Overheal wrote: » I missed a lot of this hearing at the doctors office today but from what I’m seeing now there’s bipartisan grilling of these tech firms they just have very different agenda: Democrats are grilling for instance, Facebook on giving legitimacy to debunked Covid nonsense from Trump et al. And simultaneously Republicans are bludgeoning these groups for censoring debunked Covid nonsense from Trump et al :rolleyes: “persecution complex” as one Democrat just put it. The Republican side of the room is primarily outraged at google for conspiracy theories that they are orchestrating their search engine to help Biden win. Democrats are focusing ire at Apple for removing apps that compete with services that Apple then bakes into iOS, like ScreenTime. It’s hard to see what useful takeaways will come from this at the end of the hearing.
mcmoustache wrote: » This will be interesting. Not the tweet itself, it's standard fare from Trump, but the justifications from his fans who will doubtlessly feel compelled to explain why elections should be delayed.
mcmoustache wrote: » This will be interesting. Not the tweet itself, it's standard fare from Trump, but the justifications from his fans who will doubtlessly feel compelled to explain why elections should be delayed.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1288818160389558273
Wanderer78 wrote: » lets pretend the shoe is on the other foot, that the donald is polling very well, would he still be requesting this?
The US economy shrank by a 32.9% annual rate in the April-to-June quarter as the country grappled with cut backs in spending during the pandemic. It was the deepest decline since the government began keeping records in 1947 and three times more severe than the prior record of 10% set in 1958. Reduced spending on services such as healthcare drove the fall. Economists have said they expected to see the sharpest drop in the second quarter, with recovery thereafter. But as virus cases in the US surge and some areas re-impose restrictions on activity, the rebound is showing signs of stalling.
Overheal wrote: » Yep the power to alter the time and place of elections is the remit of Congress. We've had elections throughout the Civil War, even. The actual odds of postponing the election are statistically null.
hotmail.com wrote: » Oh but I'm sure we'll get dictator accusations and all the usual hoopla to his nonsense.
Wanderer78 wrote: » to be fair, theres not much rattling around upstairs, for him to make it to that position
hotmail.com wrote: » I know that, tell that to the weird outraged Trump mob who still think he's trying to be a dictator.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Some of you may have seen this tweet of Herman Cain at the Tulsa rally. He died today of Covidhttps://twitter.com/THEHermanCain/status/1274489632886075398
Overheal wrote: » To be fair, that he can't legally do the things he wants to do doesn't extinguish the fact that he wants to do them, which includes delaying an election because, ultimately, he thinks he will not like the outcome.
hotmail.com wrote: » This isn't a Trump issue. Governments and leaders around the world try to act outside of their boundaries when they want to. The system of courts and lower and upper houses prevents this from happening.
Overheal wrote: » It is a Trump issue, as it's Trump who is advocating for a delay of election.
mcmoustache wrote: » He should really stop saying dictatorial stuff though. I know he's a clown but he's also the President of the US. Publicly suggesting (and not joking either) that elections should be suspended is dictatorial no matter how you look at it. His inability to do it doesn't change his intent.
hotmail.com wrote: » But he can't is the point. Story over. Just because an election is delayed doesn't make him a dictator anyway.
People can't wait to adjudge this as dictatorial.
mcmoustache wrote: » Delaying elections until they can be secured is a bit open ended though. It leaves a lot of scope to not have elections at all. Not unlike those temporary states of emergency that go on forever in shíthole countries.
Overheal wrote: » Okay. ? Nobody in here today was calling Trump a dictator except you, implying it as a straw man, so I'm not sure what else your point was put to come in here and defeat a story you've propped up by yourself. The only other mention of dictators is direct prompt from your strawman. Again: who? You're the first to mention dictators today.
hotmail.com wrote: » Does it matter anyway? Almost half of Americans don't even vote. They can't see a difference between the two parties.
hotmail.com wrote: » The post above.
Overheal wrote: » Which again, is just a response in kind to your straw man. And calls the gesture 'dictatorial,' doesn't argue he is a dictator.
Overheal wrote: » Who do you think you are speaking for, suddenly, and why?
hotmail.com wrote: » You know that we hear people calling Trump a dictator, time and time again.