seamus wrote: » The mistake you're making is thinking that this has anything to do with what he was buying or where he was buying it. It was a pathetic attempt at a potshot. If he went to Cripp's he'd be accused of pandering to Leafy South Dublin FG voters. If he went out to a shop in Blanchardstown village he'd be accused of playing local politics. There was no substance to this tweet. It was bitching for the sake of bitching. SF special.
jh79 wrote: » Buying a pair of shoes and going for dinner with his partner shows a lack of empathy? Jaysus.
jm08 wrote: » he shouldn't be doing stupid photoshoots like this that are divisive.
seamus wrote: » See you're out and out a SF supporter. Whereas you won't find any indication here that I'm a FG supporter. I'll support any valid criticism of any politician. A man choosing to spend his own money on a mid-range pair of shoes, is not valid criticism. This is not about Varadkar. This is about Cullinane and how he's an ignoramus that's completely unsuitable for public office. The childishness of a 46 year old man shouting "up the RA" was just the beginning, but he's maintained this nonsense throughout. And the support he maintains within SF displays the wider contagion. O'Broin and Doherty are just as prolific with the invented outrage, but they're a little more savvy than Cullinane and aren't quite as easiy caught out.
FrancieBrady wrote: » After all, 'We are all in this together loike'.
seamus wrote: » The photoshoot was certainly pointless and perhaps frivilous. But divisive? The only person who made any noise about it, quickly slunk off into the darkness after realising how ridiculous they were being.
smurgen wrote: » People droning on about SF online supporter yet dehumanising language like this gets totally ignored.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Did you just ignore what I claimed was the most serious instance of his coldness and lack of empathy? Jaysus, that takes the biscuit. If you are cold and lack empathy it will reveal itself in various levels. Varadkar has now done it, revealed his lack, at various levels.
Deleted User wrote: » Shop local. Support the local economy. Would you have our taoisigh go around looking like Wallace, Murphy or Boy Barrett?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Totally agree Maryanne....in all of these shoots he is promoting an image.
jh79 wrote: » But throwing in buying shoes and having a dinner with your partner is ridiculous.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Not when you are attempting to criticise a pattern of behaviour that shows somebody as being cold, and lacking in empathy. I don't like making claims without backing it up with evidence and I am not the only one who has observed this in Varadkar. Right across journalism and politics he has been called on this.
jh79 wrote: » So how does these two examples show lack of empathy? Encouraging people to spend in the local economy helps with the COVID recover from a financial perspective.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So, somebody says that there is a 'pattern of behaviour here' and you are going to insist on picking out the behaviour that are least serious and DEMAND explanations? There are and were many other ways to support local business. As part of the image conscious obsession of the man it was worthy of note...the shoe PR shoot. The huffy over reaction to somebody in particular commenting on it (a Shinner surprise surprise) and nobody else who commented on it, is funny at this stage.
jm08 wrote: » The timing was poor from the point of view of the lockdown in the country (Kildare, Laois and Offaly), while city slicker Government Minister goes shopping on one of Ireland most expensive streets in the capital to buy a pair of shoes. A touch of the Marie Antoinette's about it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I don't think the tweet was about money, it was about Leo's coldness, lack of empathy and insensitivity,
jm08 wrote: » Its owned by the Canadian Weston family. Mrs Weston is Irish and they are Ireland's richest family (they own BTs as well).
jh79 wrote: » A bit rich for a Shinner claiming someone lacks empathy to be fair. Members of FG have done lots of bad things but none have ever murdered people or turned a blind eye to murder.
joeguevara wrote: » Shaws.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Are they still ‘almost nationwide’?
FrancieBrady wrote: » What? FF and FG spent most of the last 100 yrs turning a blind eye to what was going on in NI when Irish people were getting beaten of the streets and shot. (call it killing or murder, whatever) Still do unless there is political gain for them in something that has gone on.
jh79 wrote: » What should they have done, declared war on the UK? Did SF members show empathy to the family of Robert McCartney?
joeguevara wrote: » Is there really nothing better to discuss than a tweet about a pair of 'fashion shoes'. He tweeted it, regretted it and deleted it. Same as members of all parties have done. Anything I have missed?
markodaly wrote: » Has any FG TD tweeted about another TD's fashion choice? The equivalence would be someone like Eoghan Murphy tweeting about some blouse MLMD wore or bought. Yet, this never happened, but sure.. 'everyone' does it ... right? The usual SF excuse when they are caught with the fingers in the cookie jar?
JohnnyFlash wrote: » What image?