Field east wrote: » Is Cullinane /SF adapting a bit of the Trump strategy. Ie Put a load of statements out there , see what gets traction/ takes off in all directions, what exercises the media/ public etc ,etc and KEEP IT GOING until it has done as much damage as is possible/ until the media move onto something else
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » You're right about their newfound fleeting voter base voting for protest. However, were a GE to be called these days, it would be jobs and the economy that those voters will be primarily concerned about. No use complaining about a housing shortage if you have no job to pay for a mortgage.
markodaly wrote: » Oh no, NOT the HUFFY MOB!! Poor David, will he ever recover! Drawing attention to the Dail dress code is a universe away for calling Leo a physopath for buying a pair of shoes. I would not be surprised if David himself thinks like Paddy Holohan in regards Leo. But to you Francie, everything is an apple isn't. Buying a pair of shoes is an apple just like ordering the murder of a woman is also an apple.
jm08 wrote: » Actually, I think it was just a stupid idea in the first place to have Leo buying shoes anywhere. Leo is meant to be government minister for the whole country and he shouldn't be doing stupid photoshoots like this that are divisive.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No...because the huffy mob was only interested in the fact that a 'shinner' said it.
You just did it, not realising that Michelle Mulherin and Alan Shatter drew attention to the 'fashion choices' of others.
Deleted User wrote: » An image of a hard working politician taking time out of his busy schedule to promote and support local businesses. Neatly dressed. Shoes polished. Well groomed. A credit to his country.
markodaly wrote: » Did they all delete their tweet as well? :pac::pac:
FrancieBrady wrote: » Loads of people commented on the PR stunt yesterday on Twitter...not just Cullinane. Nice spinning there Seamus.
Niallof9 wrote: » Yep cause thats what he was doing there, he was off shopping rather than acting in his role as Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment. ffs i'm so sick and tired of this ****e at this stage. and yeah Francie John Brady was going on about it as well. Kittie Holland and on and on. Its populist bull****. I imagine the shop was chosen due to its central location and the government have a pr and taoiseachs/tainaste department who run it. People seriously think Leo is the one who is the man who directs all this stuff? people haven't got a clue how government and these things are done. i will agree there is an argument they should be a little smarter about it. and i'm sure somebody would mention going to a cheaper shop but you can be gauranteed the same ****e would be spun. but calling him out for anything is absolute bull****. who said he even bought any ****ing shoes? Proof of Leo's lack of empathy. Yeah right. For all we know he could be an autistic, awkward, anti social person. I'm no real fan of his but the criticism he gets is stupid just as it was with Enda, who was universally respected and liked in Europe.
jh79 wrote: » SF store has an 80 euro silver easter lily and an awful print of some Lynch fella for 115 euro!
piplip87 wrote: » http://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2020/08/11/news/arlene-foster-and-michelle-o-neill-respect-hong-kong-national-security-laws-2031376/?param=ds441rif44T I wonder what the aul shinner playbook will say about this.... Although not surprising as they sided with the Chinese on saying the election in Venezuela was free and fair.....
markodaly wrote: » Has any FG TD tweeted about another TD's fashion choice? The equivalence would be someone like Eoghan Murphy tweeting about some blouse MLMD wore or bought. Yet, this never happened, but sure.. 'everyone' does it ... right? The usual SF excuse when they are caught with the fingers in the cookie jar?
smurgen wrote: » Did Vardkar show sympathy to Ruth Morrissey's husband? No he had his spokes person refute the details of the widow's public statement on the day of her death.https://twitter.com/PhelanVicky/status/1286648467956224001?s=19
Yeah_Right wrote: » Why? If he can afford a good pair of shoes from an expensive shop, why shouldn't he buy them? Should people only support shops that sell cheap stuff like Pennys?
jh79 wrote: » What should they have done, declared war on the UK? Did SF members show empathy to the family of Robert McCartney?
JohnnyFlash wrote: » What image?
joeguevara wrote: » Is there really nothing better to discuss than a tweet about a pair of 'fashion shoes'. He tweeted it, regretted it and deleted it. Same as members of all parties have done. Anything I have missed?
FrancieBrady wrote: » What? FF and FG spent most of the last 100 yrs turning a blind eye to what was going on in NI when Irish people were getting beaten of the streets and shot. (call it killing or murder, whatever) Still do unless there is political gain for them in something that has gone on.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Are they still ‘almost nationwide’?
joeguevara wrote: » Shaws.
jh79 wrote: » A bit rich for a Shinner claiming someone lacks empathy to be fair. Members of FG have done lots of bad things but none have ever murdered people or turned a blind eye to murder.
jm08 wrote: » Its owned by the Canadian Weston family. Mrs Weston is Irish and they are Ireland's richest family (they own BTs as well).
FrancieBrady wrote: » I don't think the tweet was about money, it was about Leo's coldness, lack of empathy and insensitivity,
jm08 wrote: » The timing was poor from the point of view of the lockdown in the country (Kildare, Laois and Offaly), while city slicker Government Minister goes shopping on one of Ireland most expensive streets in the capital to buy a pair of shoes. A touch of the Marie Antoinette's about it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So, somebody says that there is a 'pattern of behaviour here' and you are going to insist on picking out the behaviour that are least serious and DEMAND explanations? There are and were many other ways to support local business. As part of the image conscious obsession of the man it was worthy of note...the shoe PR shoot. The huffy over reaction to somebody in particular commenting on it (a Shinner surprise surprise) and nobody else who commented on it, is funny at this stage.
seamus wrote: » The photoshoot was certainly pointless and perhaps frivilous. But divisive? The only person who made any noise about it, quickly slunk off into the darkness after realising how ridiculous they were being.