Seanergy wrote: » And they are not photographed beside buses for no reason
Arrival wrote: » It's clear from social media that they're simply not conveying the purpose of mass mask wearing well enough, still lots of idiots going mad saying they don't protect you from the virus. Could they not clear all of this up at least, get the point about asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic spreading through the heads of this thick nation
GT89 wrote: » If masks are so effective in stopping the spread of Chinese virus and they all wear masks in China then how come the virus got out of China?
alentejo wrote: » I have a question about masks. They (HSE / Gov) say that you should use them indoors (eg retail)and when you cant social distance less than 2 meters. When I am in a supermarket, I am 99% of the time greater than 2 meters from anyone? Typically the odd time, I might briefly pass someone less than 2 meters distance or at the checkout, however a perspex screen is in place. In this instance should I wear a mask?
is_that_so wrote: » The message is you should wear them where you can't distance, for example, public transport, not everywhere.
ednwireland wrote: » totally agree with this i normally try to go shopping at quiet times so being socially distant isnt difficult
Arrival wrote: » When someone with the virus breathes, talks, coughs and sneezes the aerosols and droplets they emit can stay airborne for some time after they've left the area, so yes everyone should be wearing masks indoors as air isn't circulating well enough for this to not be an issue. You are not wearing a mask for protecting yourself but instead on the off chance you could have the virus and do not know you have it or have very mild symptoms, wearing a mask helps reduce the likelihood of you passing it on further. The more people taking this approach, the less the virus spreads: the same aim we had with the lockdown and why we all respected it "My mask protects you, your mask protects me" - this only works successfully if we have a high % of people actually playing their part and respecting this guideline, same as has been done in so many other countries already
Arrival wrote: » What relevance does that have to the context of my post
is_that_so wrote: » You claimed people are being thick. They are not, just making a judgement call on the advice.
ax530 wrote: » good question I have been thinking the same.
Boggles wrote: » Get a measuring tape, measure out 2 meters. It's a lot bigger than everyone thinks.
ShineOn7 wrote: » Anyone using a UV light sanitiser to clean theirs instead of washing them? If so, please link to the one you bought. Thanks
granturismo wrote: » alternative to 60deg C and soap.
ShineOn7 wrote: » Well there is the opinion out there too that constantly doing the above to masks renders them useless
Jim_Hodge wrote: » I hate to say this but. :....... . Link? .
Re: mask sanitation... I’d recommend a UV light sanitiser. Heat could break down the plastic microfibres which create the protection/filtration in a mask and I don’t know how Milton could react with masks but figure it could damage them too. This is one of the reasons I bought a UV light steriliser back when I saw this coming.
ShineOn7 wrote: » The HSE worker on here who's doing the AMA https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=113742106&postcount=51