John O.Groats wrote: » As someone who has stated that he doesn`t care about the vulnerable why are you now suddenly crying crocodile tears about the foetuses that wee aborted? And ironic that you should mention shifting the goalposts when that is exactly what you are doing.
GT89 wrote: » Tbh if there is a vaccine within the next year or so I will be highly suspect. Vaccines take a long time to develop. It will make me think that this came from a lab and released as a targeted bio weapon and the vaccine is to be realeased as part of a problem reaction solution. Problem= Covid 1984 Reaction= lockdowns, masks, social distancing, fear, tensions and unrest Solution= Mass vacination, cashless society and surveillance
GT89 wrote: » Also people keep saying it's not just the flu but it seems they downplay the severity of the flu. The flu is not just the sniffles the flu kills people especially the elderly and vulnerable but how come I wasn't a selfish prick last winter for not wearing a mask or why wasn't there a lockdown for flu season.
GT89 wrote: » Do you not care about the babies that were mudered?
GT89 wrote: » I know not one who got covid 1984 but that was worthy of universal mask wearing and lockdowns.
i_surge wrote: » Did it ever cross your mind that the first and second parts of your sentence might have a link? That 1984 stuff is pure paranoia. I am against all forms of government interference in private lives too but this is not it.
GT89 wrote: » Anyone who listens to Professor Delores Cahill a woman who is an expert in the fields of mediciene and immunology is considered conspiracy theorist it seems there is an agenda at play when expsrts aren't listened to and the only experts being heard on the msm are saying the same thing.
saneman wrote: » Jaysus, i don't know what youtube rabbit hole you've found yourself in but I can only guess from phrases like "targeted bioweapon" & "Covid 1984" that it's a deep one. We'll drop you down a lifeline if you need it, just shout. We know we'll hear you cos of course you won't be wearing a mask...
GT89 wrote: » Answer me this question? If covid is transmitted through coughing, sneezing and even speaking why are places pushing cashless payments? Please think about it
i_surge wrote: » Ah sure it is great fun, we can all just decide on our favourite experts and our favourite facts.
3wayswitch wrote: » 1). There are vaccines available for the flu. This gives people the ability to protect themselves and not require you to protect them. 2). As of December 2019 there were 22 flu related deaths in Ireland reported for the 2019/2020 flu season. Covid 19 has killed 1,777 people so far this year.
GT89 wrote: » I listen to people who I feel make sense and Delores Cahill is one of those for me
i_surge wrote: » Yeah yeah exactly and I chose the ones that make sense to me and then we can both coexist in this happy magical world where we are both completely right. Reality is just a perception of the mind and we can chose our own. Fantastic.
washman3 wrote: » 680 people less have died in Ireland so far in 2020 than died in the same period in 2019. Any explanation for this.?
GT89 wrote: » Exactly now we should be allowed choose whether to wear a mask or not
i_surge wrote: » Hmmmm What do you think yourself?
washman3 wrote: » Is 'professor' Luke O'Neill your favourite expert by any chance....???
John O.Groats wrote: » I would answer that it`s to reduce the risk of transmitting the virus by not handling potentially infected notes and coins but no doubt Mulder and Scully and yourself have diferent reasons.
patnor1011 wrote: » Isnt it exactly what we all do? Like always?
i_surge wrote: » I'm my own expert, do the research from all angles, read the studies, get the consensus, fact check, repeat and then work from basic principles. I keep an eye out for new information and love to find where I am wrong so I can update those principles.
patnor1011 wrote: » Updating principles is very tricky and hard. Sometimes you shuld stick to them or trust your gut. Law of selfpreservation says you should question those who claim that they have only your best interests at their heart.
3wayswitch wrote: » I think you might have misinterpreted that figure wrong. I believe what you might be referring to is that the number of excess deaths for the year so far is less than the reported COVID-19-related deaths over the same period. 1,709 people had died from Covid 19 by July, but there were only about 1,100 to 1,200 more deaths than we would have expected based on historical patterns. I presume the cause of this discrepancy is from elderly / terminally sick people who died from Covid 19, but still would have passed away from other causes had they not caught it.
