Lillyfae wrote: » Somebody else brought up the UK, not me, but there are plenty of other countries where schools are run in this way where the outcomes are fine. No I don’t want an admin principal. I just don’t think a teaching qualification and career is sufficient to be the principal of a school, and that is what every school in the country has.
downthemiddle wrote: » What a startling insight. Do you think the vomit magically disappears all on its own? I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence of your claim of strike action. Surely you don't make statements you can't substantiate.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » That would sort of ape the UK system. Trust me we don't want that coming in here. Schools run as businesses and pitted against each other for funding. A discussion for a totally different thread though.
downthemiddle wrote: » How would you define the role of the principal?
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » Evidence of claim of strike action? Evidence? Give it a few weeks.
Lillyfae wrote: » Facility and procurement expert with management capabilities.
downthemiddle wrote: » You need to cut that fringe girl. It is clearly interfering with your view of the world.
downthemiddle wrote: » You don't place any value on their ability as educators?
Lillyfae wrote: » No, because they shouldn’t be educating. They should be running a school. There’s plenty of work in that.
downthemiddle wrote: » So who has overall responsibility for the quality of teaching and learning in the school?
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » Why because I don't share your views? Opinions are like a**holes, everyone has one but they all think each others stink.
Lillyfae wrote: » The department of education.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Think they meant within a school?
Lillyfae wrote: » The department of education have inspectors, right?
downthemiddle wrote: » Can you suggest how that structure should be managed in over 4,000 schools?
downthemiddle wrote: » So the role of the inspector is to manage the quality of teaching and learning in an individual school?
s1ippy wrote: » ?? Assholes don't have the capacity to think.
KerryConnor wrote: » See attached government expenditure on education by Country - you can see ireland is well down. Everyone wants kids back full time by late August .. So we should presuise government to put the money and staff into it. Teachers aren't asking for pay rises (which someone here suggested) but funding for more staff and resources which will benefit our kids massively
Lillyfae wrote: » It’s kind of like that now, right? Primary and secondary schools both have standardized testing that highlight issues in learning. If there’s an issue with the teaching that’s easy to discover and assess.
Lillyfae wrote: » That is completely shocking and I 100% support adequately funding schools. The whole system and it’s facilities need to be razed to the ground and totally overhauled. This is a first world country, for Gods sake! We’re on a par with Romania here...
BonsaiKitten wrote: » The primary purpose of Drumcondra/ Sigma/ Micra tests is as a means of screening children to determine who might need additional supports. It's not a check up on the school, it assesses the kids relative to national progress. Now, if the class drops as a whole then the principal might look into why - but sometimes a drop is expected (like with the revised Drumcondras last year). Often an individual drop in STEN can be attributed to issues on the day. It's good to have some kind of standardised test I think but I wouldn't treat them as the be all and end all.