Deleted User wrote: » Also, if you have zero cases and zero deaths for a month, you don't have an R number - just a divide by zero error
BPKS wrote: » Yes - instead they should have left the pub at 9 o clock and all gone back to the same house to continue drinking.
Humilde wrote: » Anyone who questions or goes against the oficial line is not contacted anymore for comment. Kind of ironic that this is now happening given that the virus originated from a place where free speech is only an aspiration for most.
PhilOssophy wrote: » Don't brew too much, it was intended as a short term measure but whatever! I'm not sure the market for cheap slop brewed by some chancer is as hot as you'd expect....but you work away and let us know how you get on! Many more would just switch to "cheaper, illegal drugs" just because the price of alcohol went up by a few quid? Really, really doubt that myself. I think about 18-25 year old me, I certainly wouldn't have moved on to harder stuff just because the price of drink went up (and if I had, I'd be dead by now because the price of drink went up consistently during that period!)
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » You're talking about tripling or quadrupling the price of drink, though. So double down and stick in some anecdata... no, you still haven't made an argument, sorry. You also ignored the fact that you are punishing many responsible people because of the irresponsible actions of a few. I've seen plenty of teenagers talking the absolute p*ss about gathering in large groups and not distancing, but they don't need any drink or drugs to do that.
Jackman25 wrote: » No mention of bars in LLeida.
Richard Hillman wrote: » You have to look at the types that are pushing for this within the medical Quangos and NGOs. High level Medical professionals are the types that shoot 600-625 in a leaving cert and remain hermits throughout their university education. Then when they got into their jobs they became careerists. Pushing for promotion after promotion. They have robot personalities. Socially inadequate. They see life in an analytical perspective. Fair play to them, they have succeeded professionally, they must be earning a packet. But I am not taking social advice from them and they have absolutely no business in trying to interfere with our social lives beyond a national emergency, of which it is over.
LuasSimon wrote: » Should pubs that serve food not be closed as well ? I can’t drink 6 pints in the local pub but I can drink 6 pints in a pub 500 yards down the road after I eat a club sandwich and chips ?
PhilOssophy wrote: » We'll agree to differ, you're saying my argument is lame, well I'd say your arguments is nonsense.
hmmm wrote: » They're not operating as pubs, they're operating as restaurants. If they're taking the piss out of this rule and allowing people sit there for the night drinking pints over a shared packet of peanuts, they are putting the entire industry at risk.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Happening all over. We all know it. Many of us have experienced it
GazzaL wrote: » I'd rather that than the fear mongering that is making some people nearly **** themselves at the sight of another human being.
Bit cynical wrote: » I thing the reality of the suppression strategy is kicking in. If you go down this route, you need to keep restrictions in place until a vaccine becomes available; you can't just lift them when numbers become low. Moreover, by preventing healthy people from contracting the virus, you lower natural immunity in the population further necessitating the need for restrictions. Politically we have to continue with this until either the economy or society can't sustain it any more or a vaccine becomes available.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » The Us have thrown trillions at the economy to keep the show on the road.
Hurrache wrote: » Pretty much all that money has gone into companies coffers, many who don't need a single cent, it hasn't filtered down to the public and employees.
murpho999 wrote: » OK, but it doesn't make it right does it? I'd say they'll get caught eventually.
GazzaL wrote: » NPHET are a clear illustration of the difference between education and intelligence. There are 11 people in hospital in the whole country with COVID-19, yet here they are leaving huge numbers of people with non-COVID illnesses go undiagnosed and untreated, destroying people's livelihoods, and inventing solutions to problems that don't exist like forcing people to wear face masks in shops that have been safely open throughout the pandemic. The most stupid of them talk about "eradicating" the virus in Ireland, which is impossible unless we become the next North Korea.
Charles Babbage wrote: » They aren't leaving people untreated, the problems in the health service are caused by those who continue to transmit the virus meaning that any form of treatment is potentially dangerous. But sure who cares about cancer patients so long as you can get your 5 hours drinking in the same place. First things first.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Of course not. They wont get caught. Maybe 5% of them will get caught . The other 95% will be making bank
PhilOssophy wrote: » Absolutely, and sure NPHET should be formed of a group of online users who are experts in the spread of infectious diseases based on "what they see around them", I mean who needs to have 10+ years studying medicine when you have such geniuses thinking the pubs opening wouldn't be any problem whatsoever, PADDY KNOWS BETTER!