ELM327 wrote: » It espouses a typical masculine value of clinging to youth as you are aging. Same as buying a flash sports car or trading the wife for a younger model.
Gruffalox wrote: » It probably won't although I can see the point of sending in reinforcements to areas being burned by bored and neurotic frat kids high on the stink of idiotic identity politics. Biden winning would be like rewarding screaming toddlers. But there is a big part of me hopes he wins so the Dems have to deal with the idiocy they have fostered whereby college dorms are going back to racial segregation, people can be mobbed in public if they do not kneel or raise a fist, and big strapping boys will be beating the girls in athletics and taking their scholarships.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » i was responding to one of your fellow travelers who described him as traditionally masculine. do you think he is traditionally masculine? is it traditionally masculine to wear more makeup than a drag queen?
Injuryprone wrote: » Care to explain how re-electing DT is going to improve things.
namloc1980 wrote: » Easily impressed aren't we. Basically Trump's & the RNC message was: things are really terrible in many parts of the country and I couldn't do anything to solve those problems in the last 4 years but give me 4 more years anyway because none of the problems are my fault.
ELM327 wrote: » So you can insult trumps physical appearance, but anyone daring to criticize Michelle Obama in the same way or use Joe's nickname gets banned? #leftism
Carfacemandog wrote: » The protests and riots are not only the largest in American history, they have the support of the public across almost every demographic. Just because his base hate the idea of protesting on an issue like this, whether it be peaceful or otherwise (and the reactions to Colin Kaepernick in the NFL and now the NBA boycotts shows up the lie that they would be ok with peaceful protest), it doesn't do anything to change that. If Trump thinks his efforts to emulate China's response to the Hong Kong protests, he is in for a rude awakening. It appears those around him have long since copped on to this too, hence their efforts to dismantle the postal services ability to sort and deliver mail in ballots instead.
ELM327 wrote: » I think the confusion is the US is a net exporter of petroleum products (eg Gasoline/petrol) but a net importer by 2m barrels of raw crudehttps://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=42735
ohnonotgmail wrote: » PS or not he is still a fat tub of lard who struggles to walk down a ramp and who wears more makeup than a drag queen. how is that traditional masculinity?
Biker79 wrote: » They despise her because she represents traditional femininity.They despise Trump because he represents traditional masculinity. They have already made it clear they regard gender as a social construct. They feel it is whatever people choose it to be, rather than a biological reality ( unless of course you're a beautiful woman or a dominant male ..they don't get the same parity of esteem ). If we were to see into the future from a vantage point of 2005, nobody would believe the nonsense lefties have come up with. But here we are.
namloc1980 wrote: » So Trump told so many lies last night but the crazy thing is he just tells provable lies based on simple fact checking. He claimed the USA was energy independent and not reliant on foreign energy sources. In reality the US imports vast amounts of crude oil from overseas at an average of 188 million barrels of oil per month in 2020 so far. While it is correct that domestic production has increased significantly and US oil exports have increased, this started under Obama and Trump has continued that increase in domestic production. So while there is less reliance on foreign oil the US remains a net oil importer.https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrimus1&f=m He also claimed (again) credit for the Veterans Choice Act. This was actually enacted by Obama in 2014. Here's a picture of Obama signing it into law in 2014 form the White House archive with the caption:President Barack Obama signs H.R. 3230, the Veterans' Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, at Fort Belvoir, Va., Aug. 7, 2014. The bill provides the Department of Veterans Affairs the resources to improve access and quality of care for veterans. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
ELM327 wrote: » Your photo is photoshopped. Compare the dimensions to the dimensions in the below real photo from the independent.
Tigerbaby wrote: » The more that I see the BLM (Burn, Loot and Murder) protests going on, the greater chance exists that President Trump will be re-elected. Don't the Democrats not realise that BLM is the greatest weapon in Trump's armoury right now? Or simply is it now a monster they can no longer control?Cogent thoughts and debate please.
Biker79 wrote: » They despise her because she represents traditional femininity. They despise Trump because he represents traditional masculinity. They have already made it clear they regard gender as a social construct. They feel it is whatever people choose it to be, rather than a biological reality ( unless of course you're a beautiful woman or a dominant male ..they don't get the same parity of esteem ). If we were to see into the future from a vantage point of 2005, nobody would believe the nonsense lefties have come up with. But here we are.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » if by traditional femininity you mean she is expected to put up with her husband barebacking a porn star a few weeks after giving birth then you are probably right. and trump sure is the definition of traditional masculinity. he uses more makeup than Ru Paul.
Tigerbaby wrote: » The more that I see the BLM (Burn, Loot and Murder) protests going on, the greater chance exists that President Trump will be re-elected. Don't the Democrats not realise that BLM is the greatest weapon in Trump's armoury right now? Or simply is it now a monster they can no longer control? Cogent thoughts and debate please.
Gerry Hatrick wrote: » The left despise her because she is beautiful and intelligent.
Gruffalox wrote: » Oh I see. That is the level I am dealing with. For what it is worth Melania is gorgeous, and seems sweet. She generally looks fantastic. She has come in for constant marauding by the left leaning side of things for everything from her clothes, past nudes (priestly horror again), her Christmas decorations to her Rose Garden renovations. As someone who would never vote for someone like Trump - or Biden either, shudders!!- I have thought Melania has great taste and an aesthetic eye and did a grand old job on the previously kitschy rose garden. The persistent deranged mauling of her has been revealing.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » a link to them was posted yesterday. all fine enough if you like women with bolted on plastic breasts.
Gruffalox wrote: » The people on the streets rioting in America at the moment are violent anti-intellectual low lifes. They have no class. They are hysterical and criminal fools. Defacing public property. Invading shops. Forcing people via mob rule to raise their fists to support "BLM". Pillaging and looting under the guise of a "rights" movement.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
