Acosta wrote: » It's a tricky one and people need to be very careful, but if everyone follows Dr. Tony's instructions there won't be much of an aviation industry left by the end of all this.
"“I genuinely don't think so...we take his advice very seriously.”
atahuapla wrote: » You’ve obviously convinced yourself you’ll be fine and no risk to others so there isn’t much point talking to you. For others reading this - no matter how careful you think you’ll be at avoiding people when you’re abroad, you have zero control over it when you’re in a metal tube in the sky. 26 passengers tested positive after getting off a flight from DXB > HKG last Sat. Enjoy your Sangria.
The_Brood wrote: » But Ireland is in the EU, so.....? Unless there has been an IREXIT unannounced I don't understand how Ireland is just doing its own thing.
scrips wrote: » So, we CAN travel (since flights are operating and other countries are accepting, even welcoming, us), we are ALLOWED to travel, but we SHOULDN'T travel (due to non-essential travel ban, insurance issues, guilt-tripping by the media, CMO advice). There is no end to the mixed messages that citizens are getting. Realistically the CMO is probably aiming for a good percentage of people to cancel their holiday plans in the hope that the lower numbers travelling will reduce the risk of a second wave, whatever that is.
tobefrank321 wrote: » I think people should voluntarily self quarantine for 2 weeks after returning from holidays, as best they can. Countries like Spain now have a low risk, but its the tourists from other countries you might meet there in pubs and the like where the problem is. As for much of an aviation industry, that's true, but if we have to shut down generally again, we won't have much of anything left. Something has to be sacrificed for the rest of the economy to survive.
scrips wrote: » So, we CAN travel (since flights are operating and other countries are accepting, even welcoming, us), we are ALLOWED to travel, but we SHOULDN'T travel (due to non-essential travel advisory, insurance issues, guilt-tripping by the media, CMO advice). There is no end to the mixed messages that citizens are getting. Realistically the CMO is probably aiming for a good percentage of people to cancel their holiday plans in the hope that the lower numbers travelling will reduce the risk of a second wave, whatever that is.
Deleted User wrote: » I've no issue with people going on holidays abroad. They just need to be conscious that international flight travel is high risk for spread of COVID-19. Hence why the two week quarantine is important. I had a 3 week trip booked to South American in September. I am writing this off as a loss. Unsure if insurance will cover the flights.
NotMOL wrote: » Do you have any sources which prove that international travel is high risk? If you go to another city with similar covid cases as your current city then how is the risk higher?
stephenjmcd wrote: » Basically cancel so people can get money back. What I have an issue with is this quote, still the comparisons with New Zealand which aren't comparable at all. "Public health expert Dr Gabriel Scally told the same programme he did not think airbridges were the solution and that there was in fact no real solution other than to “get rid of the virus in Ireland”. Ireland should follow the example of countries like New Zealand and introduce strict quarantine measures for people arriving into the country. There were enough hotels near the airports to do this, he said."https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/call-for-government-to-cancel-flights-follows-holohan-s-foreign-travel-comments-1.4292494?mode=amp
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I think the issue is not travelling as such, but the mingling at close quarters amongst many different nationalities in crowded spaces like airports, apron tranfer buses, queuing to get on board, and on the plane itself, in all directions/connections. The virus did circumnavigate the globe within a few weeks due to international travel, so it is reasonable to assume it could do so again.
faceman wrote: » If the Irish government cancels flights from Ireland, people will just fly from Belfast. This carries an increased risk of importing the virus in an uncontrolled manner, as there will be no record for them travelling and no requirement to quarantine coming back. Contact tracing will be impeded until its too late. The government was asked to force airlines to refund passengers a few months ago. Instead they backed an EU bill allowing airlines not to have to refund and be able to offer vouchers instead.
the.red.baron wrote: » some pain in the hoop though and belfast hardly has the capacity that dublin does and it would put many many people off sure they could always walk there
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Going 10 August, Portugal for 2 weeks. Looking forward to the Sun, everyone wearing a mask because it's mandotary, beaches set out for social distancing unlike Ireland, all restaurants and bars and shops fully compiling with social distancing unlike Tesco and Penneys here which is like a cattle mart once u get in. No groups teens everywhere on buses, parks etc like Ireland Íl take my chances in such a dangerous place
atahuapla wrote: » Nobody cares about you and your chances. People care that you bring it back and infect them which you have no control over when you're sitting in the middle seat of a full Ryanair Boeing 737.
acequion wrote: » I'm booked to fly to Spain on 10th July. Talk of flight cancellations making me nervous. How likely is that to happen? For those of us very far down the country Belfast is no good.
Acosta wrote: » Almost no chance of it being cancelled. Let's not forget, the government wouldn't even step into stop flights coming into Dublin from Bergamo, which was the epicentre of the virus in Europe, even after we went into lockdown.
faceman wrote: » Here here! How was your experience navigating Dublin airport? Much in terms of delays from the extra measures? How was arrival in Madrid! Easy to navigate the airport and extra steps on arrival? (Trying to anticipate what I’ll face with my own journey)
wheresmybeaver wrote: » We're travelling to Mallorca on Friday for 9 days. Reasons we're going: - Flights were booked January and cannot be rescheduled without serious cost. Besides this we have literally no other options between now and Christmas to fly again due to annual leave, school etc. So we'd lose about €1000 if we don't fly Friday. - We're not staying in a hotel, we're visiting my wife's parents who live in the countryside. - We're travelling through Cork airport which has relatively lower human traffic at the moment and seems less risky. Palma Airport seems to have their act together too. - We won't be doing bars and restaurants over there as these seem to be hotspots for infection despite best efforts. - We plan to self quarantine for at least a week when we get back (ie kids won't be allowed out with the neighbour kids) and I'm able to work from home. Not so much because we think we're more likely to bring the virus back with us but because we don't want our neighbours to be worried. We're very conscious that we don't want to be selfish about this decision. I honestly don't see how this trip will be any more risky to us or anyone around us compared to travelling and living within Ireland. The inlaws are feeling very isolated over there and haven't seen any of their kids or grandkids since last summer; they would obviously be at lower risk if we didn't visit them at all but they don't want to cocoon for what could be years due to the virus. A few weeks ago as Ireland relaxed restrictions my own parents were reunited with their grandkids but my wife's parents haven't had that pleasure yet, and they're worried they might not see them at all this year. The virus is already in Ireland and will spread perfectly fine on its own now that people can travel across the country, and I can't imagine "staycationers" will spread the virus any less than the small numbers of people travelling within the EU. We all have to balance the risk of the virus against living our lives over the medium term. So that's why we're travelling.