Alf Veedersane wrote: » You're likely to be doing those stupid home virtual workouts or nothing in that case.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » If you live close to your gym, especially if it’s walking distance, then the not being able to shower there wouldn’t be a big deal. But for many they use the gym in morning on way to work, so just won’t be feasible to not be able to shower there after if no shower facilities in work. I drive about 15km to my gym so if I’m only allowed a 1hr slot not sure if I would bother. And if I’m paying full price for the gym I’m going there to do all my workouts, not to lift few weights and running there and back for my cardio. And I’m not partaking in these stupid home virtual workouts.
micar wrote: » "I am the customer".....ffs.....don't be coming out that nonsense......the customer is always right and I'll do what I want .....blah blah blah... What's the problem in doing this? If gyms can only have a fraction of people working out at the same time, then people need to use their time wisely and not faff around. Get in, do your work out and get out. I've no problem being kitted out and leave as soon as I'm finished. I can stretch, shower and relax at home.
Balmed Out wrote: » With air movement increasing any spread I'd wonder will ac systems be turned off or down low, would mean outdoorsfor wherever can making even more sense.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » That’s true but I am the customer. I won’t pay for a gym that tells me I have to arrive fully kitted out, then spend 1hr or less (to factor in the slot switch) and then leave without being able to shower and relax. Even if it’s only for 3-6 months I probably still won’t pay for this.
Flickerfusion wrote: » I wonder could gyms create outdoor space for machines? Like if you took your carpark or a tennis court or something and put up a temporary roof and put all the machines outside. Other options might be removing / replacing walls with sliding windows or or installing very large fans to remove and replace air. I don't think anyone would object to gyms being outdoor freshly cool. If anything it would make working out less unpleasant.
Humour Me wrote: » The problem with this calculation is that the 50 people includes any gym staff and cleaners who are also onsite. So you are probably looking at 40-45 max at any time. They are also expected to maintain a level of social distancing, so depending on the size of the gym, the number allowed in the space could be further reduced. For some gyms it may not make financial sense to open before the limit is increased to 100 in July.
Alf Veedersane wrote: » If they limit to 1-hour slots across the 18-hour days that are in place in most FF gyms, that's a max of 900 members they can accommodate per day. They have ~ 40k members across 16 gyms.
Alf Veedersane wrote: » It's likely that from July 20th they can increase capacity to 100 at any one time which will help a lot. But the reality is that use of the gym won't be normal from the end of the month insofar as the limitations will likely mean you won't be able to train when you want and for as long as you want for a while.
Alf Veedersane wrote: » To be fair to you is what you mean. It's not especially fair to the members that lose out because there are fewer slots with 90/120 min.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » But to be fair if there is a time limit it should be 2hrs or minimum 90mins. And would need some kind of booking system. And people will just cancel membership if situation cannot work with them and there doesn’t seem to be any end to it.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » Even for non 24hr gym so let’s say they are open 6am to 10pm, how can they impose as little as a 1hr limit?? Even if limit is 50 customers at any 1 time, at gym membership fees and if they are limiting to 1hr based on their member numbers, that would be an obscene number of members and therefore turnover. In fairness to these gyms they have not actually said there is a 1hr limit, and I understand they have high fees. On flip side they are making big profits and gyms are increasing in popularity in this modern me me me world. But to be fair if there is a time limit it should be 2hrs or minimum 90mins. And would need some kind of booking system. And people will just cancel membership if situation cannot work with them and there doesn’t seem to be any end to it.
caviardreams wrote: » Agree - half a loaf is better than no bread and it's about making compromises to make it workable. I think your idea of a "no show" charge e.g. you are charged a day pass rate of €10 if you don't show up is a great idea too, as it will stop people booking lots of slots and no showing up if the weather is bad or they are tired or just don't care. An hour isn't ideal but I guess you try and go there warmed up and cut rest times or sets where you have to and work around it
Alf Veedersane wrote: » One hour isn't enough for me to do a full session either but a two-hour slot as standard has a big knock on impact on the number of members that miss out. Better to try and accommodate as many members as possible within reason than accommodate those who need more than one hour.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » A 1hr slot is not enough, if they are gonna impose a time restriction it will have to be 2hrs. Let’s just say average gym goer wants to do treadmill, bike and weights. I need more than 1hr to fit that in, especially if thee is 10mins less to handle each stop/start of each slot.