Sergio Ramos wrote: » I didn't say it was the right balance, the right balance is hard to quantify, it's a good balance. Personally I would have had the teachers wearing face visors and kids wearing masks over a certain age where it's practical. The world needs to keep turning, the risks of not sending kids to school gets greater and greater as time goes on.
Sierra Oscar wrote: » It's positive to see a full re-opening of schools in as 'normal' a manner as possible. Reading over the plan, it thankfully seems that some of the major disruption that was predicted will be avoided. Fair play to the teachers for getting on board with this plan, it can't be implemented without them. That deserves recognition.
vid36 wrote: » As Dr Fauci says
glack wrote: » The diagrams are hilarious. The primary school ones are based on classrooms that are 60 or 80 metres squared. My classroom is 42 meters squared. I particularly love the suggestion to have children sitting between 2 desks. As in, 2 tables are placed side by side, one child at each end and one in the middle sat at the table legs. Comfy!
Peter Flynt wrote: » As a teacher of 20 years experience I am utterly appalled at the plan to return to schools to the point that I will give thought to quitting, and my school won't find an adequate replacement.
combat14 wrote: » if it is safe to go back let's cancel the facemasks in shops and on buses too let's have all the pubs really open first and let's see all the TDs back in the dail too then we can see about schools with no proper health and safety rules ....
khalessi wrote: » It is an eyesore of a dcoument alright between the mockery of social distancing, the incomplete list of symptoms, the lack of ppe for staff, 30 kids in a class with 40cm. It is embarrassing to think the Min of Ed is a teacher and doesnt even comtemplate how cold viruses (another version of coronavirus, one of the 7 types) travel around a room let alone vomitting bugs. I feel very let down but not surprised at the same time.
sideswipe wrote: » Can I ask what in particular is so bad about the plan? Or rather what you feel should happen? Not **** stirring here btw, genuinely interested to hear the views of those on the front line of this. Personally I can’t see an alternative to what is being suggested apart from keep schools closed until a vaccine is available.
Icyseanfitz wrote: » Let staff use PPE, cut class numbers in half, so bring half the school in one week, the other half in the week after, make use of remote learning to cut down on contact hours, hand sanitizer stations in all classes, figure out how to safely do practical subjects, temperature checking in the morning at some point. There's lots they could have tried but they went with the easier option imo
Sierra Oscar wrote: » I think what you suggest regarding a half and half split would be ideal in terms of creating the right environment for social distancing. However the hard reality is that it wouldn't be tolerated by working parents. It's a calculated political decision.
Grandeeod wrote: » I'm only a concerned parent and already feel sick at the thoughts of it. A complete cop out and pass the buck to local schools scenario. I wouldn't even trust boards of management at this point as they can be influenced. Once again I'll say what was wrong with alternate weeks to reduce school capacity and keep the show on the road under review.
Risteard81 wrote: » Fauci is a fraud.
gnf_ireland wrote: » To be fair, I dont think half and half would be supported by any teacher who is also a parent either !! Just to be clear, these proposals do not allow any working parents to go back into an office full time. It is likely children will be out pretty frequently given the guidelines provided today. This is a calculated political decision - absolutely. Everything that the new government has said since coming to office clearly stated they wanted schools to open full time in September. They have demonised foreign holidays and sacrificed opening of pubs with this sole objective in mind. And of course, not forgetting the fact that Micheal is also a teacher The sad reality of this thread is it is now over 4 months old and we are no further along with having the schools reopened than we were after the Easter holidays. Yes, there is potentially some money being thrown at the problem, but there is no meaningful plan as to how schools will open and this is disappointing beyond belief. I am not sure which will be worse - the fiasco that was the 3rd term last year or the fiasco that will be the 1st term coming !
sideswipe wrote: » Think you may be jumping the gun as far as ‘teachers getting on board’ is concerned if the comments of teachers here is anything to go by.
Benimar wrote: » Couldn’t agree more. We have spent 4 months keeping our 2 kids safe, and are now faced with the decision of sending them back into an unsafe environment. I’d gladly work around having them in half time in order to ensure they were in a safer environment.
Sierra Oscar wrote: » The reaction from union officials has been cautious but generally positive. The next couple of days will tell I guess. Realistically though, what is the alternative for teachers? This is the only plan we have.
Smacruairi wrote: » I remember a back and forth with you 3 months ago, and we agreed we would plan as best as we could. Has your opinion changed slightly that the govt, more specifically the DES is absolutely brutal?