MipMap wrote: » WHY? You a homophobe or what. You just don't like people talking about things you don't agree with?
Sconsey wrote: » My mistake, it is not yet, but it will be soon. I look forward to it, you can maybe lie your way onto the bus.
weldoninhio wrote: » Still no sign of legislation making it “mandatory”.
MickeyLeari wrote: » So still only advisory on public transport?
MickeyLeari wrote: » So still sensible on public transport?
Dubl07 wrote: » Fixed your post. Honestly, some people are total twerps. We're advised to walk or cycle and to wear masks if on public transport or indoor areas. Why don't you understand the reasoning behind that? It's not to deprive you of anything; it's to keep you and others safe and healthy.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » Why are you waiting for things to be mandatory? Did you wait to drive until you got your full license?
weldoninhio wrote: » EDIT: I also won't be wearing one when they become mandatory.
Jim_Hodge wrote: » May I, on behalf of the community, thank you for your concern and efforts to keep people healthy and allow the economy to move towards recovery?:rolleyes:
Boggles wrote: » It's bizarre people stating as fact that restriction measures will not be reintroduced here if cases start to rise again. What do people think will happen, we will all just wash our hands faster and that will do it? How are we different to other places?Stage three lockdown restrictions reimposed on metropolitan Melbourne and Mitchell Shire 4.9 million people.
McGiver wrote: » Lahinch, holiday resort on the Atlantic Way, in Co Clare. Full of people, almost business as usual. Americans, Spanish, Irish young people. Pubs regulate number of people inside but I can't see how that achieves anything. We were sitting in a tiny café with 12 other people. No masks anyone including the staff, they just have glass shield at the counter, that's all.
Living Off The Splash wrote: » I would have just kept on walking. I guess there are now going to be two camps. Those that give a toss and those who don't give a toss. The problem for me as someone who gives a toss is that I don't want to be near those who don't give a toss.
Jim_Hodge wrote: » Fully agree. If it is a small cafe with 12 people then you get up, tell them you don't think it's safe, or abiding by the protocols, and leave.
weldoninhio wrote: » Coronavirus is well gone from the community in Ireland.
Allinall wrote: » How do you know this?
Tork wrote: » There is increasing evidence to suggest that the virus is airborne and that the particles linger in the air for longer than anyone thought. And with people moving around more, and air travel resuming, it's foolhardy to assume that the community transmission rates will remain as low as they currently are. It is still a highly infectious virus and it still has the potential to spread like wildfire.
joeguevara wrote: » The scientific evidence on the protection efficacy of masks makes it so difficult for anyone to agree. The newest research on the BBC website this morning suggests that it protects the wearer as well as those around them. Prof Paul Edelstein from the University of Pennsylvania, who wrote the other report which examined the effectiveness of masks and other coverings, said the evidence that they protected other people was "clearer all the time", but there was also "some evidence" they protected the wearer.
CalamariFritti wrote: » So now the next scare scenario 'airborne' is being rolled out. Anything to prevent any attempt at getting back to normal. First it was contact/smear infection. We mustn't be touching anything. Turned out that was more or less bollix. Next it was going to be the supermarkets that were going to be 'super spreader' havens. Turned out that was more or less bollix. FFs at some stage it was deemed unsafe to go outside, to the beach or the forest. Unbelievable. This is a fkn coronavirus, they've been around forever. The common cold is a corona virus. How the fk is it that only half baked science is available on all this but yet its being rolled out in an ever increasing scare escalation and very little hard evidence on anything is available. Meanwhile statistics are dodgy as fk. Sorry but we have seen an unprecedented restriction of social and political liberties. We scared entire populations under their beds including our own. 'I have a hunch' and 'it seems logical' doesn't cut it. Enough is enough.
Seanergy wrote: » Holohan and the HSE can't get beyond coughing and sneezing and dirty hands as modes of transmission. They even scrubbed talking as a mode of transmisison when drawing up covid-19 literature. The WHO still promote talking as a mode of transmission, we do not. Breathing will probably be recognised as a mode of transmsiion before we openly admit to talking as one. More pressure on the much coverted N95 masks and respirators. Ireland are operating a delayed learning strategy.International Society for Aerosols in Medicine