Sunny Disposition wrote: » Money for construction labourers went up a lot during the good times, it did get to a stage where it was crazy for what they were doing. But it can be hard work, not something to be sniffed at, generally able to make a reasonable living in that line of work.
Randy Archer wrote: » Manufacturing is a start. Even super markets (obviously not a labourer );have dropped the amount of staff needed on the tills with the installation of self service check outs . Imagine paying a till lady over 10 euro an hour ? No chance Farms hands were pricy during the boom too Security on building sites and cleaners were taking the piss during the boom
mgn wrote: » Whats wrong with earning good money as a labourer, a lot of it is hard physical work and can be dangerous at times.
Randy Archer wrote: They don’t want to do hard physical work, they ought to have worked harder in school . We can always hire immigrants who will do it for cheaper , or robots (for some trades )
Sebastian Dangerfield wrote: » Jesus I was on about £200 in 2000 for the same thing with Sisk. Wish my timing had been better!
mfceiling wrote: » I'm not criticising but a labourer shouldn't be earning colossal money. 99% of the labourers I've met on site haven't the hands to wipe their arse with. I remember one lad showing us his pay slip in 2004. Just short of €1200....for sweeping floors. That's wrong.
Randy Archer wrote: » Define good money though. Why should they be earning way more than they And the work are worth ? That then makes everything expensive and we become uncompetitive . Sorry, but a monkey could do some of them jobs. Hell, no wonder employers are installing robots wherever they can They don’t want to do hard physical work, they ought to have worked harder in school . We can always hire immigrants who will do it for cheaper , or robots (for some trades )
partyguinness wrote: » No idea TBH. Look's like it though from a poster above. I have not darkened the door of Legg's since the summer of 04. The Viper Room was another regular place...saw Eamon Dunphy holding court there a few times in flying form. Think it is gone now. Often went to Legg's after the Viper Room for the 2am to 4am slot.
Glebee wrote: » Had to meet a developer in Drogheda one time in relation to a small bit of work at the height of the boom. When he pulled up in an Austin Martin DB9 my jaw dropped.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Yes, same. But it's interesting that you say even labourers on building sites were earning more than your desk job. I'm not criticising, but why not? Building physical infrastructure is real, difficult and valuable work.
duffysfarm wrote: » If thats true then it would be a surd sign of lack of class and i bet you that hys father would never do anything like that
Blitzkrieger wrote: » Myself and most of the lads I worked with were either over qualified for the job we were in, or had professional qualifications for another field altogether. So we weren't on the dole line, but none of us could find jobs in the field/level we were qualified at. And laborers on building sites were getting a better hourly rate than us - we were only making a decent living by working lots of overtime.
PhilOssophy wrote: » I heard a rumour that Sean Quinn (Jnr I think) that his party piece was to light cigars with money in his local golf club or pub. I always wondered was it true or not.
Deleted User wrote: » I bought a house in 2000 and cleared the mortgage in 2007. At the same time asI was sorting the mortgage I went into the back for a car loan, but I wanted to borrow the sum, and make one payment to clear the loan in 12 months.
CrankyHaus wrote: » I used to find Casinos pretty grim for late drinks. All the bright lighting and lads putting on serious poker faces would suck the craic out of your pissed buzz fairly quick.