History Queen wrote: » Yes. I've consistently said that. I believe solutions will be found.
PowerToWait wrote: » Take one for the team? This is one of the dumbest posts this week.
tom1ie wrote: » WFH for most employees gives the same output as when those employees are in the office. Doesn’t work for teachers as they are not teaching the kids on a daily basis. Furthermore as the kids are not in school this effects the parents who wfh who have to up their game even more to compensate for the teacher not being in their workplace, at the same time as staying productive via wfh.
History Queen wrote: » You do realise many teachers are also parents and faced the same issues? Lots of workplaces, like schools, were not setup for remote working and didn't have the same output. Staff still got paid. Some workers were essential but couldn't work remotely so got paid as normal but didn't work at all or worked very little but were'on call' in case of breakdowns to essential services(ESB engineers for example).
tom1ie wrote: » When, by who? The week before schools go back will not be good enough. Parents and Teachers need lead in times.
tom1ie wrote: » Lol! Esb engineers were in work the whole time. The solution Is for teachers to wear appropriate ppe after risk assessing the situation. Tell me why this is not the answer.
History Queen wrote: » I agree with you! Teachers are constantly pleading with the Department of Education to work more efficiently. Look at the rough guidelines they issued this week. AFTER schools had closed. Guidelines on remote teaching were issued weeks after schools began remote teaching. LC predictive grade guidelines issued weeks after teachers were told to begin the work! It is a hugely inefficient Dept in dire need of an overhaul.
tom1ie wrote: » Well I don’t know but the people on the ground are blaming the teachers. This may not be the case as you state above but your union is doing a ****e job of explains this. Will the new minister make any difference? Does she have a clue? I’ll be honest I’ve never heard of her. I just wanna get my young kids back into their education now.
History Queen wrote: » That's the message I'm trying to get across. We (teachers) are not the issue here. We want to know sooner rather than later what will be happening also. I'm hopeful for this minister as she was still teaching until February this year and should be very aware of day to day realities in schools as a result. Shes unknown as she is a first time TD. Saying that we've had teachers as minister before and it didn't help. Who knows?
tom1ie wrote: » Do you think we will have a workable solution in place that involves all kids getting 5 days a week starting September?
iamwhoiam wrote: » Tony Holohan just said that it is up to the Department of Ed to get guidance from NPHET and to implement them He is right , like every other business they got advice and acted on it . Now is the time to get everything in order so that everything is ready to go in September . That is down to the DoE and the unions will have to accept that in my opinion Am I understanding it right that a junior school that goes only to 2 nd class would have no social distancing within each class ? They would not mix with other classes but stay in their class for all activities ? Our local school has a separate junior and senior side so in theory the junior side would be back in September as planned ?
Millem wrote: » Pods need to be 1m apart though? Depending on the size of the room they may not be all back together.
downthemiddle wrote: » I think you may have missed the point that the DES issued the guidelines recommending social distancing for children from 3rd class up. It has nothing to do with teachers or their unions.
richardw001 wrote: » I'm just a parent - but I saw a comment "it would look empty, because ASTI members would not be there under the current advice" - which I have to say made me a bit cross. My understanding is that most people - teachers and parents - are accepting of whatever the Government and Health authorities guidance is going to be. And I haven't heard anything like this from other unions over the last 3 months (nurses etc.) that would be under considerable more risk. And however bad the Department of Education is - look at the Department of Health ! If the majority of that union that do have a concern - could they not just wear full PPE like has been said ? or just go on the covid unemployment payment if they feel the heath authority advice isn't correct? Has there been a vote in that union above saying that they have the last say on whether the schools open ? Everyone is entitled to as safe a workplace as is possible - but I think the kind of statements (I would even say threats) that some unions are making really arent helpful.
Van.Bosch wrote: » Guards have to work without PPE and in close contact with each other and people. Why would teachers be different, they should be back in early August for catchup from last year to try and get the next year off to as best a start as possible. This isn’t an anti teacher rant - I’m sure lots of teachers would see the benefits of that for the kids. Teachers are been paid anyway.
Van.Bosch wrote: » Guards have to work without PPE and in close contact with each other and people. Why would teachers be different, they should be back in early August for catchup from last year to try and get the next year off to as best a start as possible. This isn’t an anti teacher rant - I’m sure lots of teachers would see the benefits of that for the kids. Teachers are being paid anyway.
khalessi wrote: » The reason you didnt hear anything about it from the Nurses Union, is because ppe and restrictions were already in place and were upgraded, without having to be persuaded. They spent millions shipping in PPE and setting up wards hiring hotels etc.
thomasdylan wrote: » This isn't true. It was only towards the end of April that nurses were allowed to wear masks when in contact with patients without Covid. Before that masks were only to be used in patients with COVID or suspected COVID.
khalessi wrote: » The PPE I am refering to is the usual masks gloves and aprons that we nurses used to wear dealing with MRSA patients. And it was beefed to the covid PPE which I was referring to. As a nurse when I was doing dressings etc I wore the standard ppe to prevent cross infection.