging or uncivility allowed

First thread here

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

extra gravy

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

You can't rally behind Trump without a real life rally!

Trump has got to give his supporters what they want, and it's fairly evident that they want a Trump rally with the crowd that has formed outside!

*cringe*

Timberrrrrrrr

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

You can't rally behind Trump without a real life rally!

Trump has got to give his supporters what they want, and it's fairly evident that they want a Trump rally with the crowd that has formed outside!

Yeah, you can't account for that amount of stupidity.

Billy Mays

Oh Donnie :rolleyes:

https://mobile.twitter.com/ParkerMolloy/status/1301540686521667585

Any of the clapping seals on here getting sick at even the thought of it?

LessOutragePlz

Looks like it's possible that a QAnon supporter could be in congress soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XsaFuEXRV4

Billy Mays

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Looks like it's possible that a QAnon supporter could be in congress soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XsaFuEXRV4

Are you a QAnon supporter yourself?

Gerry Hatrick

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Yeah, called a woman "dog faced" - what a gent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwVrg6UtxXQ

Disgusting individual. Democrats could have done a hell of a lot better

mcmoustache

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

I'm not on here saying he's gent though now am I .. but as ever a criticism of Biden is met with a 'But Trump'.

When the criticism is about X thing and the other guy in a two-horse race does X thing more often and to a worse extent, it's to be expected.

I could understand your criticisms if they were due to a sincerely held opinion but when you excuse worse and more frequent poor behaviour from Trump, it doesn't come across as genuine.

LessOutragePlz

Billy Mays wrote: »

Are you a QAnon supporter yourself?

No but I sometimes check it for news and to see what is being discussed but, if I had to choose between voting for a Democrat or a QAnon supporter I'd vote for the QAnon supporter.

Timberrrrrrrr

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

Disgusting individual. Democrats could have done a hell of a lot better

Whats your thoughts on Don's insults to women?

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/trumps-worst-insults-toward-women-2018-10%3famp

You can now add "horseface" to the list of insults President Donald Trump has hurled at women publicly, which also includes "fat pigs," "slobs," and "dogs," to name a few

Tell me how

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

No but I sometimes check it for news and to see what is being discussed but, if I had to choose between voting for a Democrat or a QAnon supporter I'd vote for the QAnon supporter.

From Wikipedia

QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory alleging that a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles running a global child sex-trafficking ring is plotting against President Donald Trump, who is battling them?

Do you believe the above statement is true?

[Deleted User]

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

No but I sometimes check it for news and to see what is being discussed but, if I had to choose between voting for a Democrat or a QAnon supporter I'd vote for the QAnon supporter.

Can you give an example of "news" you got via QAnon?

Tell me how

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

Disgusting individual. Democrats could have done a hell of a lot better

He's still a better choice than the incumbent, who suggested his Press Secretary 'take one for the team' when it appeared a dictator found her attractive.

Think about that statement and how off the charts crazy it is, and then remind yourself that it is true.

Gerry Hatrick

What the hell is QAnon?

LessOutragePlz

Tell me how wrote: »

From Wikipedia

Do you believe the above statement is true?

I'd have to do more research on the topic to be able to make an informed decision on whether that statement is true or not.

Gerry Hatrick

Tell me how wrote: »

He's still a better choice than the incumbent, who suggested his Press Secretary 'take one for the team' when it appeared a dictator found her attractive.

Think about that statement and how off the charts crazy it is, and then remind yourself that it is true.

Two pathetic candidates. Truly sad that it's come to this for America. I couldn't separate them they are both just so poor.

Tell me how

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

What the hell is QAnon?

This one is for you LessOutragePlz

All of us are dying to see your answer.

Tell me how

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

Two pathetic candidates. Truly sad that it's come to this for America.

You'll find no argument from me in that respect.

But if I had a vote, it would most definitely be going to Biden.

Muahahaha

Quin_Dub wrote: »

Someone should have a word with those "Normal Regular people" so

Bidens support has increased in Wisconsin since the start of all the trouble there and Trumps has declined..

And in the 6 Polls taken in Wisconsin since the Blake incident the Biden lead is as follows

Biden 50% , Trump 42% - 8%
Biden 49% , Trump 41% - 8%
Biden 52% , Trump 42% - 10%
Biden 53% , Trump 42% - 11%
Biden 51% , Trump 43% - 8%
Biden 53% , Trump 40% - 13%

Hmmm???

Thats quite a commanding lead Biden still has in Wisconsin, even at the lower 8% it is well outside the margin of error. Trumps law and order message targeting suburban moms doesnt seem to be resonating. Suburban moms are more concerned about the virus than they are about the unrest in Kenosha. And if anything they see Trump as part of the reason for the unrest. Trump needs to win this cohort but instead he seems to be alienating them.

LessOutragePlz

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

What the hell is QAnon?

Kind of hard to explain so you'll have to do your own research.

[Deleted User]

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I'd have to do more research on the topic to be able to make an informed decision on whether that statement is true or not.

You get "news" from QAnon types but don't know what it is? You literally brought them up... Your researching skills are not existent.

Gerry Hatrick

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Kind of hard to explain so you'll have to do your own research.

I'll have a look. Thanks for the reply.

Leroy42

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

Two pathetic candidates. Truly sad that it's come to this for America. I couldn't separate them they are both just so poor.

I suppose it all depends on what you deem as important in a candidate.

What are you measuring them on? Because I cannot see how you could deem that it not possible to separate them.

Timberrrrrrrr

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Kind of hard to explain so you'll have to do your own research.

Like you did :rolleyes:

Tell me how

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Kind of hard to explain so you'll have to do your own research.

Did you get up this morning with the intent of demonstrating to everyone on Boards that you haven't a clue what you are talking about but desperately want to rail against any sort of reality or science based individuals or parties?

Because that is exactly what you have done.

ollkiller

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

You can't rally behind Trump without a real life rally!

Trump has got to give his supporters what they want, and it's fairly evident that they want a Trump rally with the crowd that has formed outside!

A rally during a pandemic. What a p***k.

Gerry Hatrick

Leroy42 wrote: »

I suppose it all depends on what you deem as important in a candidate.

What are you measuring them on? Because I cannot see how you could deem that it not possible to separate them.

Both ancient with obvious health issues. Both incredibly arrogant and rude. Both with little or no respect for working class Americans. Both prepared to play in the swamp to get ahead. Both make massive gaffs in front of the camera etc...

Terrible rubbish candidates

LessOutragePlz

Deleted User wrote: »

Can you give an example of "news" you got via QAnon?

It led me to this page and published the names of some of the people on the list before they were posted on that reddit page.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DivineRightOfKings/comments/cc3msy/here_is_a_list_of_all_us_politicians/

LessOutragePlz

Tell me how wrote: »

Did you get up this morning with the intent of demonstrating to everyone on Boards that you haven't a clue what you are talking about but desperately want to rail against any sort of reality or science based individuals or parties?

Because that is exactly what you have done.

Sometimes being in the minority is tough but you've got to try to be your own person and think for yourself.

"Don't be afraid of being different be afraid of being the same as everyone else."

extra gravy

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Sometimes being in the minority is tough but you've got to try to be your own person and think for yourself.

"Don't be afraid of being different be afraid of being the same as everyone else."

Think for yourself by watching shiite on youtube...sure.

Gerry Hatrick

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Sometimes being in the minority is tough but you've got to try to be your own person and think for yourself.

"Don't be afraid of being different be afraid of being the same as everyone else."

So true.