Murple wrote: » Will they be playing matches of close to 6 hours in length in two teams of 15 on a mini indoor playing pitch with a low ceiling and limited ventilation?
wirelessdude01 wrote: » After-school activities in many schools are viewed as cheap child care. I run one in my school and parents will openly say this.
average_runner wrote: » So no inter school sports but they are ok for kids to be playing all the sports in the evenings and weekends?
lulublue22 wrote: » If HSE advice is to be followed no or is it expected that schools just don’t follow any sort of health and safety advice ?
meeeeh wrote: » I don't think any other sector put out so many preconditions before talks on implementation even started. Department for education is poor but no other sector union or organisation approached things less constructively. Everyone else seems to be able suggest how things can be done, teachers unions come out first with what can't be done. I'm sorry but instead of criticizing media reaction you might look at unions. Being realistic only works when you are also constructive. Just being realistic and whinge doesn't resolve anything.
deiseindublin wrote: » You do know that schools and DoE have no control over student weekend activities, right?
khalessi wrote: » It amazes me that people would complain about looking for basic hygiene such as soap and hot water or that we would look for guidelines to ensure that their children are safe too.
Lillyfae wrote: » Nobody is complaining about this. Everyone agrees that it should have been in place way before the pandemic. But in order to bring buildings up to standard, individual school management need to bring this to the attention of the DoE surely, and not just "soldier on". Ditto teachers using their own salaries in order to stock their classrooms with essential equipment.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Inspectors are constantly in and out of schools, so everyone is aware of things but the amount of things swept under the carpet is ridiculous. Just look at all those new schools that weren't built properly and needed remedial works over the past number of years. With the dept, if there is a corner to be cut them a blunt hacksaw is used and the edges aren't even smoothed out.
average_runner wrote: » You do know it was from the HSE Guidelines?
khalessi wrote: » Meanwhile people like yourself comment on teachers looking for equal treatment to protect staff and students. Schoolsa are places of education as well as workplaces and are entitled to equal protection other workplaces get. It amazes me that people would complain about looking for basic hygiene such as soap and hot water or that we would look for guidelines to ensure that their children are safe too.
meeeeh wrote: » Don't pretend it's about looking for hand sanitiser, that's easily resolved. Also childcare managed to open. Because they are private business who get paid only when they are open they managed to find solutions (yes I know there are limits), shops, restaurant staff everyone else is managing. If the approach would be lets see how we can get back it would be fine. But it's not, the approach of unions is we are not coming back unless...
Millem wrote: » Everyone has reopened with social distancing or more staff?
History Queen wrote: » Ok. If it is so easy you tell us how it is all so easily solved... I'll save you the bother. The Deot need to pay for the extra safety measures. That solves the issues.
lulublue22 wrote: » I presume HSE guidelines are tailored for different sectors and not a one size fits all. The HSE have obviously decided that sport - by and large played outdoors with smaller numbers than school settings needs a certain set of guidelines to operate some what safely and that schools with a bigger cohort of individuals primarily indoors in relatively small spaces needs a different set of guidelines. I really don't see the difficulty with this. Sporting activities are by and large optional and if one is not happy with how its operated then one doesn’t need to attend. That’s not an option for schooling. I presume that by and large sporting activities would have less immunocompromised children attending than a school situation or again at least the option of not participating. I presume the underlying concept is to have schools reopen and as far as possible stay open. That might require stricter / different guidelines than a sporting activity.
BonsaiKitten wrote: » This. The inspectorate are teachers as well, they know what the reality of daily life in a school is. Some don't care. They're not all bad, you get great ones tbf but the Dept don't really want to listen to them either.
Lillyfae wrote: » This cannot be the end of it. What is the point of your union at all? Working conditions are an absolute corner stone and they need to be fighting for you, not merely mentioning a problem and then fading back into the background. Anyone who is paying for school supplies out of their own pocket is fully endorsing being ignored by the DoE. Sure why would they listen when their employees are saving them thousands a year by begging a second (besides income tax) contribution from parents and giving their salary back to their employer in supplies....