Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: It's happening whether you like it or not, at least there's a bit of clarity now.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: 1,080 extra teachers will be added to post-primary schools at a cost of €53 million to help reduce class sizes.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: Lunch breaks and school start times are set to be staggered, while the wearing of face coverings will not be compulsory in classes.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: Face coverings will be compulsory for all post-primary students when travelling on or waiting for public transport, with the exception of those with medical or special educational needs.
combat14 wrote: » this plan plain and simple is just not safe ....
CruelSummer wrote: » It wasn’t me that did the comparing, it was a poster in favour of masks for young children that referred to supermarkets and shops. What supermarkets do you see 2 metre social distancing? Because I see zero social distancing in supermarkets I’m in and no reflection on daily case numbers.
s1ippy wrote: » It's not about your specific four year old, it's about children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds who would be spitting at teachers anyway and will be even more enthusiastic about doing it now.
dhaughton99 wrote: » I don’t know about everyone else but I’m working in 2 schools and the caretakers and cleaners just couldn’t be bothered to work. You can get them to do nothing. Can’t think what they are going to be like come September.
Boggles wrote: » The virus doesn't give a bollíx what anyone needs, this X needs this and Y needs that. Yes, everybody knows children need an education, it's not like some one will read your post and go "really, children need an education?" In a once in a generation pandemic it's about balancing that need with the safety of everyone in society. The "plan" does not come anywhere near addressing that. Aspirational nonsense draped in unworkable rhetoric.
lawred2 wrote: » What's your plan?
is_that_so wrote: » Sweden, Germany, France, Czechy, Switzerland, Belgium, Finland, Norway, Holland, Greece, UK, South Korea, NZ etc.
bettyoleary wrote: » Re Opening schools puts the whole community, c ountry in danger od opening schools again during a Pandemic. Firstly, once people are enclosed in small spaces the virus spreads. Age makes no difference. Why not just wait for the vaccine. Its coming.
byhookorbycrook wrote: » E36Ross wrote: » School transport to operate FULLY as normal.....Kids to wear masks and sit by siblings or others from there group.https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/715f5-government-approves-over-375-million-support-package-and-publishes-roadmap-to-enable-safe-return-of-schools/ The “ group “ don’t seem travel on the same buses . In our school alone we have over a dozen buses coming to the school . If there are to be “ staggered drop offs “ as the “ plan” says , how will buses manage ?
E36Ross wrote: » School transport to operate FULLY as normal.....Kids to wear masks and sit by siblings or others from there group.https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/715f5-government-approves-over-375-million-support-package-and-publishes-roadmap-to-enable-safe-return-of-schools/
Jim_Hodge wrote: » You avoided the question again. What is the relevance to reopening schools during a pandemic?
Boggles wrote: » Which dozen countries?
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » I think you'll be in for a surprise if you think teachers unions will be able to manage forcing the masks issue on children. Even they have their limits.
coffeyt wrote: » Please tell me you are not a teacher because I despair to think someone with your opinion of children could be in a position where you have any impact on their education. My 4 & 5 year old would most certainly never spit at a teacher or anyone else for that matter. I sincerely doubt you have any real interaction with children if that's the way you think they behave.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » It's happening whether you like it or not, at least there's a bit of clarity now. As for your other hysteria riddled posts about children and young teens, disgusting comments.
is_that_so wrote: » Why choose Israel? Why not any one of a dozen other countries who safely reopened schools without adverse effects? Israel's problems were compounded by the use of air conditioning, an excellent vector in its own right.
lawred2 wrote: » Schools had to reopen. Simple as that. Everything else is opening. Offices can wait where work from home is possible but children need education and we can't be the only nation keeping our kids out of school.
FishOnABike wrote: » Back in March we weren't meeting /mixing with people outside our own household. Only essential businesses remained open. We were asked to stay at home, exercise within a 2km radius, only make essential journeys e.g. to buy groceries or medicines. Coilte had put up signs by the local woodland walk to keep to your own household group, socially distance from other groups, not to arrange for groups to meet and to go somewhere else if it was too crowded. Israel had reduced the daily new cases to a low level. Schools played a major part in the resurgence of CoViD-19 there, surpassing the daily new case rate seen in March /April. We'd all like things to be as normal as possible but we don't always get what we'd like. If we don't take sufficient public health measures we risk following Israel's footsteps, shutting down schools and finding ourselves back where we were three months ago.
morebabies wrote: » "The plan recognises that some children who have complex medical or special educational needs may not be able to return to school at the end of August because the relevant public health guidelines indicate they are at “very high risk”. Schools will have discretion to manage and redistribute their teaching support resources in order to best meet the learning needs of these students."https://www.education.ie/en/Press-Events/Press-Releases/2020-press-releases/PR20-07-27.html If anyone is looking for info on medically vulnerable children, this is all I could find. I'd be ever so grateful if anyone comes across anything else if you could share it here please.
Jim_Hodge wrote: » You're ignoring what my post was in reference to (nothing unusual there). You said schools would not reopen fully before a vaccine. Accept you were wrong and the other poster was not, as you called them, deluded. The rest of your post is just deflection. I've no plans to converse with you at Christmas nor at any time, if I can avoid it.