acequion wrote: » Thanks for replying Acosta. However I didn't mean being cancelled by any Govt action. What I would like to know is why there are some flight cancellations at the moment. Would it be because not enough seats are sold on that flight or passengers cancelling? Anyone?
atahuapla wrote: » You’ve obviously convinced yourself you’ll be fine and no risk to others so there isn’t much point talking to you. For others reading this - no matter how careful you think you’ll be at avoiding people when you’re abroad, you have zero control over it when you’re in a metal tube in the sky. 26 passengers tested positive after getting off a flight from DXB > HKG last Sat. Enjoy your Sangria.
stephenjmcd wrote: » Irish times headline quite misleading here "Ireland left out as EU opens borders to 15 states including Australia, Canada and Japan"https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/ireland-left-out-as-eu-opens-borders-to-15-states-including-australia-canada-and-japan-1.4292678?mode=amp&utm_source=upday&utm_medium=referral
wheresmybeaver wrote: » We're travelling to Mallorca on Friday for 9 days. Reasons we're going: - Flights were booked January and cannot be rescheduled without serious cost. Besides this we have literally no other options between now and Christmas to fly again due to annual leave, school etc. So we'd lose about €1000 if we don't fly Friday. - We're not staying in a hotel, we're visiting my wife's parents who live in the countryside. - We're travelling through Cork airport which has relatively lower human traffic at the moment and seems less risky. Palma Airport seems to have their act together too. - We won't be doing bars and restaurants over there as these seem to be hotspots for infection despite best efforts. - We plan to self quarantine for at least a week when we get back (ie kids won't be allowed out with the neighbour kids) and I'm able to work from home. Not so much because we think we're more likely to bring the virus back with us but because we don't want our neighbours to be worried. We're very conscious that we don't want to be selfish about this decision. I honestly don't see how this trip will be any more risky to us or anyone around us compared to travelling and living within Ireland. The inlaws are feeling very isolated over there and haven't seen any of their kids or grandkids since last summer; they would obviously be at lower risk if we didn't visit them at all but they don't want to cocoon for what could be years due to the virus. A few weeks ago as Ireland relaxed restrictions my own parents were reunited with their grandkids but my wife's parents haven't had that pleasure yet, and they're worried they might not see them at all this year. The virus is already in Ireland and will spread perfectly fine on its own now that people can travel across the country, and I can't imagine "staycationers" will spread the virus any less than the small numbers of people travelling within the EU. We all have to balance the risk of the virus against living our lives over the medium term. So that's why we're travelling.
NotMOL wrote: » It circumnavigate the globe because it was imported from regions with high number of cases and we didn't no how to contain the spread...there was literally no mask usage. But if an airport contains just nationalities from countries with low number of cases then how is the risk increased? The risk of course would be increased if Americans and Brazilians etc are going to be in the airports but right now they are not included on EU travel list.
acequion wrote: » I fully agree with everything you write but why do you feel the need to justify your decision so much, especially on an internet forum? Will all the youngsters congregating in gangs be justifying it. Like hell they will! Will all the house party goers who will drink a bit too much and forget to keep their distance and not touch? Like hell they will! What about those who travelled all throughout the pandemic. Same answer. What about the many who never really obeyed the restrictions? Same answer. And lest anyone think I'm judging them, I assure you I'm not.The point I'm making is that people will live their lives and there is many a person heading abroad right now who will be far more careful than the one on staycation. Or the one not on staycation just at home. But the latest in this whole sorry saga is to target and guilt trip people travelling!
wheresmybeaver wrote: » That's it exactly, there have been pitchforks out in the last few days for international travel and it has us in knots. I also made the mistake of reading the comments on a journal.ie article. I suppose I'm attempting to gauge the mood and justify the trip.
Dante7 wrote: » What NPHET are doing here is setting up the ordinary punter to be the fall guy and take the blame for their lack of foresight. International travel is opening up and there are no appropriate procedures in place to deal with it. Their only solution is to cry, "don't travel, stay at home". And when the inevitable cases do arrive, it won't be the families returning from Spain and Greece that bring the cases, it will be the arrivals from Brazil, South Asia, Middle East and Africa who are still only faced with the same wishy washy 14 day self isolation advisory as the family coming from safe zones. If they were serious about reducing the risk from travel they would implement a strict ban from areas that are currently badly hit. They can **** off if they think they are going to guilt trip me into not travelling due to their lack of planning.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » I will, my son will be in the middle, my girlfriend one side me the other. My Parents and brother have booked the seats in front of us. You know you can pay not to sit beside a stranger.
fisgon wrote: » By that logic, you should not travel on Dublin Bus, Irish Rail or any form of public transport. There is no difference between a flight from a low infected area and a trip from Galway to Dublin on Bus Eireann. It is exactly the same situation.
acequion wrote: » 100% agree. People need to recognise this guilt tripping for what it is.A cynical ploy by the likes of NPHET,
Boggles wrote: » Sorry, you think NPHET have hatched a cynical ploy to stop people going on holidays by guilt tripping them? That's fúcking next level tin foil.
atahuapla wrote: » Can you pay for Johnny coughsalot in the seat behind to sit somewhere else? Good luck to you mate, you have it all worked out. Not that I'd be going anywhere near a domestic bus or a train, it's not in any way comparable to getting into a cramped, poorly ventilated 737 out of a foreign country. You don't have to queue for security for a bus or train, you're also not checked into a tiny stairwell before you board and you have the option of opening a window in these two modes of transport. Anyway, this thread has turned into a place where people come to feel good about their decision to travel internationally again. As for me, as someone that boards about 80-100 flights every year for the past 13yrs, I'm happy to wait for a vaccination or at least for airline CEOs to take social distancing seriously.
ZX7R wrote: » Dr Margret Harris from the world health organization stated today on rtes drive time. She stated that the world health organization has not seen any transmission directly related to traveling on a plane adding the quality of air conditioning on planes to be of a very high standard. On reports from the who also states that airlines have decreased the duration time of the air to such an extente that with the other safety protocols in place that travelers will be in a very safe environment
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Pity that the virus travelled all over the world within weeks through International Travel, even though presumably the air filtering system was as good as it is now. Masks, it must be the newly introduced masks, that can be raised or lowered depending on your intake of food or beverages. LOL. Airline funds incoming to WHO.
Tenzor07 wrote: » never read such garbage...
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Pity that the virus travelled all over the world within weeks through International Travel, even though presumably the air filtering system was as good as it is now.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Thank you kindly. Must have hit a nerve
Strazdas wrote: » I think Dr. Holohan has totally dropped the ball here, glibly announcing that Irish people should not leave the country and should cancel any holidays already booked, without thinking through the massive implications of this for Irish tourism, aviation and assorted sectors of the economy, not to mention the ordinary consumer. He's speaking about this as if it is a minor sector of the economy such as nail varnishing or landscape gardening. It's no wonder his comments have caused total confusion in the travel and airline industry.
Strazdas wrote: » I think Dr. Holohan has totally dropped the ball here, glibly announcing that Irish people should not leave the country and should cancel any holidays already booked, without thinking through the massive implications of this for Irish tourism, aviation and assorted sectors of the economy, not to mention the ordinary consumer.He's speaking about this as if it is a minor sector of the economy such as nail varnishing or landscape gardening. It's no wonder his comments have caused total confusion in the travel and airline industry.