[Deleted User] wrote: » Do you have any sad or funny friendship stories you'd like to share?
Deleted User wrote: » For me what makes a friend is a person who is loyal, who is kind, has a sense of humour and can have a laugh, who will listen and is reliable. That's what I offer so I expect the same back.
spoonerhead wrote: » Ive got a wide group of friends, it has its benefits. I lost contact with the last ‘Best friend’ when I was a teenager. I completely agree with you about what makes friendship work, except maybe loyalty and reliability. Reason being it’s great to be loyal but friendship isn’t a relationship, you’ll befriend others over time and see less of your normal group. So don’t be too focused on loyalty or you might start seeing bad in situations which aren’t meant to be taken that way. Also I’m extremely reliable, would say that’s a great thing for having more acquaintance. But most take advantage of you then.
Wibbs wrote: » I've a few close mates I've known since childhood, so a loooong time. Loyalty would be a major part of it. Reliability another. Sense of humour and similar and complimentary intelligence too. I've never really lost friends as such, though I have found women to be long term unreliable in that capacity. Oft great friends, but far more likely to drift. Also generally more likely to stew over any slight imagined or not, more than men anyway.
Deleted User wrote: » My Male friends are so much "easier" than my female ones. They are just there. They don't drift. If they have an issue they say it and that's the end of it. They communicate in a more transparent way.
Trigger Happy wrote: » My closest friends are the ones I made in school. I tend not to lose touch with close friends but it has happened sometimes. A lot more turnover with less close friends. What messes with my head is getting friendly with someone who then drops you like a hot potato for little logical reason.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » I don't over analyze friendship.
Deleted User wrote: » Are your friends important to you? How do you view them in your life?
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » I don't ask those questions.
Deleted User wrote: » You don't ask yourself if you do? Could you live a life without friendship? I'm just being curious is all. Ah you expanded your post so discount the above
[Deleted User] wrote: » I've been having a think about the people in my life and what constitutes a friend. I am in the camp of quality over quantity and prefer a few close friends to a large group of acquaintances. A lot have gone from my life down through the years and I wonder about that. I don't just mean growing apart but actual stuff happening and one or both of us realising that this isn't a friendship we want. Someone close to me recently made the good point that not everyone wants or is able for long term attachment. I think I have definitely experienced this dynamic. For me what makes a friend is a person who is loyal, who is kind, has a sense of humour and can have a laugh, who will listen and is reliable. That's what I offer so I expect the same back. Tell me great contributors of AH what do you look for in a friendship? Are you content with a fellow shooter of the breeze or do you want your intellect challenged? A yes man/woman or an honest view? Do you have any sad or funny friendship stories you'd like to share?
Deleted User wrote: » I could go weeks/months without talking to my closest friends,would never ring them,but if met them in the village/called to visit em,could easily pass 2-3 hours catching up,dont really get anything from phonecalls/msging people
riffmongous wrote: » Not the same but your post reminded me of something similar that used to drive me mad with some friends in university years ago, I didn't get how they could be so friendly when you'd meet them but they'd make no more than the minimum of effort to actually be friends, the kind who'd never contact you unsolicited.. I still don't get it but I at least recognise it now and don't put any effort into those people from the beginning now, the thing is of course that it's grand when you live nearby and bump into each other every now and again but once you move away or live in a big city or whatever it doesn't work anymore and you lose touch with them very quickly once you get sick of being the one to always have to text first
Wibbs wrote: » Actually thinking more on that: I'm an only child so in many ways I got to choose my brothers and sisters(with a smattering of cousins ). I just happen to call them friends. The saying "blood is thicker than water" today means familial bonds will always be the strongest, but another older interpretation is that the blood of "battle" shared is stronger than the bonds(water) of the womb. I'd go along with that. Certainly among most of my friends we'd be closer than their respective siblings.
gifted wrote: » I had two very close friends in secondary school....we were always together....left school but still remained close...out every weekend and the like.....then they met a couple of women and suddenly they started going out as two couples and I was pushed out....that affected me very badly . ..to go from very close friends to nothing after a lot of years......to the extent that I don't get close to anyone ....48 years of age and my best friend is probably herself and my friend that I know the longest lives in the arsehole of kerry.....I can count on him and vice versa......so that's it 2 people. Sad really.