Mortelaro wrote: » Funerals aren't touched, they just get lip service Its just such a pity so many ordinary funerals stuck by the numbers rule resulting in more grief As Sinn Féin have shown, it was all for nothing
FrancieBrady wrote: » So 1800 'RA men and women can turn up at a funetal and nobody does anything? GFA stays intact? You guys credibility just finally gave it's last sigh and departed. 1800 'RA. Just wow!
Mortelaro wrote: » I didn't say they were 'Ra Why are you saying I did? My comment was on numbers
FrancieBrady wrote: » You answered my question about the RA by saying 'funerals aren't touched'. Why would you say that if you didn't think they were the IRA?
Pkiernan wrote: » What about funerals for Gerry and Mary Lou's disappeared?
Mortelaro wrote: » Because I meant by coronavirus fines or police action regarding that,have you heard of any north or south? I haven't
FrancieBrady wrote: » My question was very specifically about what the poster was claiming.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » This thread has 195 pages so far.They really haven't gone away and their apologists are a total disgrace. But they never recognised An Garda Siochana as being legitimate anyway. Remember your man Ferris bringing Garda killers home from Castlerea? The underbelly of SF will forever be associated with this kind of thing. It will never go away for the vast majority. And look at the calibre of some of the candidates elected this year also. The local SF Cumainn have a lot to answer for as has MLMD. Anyway, I await the backlash. But I don't care anymore. Hope the time in opposition works out for them all. Hurlers on the ditch as always, with a dark underbelly.
Mortelaro wrote: » It would be ridiculous to think there are 1800 Ra members in the North at this stage,they stopped recruiting in the mid 90's I'd say even you're not a member The 1800 stewards alone broke the rules by a factor of 60 But in good old Irish policing,the funeral wasn't stopped out of pragmatic respect for the dead Such a high profile funeral because of the numbers has to be investigated but Mon knows no charges will be laid Thats not a vindication The whole thing is an affront to 1000's of grieving who stuck to the rules though because they were told to by Michelle I'll have a random man take a selfie with his arm around me o neill that they had to She being hugged when 100's of grannies and grandads were dying alone An absolute disgrace
FrancieBrady wrote: » So everyone...including Unionists, the British, the various monitoring bodies are looking at the 'RA, 1800 strong openly parading the streets of Belfast and doing nothing about it? Cool story.
FrancieBrady wrote: » To be honest I think a lot of your opinion is politics based. Had MON's involvement in the selfie and the incidents of no social distancing not happened the vast vast majority of people would have had the compassion and empathy they had when they said nothing about the same issues9bar the selfies) at the state funeral and the SDLP one.
Truthvader wrote: » As far as I am concerned Sinn Fein and the 'RA as you call them are one and the same. Some like Adams, Ferris, Slab, Story, Ellis etc actively involved in subhuman behaviour and others such as the lovely Mary Lou and Michelle willing glove puppets happy to scratch out what grubby advantage they can to boost their careers.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I don't see them any differently to soldiers returning to normal life after a conflict/war. Awful things are done in war and conflict, but millions have returned to normal and fulfilling lives after.
Truthvader wrote: » Thats the big big lie Francie. There was no war. The "soldiers" were squealing about a shoot to kill policy when the Brits shot back: only willing to do "active service" if it involved burying a woman on a beach, planting a bomb in a pub full of young people or breaking the legs of terrified teenagers. Cruel criminal scum of the very lowest kind
FrancieBrady wrote: » Anyone could childishly pick out things other soldiers do in wars too Truth. IMO it was a war, not in the conventional sense, but a war nonetheless. I always use conflict/war because this silly debate is tiresome.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Go to bed so and have a rest so from your incessant posting. The vast majority do not agree with you, and will not.
Bowie wrote: » The clue is in how it was stopped.
Bowie wrote: » Except the Irish Government, British Government and members of the general public, hard to gauge how many TBF. T'was a political conflict. The clue is in how it was stopped.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Despicable organisation is SF, it tries so much to push forward the so called intellectuals like O'Broin to prove how progressive and educated some of their cohort are. And do their best to bring the middle class into their fold. Few will be taken in by this, as the core vote couldn't even spell his name, and they are full of RA stuff anyway from the start. The day someone changes my mind about this I will reconsider, but for now, NO. Too much involvement from NI. Ugh.
Finty Lemon wrote: » In 2014 Bobby Storey issued an email to all SF councillors enforcing silence on the issue of sexual abuse allegations against IRA members.
Bowie wrote: » I see SF and the IRA as connected. Did you know some SF members were in the IRA? True story. More members of the public voted for SF than FG. Oops.