Cyrus wrote: » one assumes you would have come up with the template regardless ?
unhappys10 wrote: » Not necessarily, I had the time at home to think about what could make my life easier instead of being sat in an office with distractions and a 4 hour round trip commuting dealing with traffic and idiots on the road.
fret_wimp2 wrote: » Perhaps my group of friends and the various organizations we work for are the exception though, and everyone else will be ordered back to their desks at the earliest option.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » Fine for people who have enough space in their houses for office chairs - but many don't.People making allowances for dogs / kids in the background is fine in pandemic circumstances, but won't last forever. Not being responsible for kids during work hours will soon enough be a requirement.
Biker79 wrote: » There arent as many options as you might think. Other companies wont neccessarily be offering something different. If anythign we could see most companies hunkering down, reluctant to try untested ways of working. 5 months isnt long enough to test WFH as a permanent option.
Bambi wrote: » How long would you say is long enough, 12 months? 18 months? 5 years? 5-6 months is as long a test as most companies would envisage for a change to an organisation
Biker79 wrote: » 12 months. Policies surrounding ergonomics/ equipment are still not in place they will also need to see how hiring fits in to existing teams or how to create effective teams from scratch when they are all WFH. My guess is that many companies will be reluctant until the legislation is sorted out and they are protected legally from potential health and safety/ data security issues. 5 months has been a good bit but its not there yet. The only thing that has been proven is the technology.
The Spider wrote: » Doesn't matter what those companies want or think, fact is the talent will go to companies that provide the best lifestyle, companies that dont offer wfh will be in the minority, they will lose any talent they have, when they try and refill those positions the only people that will take them are people who can't work elsewhere
Biker79 wrote: » Otherwise, other roles that have a personal relationship component with an 'in person' value, will be needed back in the Office.
Jim2007 wrote: » Except that there are very few people that want a personal relationship with you at this stage.... Most people would prefer to hear you at the end of the phone these days.
Obese Child wrote: » Been working from home for years... On the dole
Mr Meanor wrote: » According to this article If your in high paid middle management it seems the company didn't miss you! Companies now saying maybe they don't need them back, ever.https://www.theladders.com/career-advice/this-billionaire-investor-says-white-collar-workers-jobs-are-in-jeopardy
Bambi wrote: » Did anyone ever think these "high value roles" were really necessary?
Biker79 wrote: » Higher value jobs revolve around strong personal relationships. Lower value roles dont need as many. Its a bit brutal but I believe this is how WFH is being shaped. Ive seen evidence of it in my own company and among our clients in recent weeks. I guess it depends on the business, but there will be general truths shared among all organisations.
Jaziel Unkempt Photographer wrote: » I disagree, in my experience it’s the highly skilled roles particularly in tech etc that are much more open to working from home even before the covid situation. You very rarely see low skilled roles working from home has they are generally hands on etc. Look at the companies who are making work from town full time for the rest of the year and possibly for good for people who want it, it’s all the big multinational tech firms with some of the highest skilled works and best paid in the country. There is a bit of an under current of anti-work from time from a few posters on the forum and I really don’t get it, WFH is almost all positives even if it’s not everyday it should be absolutely the norm for a few days a week or even most of the time of the role allows it.
Cyrus wrote: » A lot of the people in tech companies in Ireland are in sales or support services , the engineers etc are all on the west coast. Sales jobs can be done from home but I’d disagree they are highly skilled. LinkedIn are laying off a good few heads now as well
maherhonda wrote: » What is this nonsense? Do you understand how IT works and the different area's of it. Currently 760 IT jobs in Dublin on Irishjobs. Thats not including the likes of Google, Facebook, Amazon etc. Could add on another 600 for those.
Jaziel Unkempt Photographer wrote: » The average Facebook salary in Ireland is 154k, they aren’t mostly sales and support. Large numbers are developers, project and program managers etc all which are highly skilled, highly paid and have always been work from home regularly even before covid. Not allowing working from home for desk based jobs is old fashioned backward thinking.
Cyrus wrote: » Yes I worked in one of the companies mentioned and it was sales , finance and support services.
maherhonda wrote: » Do you work in IT as you probably don't have a clue what was actually involved in these services otherwise.
maherhonda wrote: » Do you work in IT as you probably don't have a clue what was actually involved in these services otherwise. Network engineers, Storage engineers, Programmers, Cloud engineers, Data center engineers etc, Design engineers, Linux Engineers, Windows Engineers, Messaging engineers, Security, Pen testing. The actual cheek to think these are not high skilled jobs.
maherhonda wrote: » The actual cheek to think these are not high skilled jobs.
Cyrus wrote: » I know a few people in Facebook who have done well, large part of their remuneration was in the stock based comp they got , they were all in sales or sales management . If you think any of the brains of these companies are located anywhere but in the west coast you are codding yourself .