owlbethere wrote: » A few months will bring us to Christmas time and we will have a better understanding of the virus, treatments and any potential vaccines. Once Christmas and New year ends, we are into a new year and a new spring come February. It really isn't all that hard to wait it out for a vaccine. I have confidence in the London vaccine. It was developed in relation to MERS that emerged in 2012. That MERS vaccine was already gone into trials. All they had to do was tweak the vaccine to this coronavirus. They now gone into phase 3 of the trail and production has started of the vaccine. I don't think they would have gone into phase 3 of the trails if phase 1 and 2 were a flop. For me, the biggest risk is travelling and crowed spaces. I grew up without yearly holidays and I have no problem waiting it out for a year or even two if that's what it takes until a vaccine comes about.
robfowler78 wrote: » Sorry I Have to ask how will you finance this year or 2 year lockdown. I take it you are paid in full at home maybe I'm wrong. It just seems to me that people assume everyone can afford an indefinite lockdown. I know I couldn't survive on 350 a week longterm.
Minier81 wrote: » And no government could afford 350 a week longterm, it would become the standard unemployment rate. Having said that I have no intention of going near a busy pub or going on a foreign holiday til next year.
bucketybuck wrote: » This is the question I was about to ask. People keep talking about "waiting it out" as if it is just a matter of going back into a hole and hibernating for the winter. As if it is just a matter of putting your feet up with a sherry and enjoying the time off. The reality is that there are very real and very serious consequences to "waiting it out". Businesses are going bust, people are losing jobs, families are breaking up, people are getting sicker from other illnesses going untreated, children are missing out on their education. A few months apparently means until Christmas. That is 6 months. How many people will lose their jobs and then their homes in that 6 months? Do they not matter?
owlbethere wrote: » I was talking about holidays abroad and not holidaying. I continue to work but outside of that, I'm happy to put my head down and keep life low key and take it easy in time off, avoid crowds. I don't think I'm putting my life on hold. My life is so much more richer now in time and energy.
phormium wrote: » I'm wondering how not opening pubs though will help, was speaking to a friend this morning who mentioned he was out last night, so I asked sure where could you have been? Turns out a bus load of them went to a private house where a bar has been installed, a large bar by all accounts, bigger than my kitchen apparently! These were not even a group of people who were all known to each other and friends previously but associated through work with the 'pub' owner and all just invited for a night out. He said they were told to wear masks for the bus but admitted everyone took them off as soon as the journey started. Turns out this is not the first in house 'bar' he has been to either, amazing what's going on in the countryside!
UrbanSprawl wrote: » The second wave will certainly come very few are immune..is coronavirus a hoax I doubt it .Lockdown slowed it but we cant be lockdowned 4ever if ppl can get with the program we might ride this thing out if we pretend its grand or its doesnt affect and behave like brits well it will spread
UrbanSprawl wrote: The second wave will certainly come very few are immune..is coronavirus a hoax I doubt it .Lockdown slowed it but we cant be lockdowned 4ever if ppl can get with the program we might ride this thing out if we pretend its grand or its doesnt affect and behave like brits well it will spread
owlbethere wrote: » Teresa mannion was on the news yesterday and what she said when reporting around the West was striking. She said if we behave with common sense and follow the governments guidelines we can hopefully have some normality and safely reopen. Those weren't her exact words but that was the gist of it. It makes sense.
xl500 wrote: » I after 4 months went for lunch yesterday in a hotel I was very impressed with the way they were setup great social distancing great sanitising very professional On the way home my wife wanted to visit the new Decathlon store well what a difference this place is a disaster waiting to happen if an infected person happens to visit There was no control at all kids running everywhere people handling clothes sports equipment putting them back next person handling the same items again I did not see one member of staff wearing gloves or masks I find it unreal that you can only sit for a limited time in bar but in retail it seems anything goes
MickeyLeari wrote: » I think most retail has dealt with this very well. Agree to call out one business (and you are not the first to do so with that new business) but not fair on the whole sector. Can you indicate the hotel where you had a good experience?
Walnut Salad wrote: » My uncle is a regular at his village pub. He went in last night, sat at the bar and drank with 2 friends for 5 hours. To be fair they were the only 3 at the bar. The barman did not ask them to order any food and many people at the 'dining' tables were only eating a punnet of chips. He said it was 'busy' too.
ax530 wrote: » pleased for him nice to get that normality back and many people only want a few drinks not a full meal. Mixed reports about sitting at bars lots of people seem to think having high stools on premises is an offence.
Limpy wrote: » Covid is.more or less gone from the community, unless a health worker brings it back in.
B.A._Baracus wrote: » I am no expert but wasn't there 18 new confirmed cases reported yesterday? and something like a week ago there was around 4. Sounds to me like to virus multiplying again.