kub wrote: » Would a Kona be regarded as a family car ? It strikes me as something a Nun would drive around in, dare i say it but i would not like to be in one in a collision.
Sexual Chocolate wrote: » Any word on what could be replacing the i40s as I believe there no longer in production ?
CharlieCroker wrote: » Looks don't come into it. It could be a brick as long as it's up to the job. Too small and too slow to be a patrol car.
Silent Running wrote: » The 1.6 Kona is actually quite nippy. According to answers to my post about space for the kit it'll only need to accommodate someone's hat, half of a first aid kit and a half empty bag of donuts.
California Dreamer wrote: » I think there was something a few pages back about the new Peugeot 508? Either way another ball of sh1te car that looks good and shiny on a new plate.
carzony wrote: » I think they may just be a stop-gap until a larger purchase is made? similar to the avensis back in 2011.
POGAN wrote: » It’s extra purchase offered to the ags
kub wrote: » Were they a gift from Hyundai ?
bigdaddymac wrote: » so the kona is the new patrol car replacing the i30? The i40 is being replaced by tuscon?
Sgt. Bilko 09 wrote: » Tucson replacing i40, I don’t think they are phasing the i30s with konas, I stand to be corrected on that though
bigdaddymac wrote: » so the kona is the new patrol car replacing the i30? Yes The i40 is being replaced by tuscon?
California Dreamer wrote: » Do much of the CAB seizures end up in specialist units?
kub wrote: » Just wondering, would AGS have carried out much of suitability test on all of the different makes and models that they have / had on the fleet during the Covid shut down?
Tenderers must address each of the requirements mentioned in Section B of the award criteria and submit a detailed description of their proposed solutions including step-by-step details of the processes and procedures used, which demonstrates how the Goods/Service will be provided. A mere affirmative statement by the Tenderer that it can/will do so, or standard information leaflets or a reiteration of the Tender requirements is not sufficient in this regard.
Methodology for calculating score for cost: The lowest cost for each sub-criterion will receive the maximum score for that criterion. The costs submitted by other tenderers will receive a percentage score inversely proportional to the lowest price tender as follows: Score = (Lowest Cost Tender ÷ Cost of Tender being evaluated) x Maximum Score Available Example: Tender A (€30,000) has lowest whole life cost for a standard vehicle. It gets the maximum score of 400. ((30,000 ÷ 30,000) x 400) Tender B (€35,000) is marked: (30,000 ÷ 35,000) x 400 = 343 Tender C (€40,000) is marked: (30,000 ÷ 40,000) x 400 = 300 The tenderer with the highest combined score for all sub-criteria will be deemed to be the most economically advantageous for the cost part of the evaluation for each Lot.
For each separate lot the tender with the highest marks, calculated as above will be regarded as the lead tender. The vehicle concerned will then be the subject of Qualitative Testing by An Garda Síochána, as set out in Attachment 6, unless it has already been shown to meet Garda requirements under the Qualitative Testing criteria. If required, a Garda base vehicle as per the model tendered in any relevant Lot must be supplied for testing within 6 weeks of being requested. Failure to provide such a vehicle within this timeframe will result in your tender being eliminated at that point. The winning tender in each band shall be the lead tender which meets all requirements of the qualitative testing. If the vehicle is deemed suitable for operational requirements, it will be purchased and retained. If the vehicle fails to meet the requirements under any of the Qualitative Testing criteria, it shall be eliminated from the competition, and the tender with the next highest marks shall become the lead tender. If the vehicle is deemed unsuitable for operational requirements, it shall be returned to the supplier and decommissioned as a Garda vehicle at no cost to An Garda Síochána. A certificate of decommission shall be supplied to An Garda Síochána to this effect. All vehicles presented for testing will be put onto the Garda fleet and insurance will be covered by the State in respect of all claims for injury, loss or damage.
BaronVon wrote: » Edit: I only realised you were asking about the rental vehicles, but I had it typed up already Here is the current tender awards. I've also attached the vehicle evaluation form, which is used by garda driving instructors. That is one part of a weighted evaluation system, which is as follows:Quality of the Service Proposal (200 marks available)Whole-Life Cost (800 marks available)Qualitative Vehicle Testing Actually it appears there are no marks for the assessment of the vehicle, it's just a pass or fail, as to whether it meets the requirements.
California Dreamer wrote: » Saw a Kona in the flesh....Aw bless!!!
Sgt. Bilko 09 wrote: » Was in one today..... in a chase....hahaha a tree intervened and helped us, a one litre was actually pulling away from us