smacl wrote: » I see that Tommy Robinson / Stephen Yaxley-Lennon got jailed today for nine months
robindch wrote: » Not only that, but poor little Tommeh/Stephen has had enough of English law and now wants to become a refugee himself
smacl wrote: » Don't know why he's panicking, no doubt there will be a place for him in Boris's new government.
Odhinn wrote: » Meanwhile, Gemma is stating that the whole Tuam babies incident is a hoax.
volchitsa wrote: » As an aside. "Mandate of Heaven": Isn't it a wonderful way to make your opinion on stuff seem far more important - suddenly it's not just your own thoughts, you get to decide who "Heaven" is rooting for too. How did we not see long ago what a scam this whole religion carry-on was?
Odhinn wrote: » How do you get informed you have the "mandate of heaven" in the first place? Phonecall? E-mail? Skype? burning bush?
Facebook has removed online ads and posts by President Trump's reelection campaign for violating its rules prohibiting "organized hate," a step the ad biz has been reluctant to take. The ads, which are said to have been circulating on Facebook since June 3, 2020, claimed that dangerous mobs of left-wing groups are running riot, and urged ad viewers to add their names to a marketing list and donate money to the Trump campaign. According to Media Matters, the ads were revised on June 17, 2020, to include a red triangle symbol that was used by the Nazis to identify political prisoners in concentration camps. The watchdog group says the Trump campaign ran 88 of these ads yesterday. The Anti-Defamation League identifies 88 as a hate symbol. It's used to refer to the eighth letter of the Latin alphabet, "H," which repeated twice can stand for "Heil Hitler." What's more, the first sentence in these ads is 14 words, also a white supremacist dogwhistle. Quite a coincidence it seems.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Interesting that religious organisations can be classified as businesses when it comes to handouts, but charities when it comes to paying taxes
Peregrinus wrote: » The principles of secularity require this, surely?
Pherekydes wrote: » And why doesn't the principle of secularity apply when it comes to taxes? Then they hide behind religion.
Peregrinus wrote: » It does. Churches get the same tax treatment, by and large, as other non-profits.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Which doesn't address the issue of why promotion of religion is seen as a charitable purpose in itself.