nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Aaron Brady Guilty as charged

knucklehead6

Aaron Brady has been found guilty of the capital murder of Det Garda Adrian Donohoe in Louth in 2013.

On Monday, Brady, of New Road, Crossmaglen, Co Armagh, was found guilty of robbing approximately €7,000 in cash and cheques outside the Lordship Credit Union in January 2013.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Brock Turnpike

Any good summary of the trial/case available? Have only seen dribs and drabs on the news.

brendanwalsh

ChikiChiki wrote: »

It would put a serious taint on probably the most successful club in the history of the GAA if true...

Crossmaglen shown up to be scumbags too

mynamejeff

begbysback wrote: »

Is stating something while drunk in a pub drunk considered sufficient evidence for capital murder, or was there any actual evidence?

why don't you google it ,

the garda the psni and the nypd as well as the dpp and the high court decided there was enough to bring this horrible little toad back from the states

then a jury found him guilty

he did it get over it

and the rest of the cnuts with him should be done for it too

mynamejeff

brendanwalsh wrote: »

Crossmaglen shown up to be scumbags too

plenty of provo criminals involved in that club always have been

all good republicans

An Ri rua

begbysback wrote: »

Wasn’t really following the details of the case, had the actually got any evidence on this guy?

No, they just banged him up because of his rodent's head.
Which is equally fair surely.

SeaFields

RTE radio 1 will be carrying this shortly which will include a report on the trial and evidence. For those saying they hadn't heard much.

bmcc10

mynamejeff wrote: »

why don't you google it ,

the garda the psni and the nypd as well as the dpp and the high court decided there was enough to bring this horrible little toad back from the states

then a jury found him guilty

he did it get over it

and the rest of the cnuts with him should be done for it too

He was deported from the states for traffic related offences.

begbysback

Tacitus Kilgore wrote: »

So you didn't follow the case and have no details but are doubting the validity of evidence that you haven't even read up on?

Yes, that’s usually how this works, gather information and question it as you go along, you got a problem with that?

[Deleted User]

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

Special criminal court puts another scumbag away.

Thank god its not been abolished like a certain party is calling for.

Haha this FAKE NEWS got three likes.

He was found guilty by a jury of his peers in the Central Criminal Court.

PGE1970

I am normally a mild and fair minded person.

But I hope this p o s rots in jail for the rest of his life.

Tacitus Kilgore

begbysback wrote: »

Yes, that’s usually how this works, gather information and question it as you go along, you got a problem with that?

Correct, and as per your own definition here - usually one would look at some information prior to questioning it - you are questioning the validity of evidence before you even know what it is

I don't got a problem with that but you are literally going against your own logic. :pac:

FrancieBrady

Followed bits of this case and it looks like a very safe and welcome conviction. Some small justice for his senseless killing.
Well done to the Gardai work that secured this conviction.

ThewhiteJesus

White lighting wrote: »

Well he went over to Woodlawn in New York hiding after it and told everyone over there he did it when he used to get drunk. Sounded like a scumbag his father went over to celebrate his birthday one year and pulled a gun on a fella in a pub so scumbag family.
Wonder will Tony McEntee write him another Character reference

Hardly makes him guilty talking crap in a pub, like i said earlier, if he's really guilty then well done.
I'm not so sure.

ThewhiteJesus

Tacitus Kilgore wrote: »

So you didn't follow the case and have no details but are doubting the validity of evidence that you haven't even read up on?

why not challenge him then, or can you just quote people ?
What cast iron evidence is there please enlighten us ?

Hodors Appletart

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Hardly makes him guilty talking crap in a pub, like i said earlier, if he's really guilty then well done.
I'm not so sure.

this is pretty sickening tbh

you are aware there is evidence other than hearsay but still choose to try to undermine the justice system

one would wonder why and what the agenda here is

begbysback

Tacitus Kilgore wrote: »

Correct, and as per your own definition here - usually one would look at some information prior to questioning it - you are questioning the validity of evidence before you even know what it is

I don't got a problem with that but you are literally going against your own logic. :pac:

I take it your from the country so I’ll help you out with some context, I was conversing with another poster who gave me one piece of information which I questioned. I usually try my best to avoid people like you who arrive on a thread with a conclusion, good luck.

padd b1975

Once less piece of "republican" scum to worry about.

