ginoginelli wrote: » In lidl today, happy to report 100 % customer compliance. Couldn't say the same for the staff unfortunately, the check out girls were behind screens at least, but one employee was sauntering about the aisles with no protection. Hopefully all will be masked up monday.
Seanachai wrote: » Maybe she has an exemption?
is_that_so wrote: » We did get somewhat lucky, perhaps in our timing of decisions, but what we did we did pretty well. I'd call that a success.
Graham wrote: » I understand it's going to be a new Statutory Instrument under the Irish Health Act.
ginoginelli wrote: » Sage have come out and said what most of us suspected here - visors are basically useless. I hope ireland re examine our policy on visors now. Most people in retail, and an increasing number of regular folk have been opting for them on the false pretense that they offer protection. Let's hope we can be a bit faster in keeping up with the science this time.
Polar101 wrote: » I had the opposite experience in my local Lidl yesterday, staff were all wearing masks, but I'd say only about 25% of the customers were.
McGiver wrote: » Is it like an executive order? So it will be a legal instrument of lower order not a bill per se but still legally valid, if I understand correctly.
[Deleted User] wrote: » https://twitter.com/inthenow/status/1291540276498948097
xhomelezz wrote: » It looks like half of the people here are saving masks for Monday
xhomelezz wrote: » Just back from shop, local Centra barely 50% masked up, out of 6 Centra employees 2 masks on..time to follow the guy in the video and get the flamethrower It looks like half of the people here are saving masks for Monday
Adrien Uneven Archery wrote: » Except there ain't no law requiring you to wear a mask from Monday!https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/1f150-view-statutory-instruments-related-to-the-covid-19-pandemic/ There is however new legislation covering the three counties on lockdown.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » Why are they not making masks mandatory in other indoor places?
xhomelezz wrote: » Just give them time, look how long did it take to reach the point where we are now and still no enforcement, so any freedom warrior will do whatever he wants. Local lockdown done and we'll see how that will go..
Away With The Fairies wrote: » Ah yeah, give the virus time, what can go wrong?
Away With The Fairies wrote: » What would people do if you took a job where you were told that masks are worn and then turns out they aren't being worn?
Graham wrote: » Report to the HSA.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » What would people do if you took a job where you were told that masks are worn and then turns out they aren't being worn? I can't walk out from a job either because I'm not entitled to receive social welfare. But I don't feel safe either. Is there anything I can do?
Spiderman0081 wrote: » Yes. Take a chill pill
McGiver wrote: » Who introduced them? It's so obvious they're are only marginally effective - there's a f*cking bloody hole in them
ressem wrote: » They're way, way cheaper to manufacture and re-use than masks so naturally businesses will substitute them, unless customers /staff / insurers say not good enough.
mirrorwall14 wrote: » Can I ask for anyone wearing masks for long periods in work what ones have you found most comfortable?
Don2012 wrote: » Please watch this, and give viewpoint afterward thank you.https://youtu.be/U47_sRuG0Yg