bettyoleary wrote: » Let me tell you now. This virus is uknown. Yes, mostly old people die with it, but young people spread it. Babies and young children have got it and died. We know in the UK but who knows in South America. So dont be so selfish bcos you want your kids to go back to school In my opinion kids are best educated . at home. They have less distractions , so can concentrate more. They are less likely to join in herd mentality and stab each other. They are less likely to be bullied
khalessi wrote: » Betty half the time you quote yourselg. Dont call me selfish. HOw dare you! Read my posts all of them before you do that. You will see that my 3 nieces got it along with their parents and one of those kids is high risk due to having 3/4 of one llung,so bugger off. And to add I also have CF in my family so masks wearing is important for us. Half the time here no one knows what you are on about because you seem to be having conversations with yourself, constantly quoting yourself, use the edit button instead if you want to add something.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » I'd imagine a class full of 30 kids who might not even be able to tie their own laces might have trouble with them. They are not very comfortable to wear so a young child would be pulling at their mask all day and that defeats the purpose. Secondary age kids should be able to manage just fine, I think the HSE has rightly set the age at 13 years old. Practically though they would need to be changed at least once during the school day. Masks would need to be taken off for food/drinks etc not to mention the huge increase in waste for schools to dispose of several hundred face masks every day (unless kids are made to bring them home with them).
Sammy2012 wrote: » The guidelines for social distancing in relation to the July provision are out. 2m outside the classroom for adults and 1m where possible inside the classroom. Does this pave the way for a full return to school in Sept?
Dublingirl80 wrote: » I havent seen this but if the same applies for September then 1m which is probably the best compromise would mean some classes would be half a week. I don't know if class size would determine this or room size. Some would be small enough classes in big rooms and it would be full time. Some would be impossible. It's a pity they coudlnt also make more use of outdoor space for some months and maybe cover over the areas with shelter. There is almost 20 times less risk outdoors which is a huge difference. Awnings and half out half in style rooms could be constructed and would actually be useful anywya for yard times when rain happens etc. Someone with access to funds and innovative ideas needs to be put in charge of these issues. I dont feel its always a funding issue but an issue with where the funding actually is going.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » The 1m 'where possible' would be workable to some extent for July provision because it involves fewer children than a normal school day, albeit some will have more complex needs. They've already said they want kids back fully by end of August so social distancing is simply a non runner. Masks on public transport now mandatory too so social distancing about to be eliminated there as well to allow more capacity.
bettyoleary wrote: » That is not true at all. There are children that have died with Covid, developed horrible symptoms and even babies. Why are you saying that? Its extremely dangerous, Whats your agenda?
pwurple wrote: » Do you work for The Sun? That is complete hysterics. What I said was absolutely true. Of the billions of people in the world the risk is absolutely tiny. There is higher risk of your child being killed in a football training session than of Covid.
Dublingirl80 wrote: » Well you seem determined anyway. Best to just wait and see. No masks, no distancing, wouldn't say this all will have a good impact on the teacher shortage issues. As for sick leave for any cough or fever until covid tests are done. You seem to think saying things like social distancing is non runner solves the problem. Masks on buses is to solve the distancing issue . So which will it be, masks/visors or distancing?
deiseindublin wrote: » I looked and they're not on DES website. Could you link to them please.
Treppen wrote: » But the thing is you don't pass on "being killed in a football training session" to another person.
pwurple wrote: » Sligo hasn't had a case in weeks, same for Kerry.
Acorn nursery at Westcroft has had 20 staff, children and family members test positive for Covid-19 over the past week and a half..."We’ve seen an outbreak in Milton Keynes in a setting where all sensible precautions were being followed."
The bubbles exposed to the confirmed cases are self-isolating... "The nursery remains open to bubbles not exposed to confirmed cases." Dr Victor Aiyedun, Consultant in Communicable Disease Control at PHE, said cases in the school setting could help scientists better understand the transmission of the disease."It will also provide insight into how the virus spreads in nursery settings as they prepare to welcome more children over the coming weeks,"he said.
pwurple wrote: » And you've unilaterally determined that's the case is it? Mixed studies there to be fair. Here's a case study of a 9 year old who attended 3 schools with Covid, while showing symptoms of the virus, and passed it on to exactly 0 people.https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa424/5819060 There's also an argument to be had for not having a blanket approach where everything is based on Dublin's infection rate. Sligo hasn't had a case in weeks, same for Kerry. Why subject their schools to some draconian measures when there isn't a single case within 100 miles of them, just because the durty dubs are spreading it around? :pac:
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » So guideline of 1 metre social distancing for schools (from 3rd class upwards). Masks not mandatory. Looks good on paper but practically speaking, it is difficult to implement in any meaningful way. Are teachers going to have to enforce this? How will they do that? This will be the only place where kids will be socially distancing let's be honest.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » So HSE have published a hefty COVID-19 Interim recommendations for the reopening of schools and educational facilities document. Guideline of at least 1 metre social distancing for schools (from 3rd class upwards). Masks not mandatory. Looks good on paper but practically speaking, it is difficult to implement in any meaningful way. Are teachers going to have to enforce this? How will they do that? This will be the only place where kids will be socially distancing let's be honest. Lots of detail in the document, it covers a lot.
Van.Bosch wrote: » My read of that is up to and including second class there is no restrictions and all students can go back full time from September. Am I reading it right?
boggerman1 wrote: » More nonsense or is it box ticking for the schools to reopen in September.the school’s should be reopening as normal in august but my guess is that the teacher unions will sabre rattle and the whole thing will be solved by money being threw at them.
Strath2020 wrote: » There is no social distancing going on locally here with teens so September in schools will be no different. The beaches and parks are packed. I think teachers are getting a hard time. They deserve to be provided with facial shields if they want them (at the very minimum) as they will be at risk. I can’t see students all wearing masks either unless they are compulsory. If a teacher or student gets sick with symptoms will the whole class or school have to isolate? I’d we do get a second wave what happens to the kids that can’t access WiFi where broadband is bad or they don’t have computers? What about boarding schools or day schools with boarders? Kids coming from different counties and countries? Assuming the overseas students will have to quarantine before the other students arrive. I don’t think there are any easy answers to any of the questions. One thing I do know having homeschooled my teens since March is that it is a really really tough job.
brookers wrote: » can we just assume the children wont get school for the whole week but perhaps a couple of days and just hope things improve. Im already of that mind and ready for another term of home schooling a couple of mornings. If i feel the situation is not safe and things are looking a bit hairy with the virus I will take them out.