ThewhiteJesus

Hodors Appletart wrote: »

this is pretty sickening tbh

you are aware there is evidence other than hearsay but still choose to try to undermine the justice system

one would wonder why and what the agenda here is

Why is it sickening i'm asking a valid question.
What is the evidence so seen as you seem to know it all ?

begbysback

Hodors Appletart wrote: »

this is pretty sickening tbh

you are aware there is evidence other than hearsay but still choose to try to undermine the justice system

one would wonder why and what the agenda here is

So why not then add the other evidence here on the forum, it can then be discussed, instead of taking it personally, that’s usually how this works.

ChikiChiki

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Hardly makes him guilty talking crap in a pub, like i said earlier, if he's really guilty then well done.
I'm not so sure.

He's guilty. The evidence is there. Get over it.

Hope the rotten piece of **** lives a miserable existence for the rest of his day's.

Hodors Appletart

padd b1975 wrote: »

Once less piece of "republican" scum to worry about.

and there it is

this is the reason there are rabid dogs in this thread doing their utmost to undermine and question the Gardaí, the judge and jury, the US Authorities and the same type of person who was off camera with that lady in the States on video.

Good republicans one and all.

ThewhiteJesus

begbysback wrote: »

I take it your from the country so I’ll help you out with some context, I was conversing with another poster who gave me one piece of information which I questioned. I usually try my best to avoid people like you who arrive on a thread with a conclusion, good luck.

he's the type that go's from thread to thread quoting people without actually making any valid points.
Sad really

ThewhiteJesus

ChikiChiki wrote: »

He's guilty. The evidence is there. Get over it.

Hope the rotten piece of **** lives a miserable existence for the rest of his day's.

Another person that won't actually say what evidence there is.
You are easily convinced.

event

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Hardly makes him guilty talking crap in a pub, like i said earlier, if he's really guilty then well done.
I'm not so sure.

Tbf, it doesn't matter a joy what you think. A jury of his peers found him guilty. End of story. This is not some miscarriage of justice.

Absolutely delighted, brilliant news for the family and colleagues.

Pythagorean

Delighted that sewer rat got his comeuppance. The only regret I have is that the Det. Garda didn't shoot first, and save the taxpayer the expense of the trial, and the cost of keeping this vermin in jail for years to come. I hope they get the rest of the dirtbags too.

ThewhiteJesus

event wrote: »

Tbf, it doesn't matter a joy what you think. A jury of his peers found him guilty. End of story. This is not some miscarriage of justice.

Absolutely delighted, brilliant news for the family and colleagues.

End of story, in other words you don't have a clue either, like the two people spouting the same nonsense in this thread.

ArmaniJeanss

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Another person that won't actually say what evidence there is.
You are easily convinced.

The judge's summing up of the evidence for the jury took half a day.
Posters here seem to want someone to sum it up in a few bullet points, whilst also be detailed enough to stand up their scrutiny.

ThewhiteJesus

Pythagorean wrote: »

Delighted that sewer rat got his comeuppance. The only regret I have is that the Det. Garda didn't shoot first, and save the taxpayer the expense of the trial, and the cost of keeping this vermin in jail for years to come. I hope they get the rest of the dirtbags too.

I'm not sure the conviction will stick that's my point, if only someone could tell us what the actual hard evidence was instead of saying end of story !

CrankyHaus

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

End of story, in other words you don't have a clue either, like the two people spouting the same nonsense in this thread.

Well since a jury was satisfied of his guilt, why do you think there was insufficient evidence?

Genuine question. I'm not coming at the case with an expert's knowledge and if you have substantive criticisms of the prosecution I'd be interested in them.

suicide_circus

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

I'm not sure the conviction will stick that's my point, if only someone could tell us what the actual hard evidence was instead of saying end of story !

Do you treat all court verdicts like this?